Cited by 7Physical Activity and HealthEating Disorders and BehaviorsObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Self-Reported Low Vitality, Poor Mental Health, and Low Dietary Restraint Are Associated with Overperception of Physical Exertion

Open access
Chandler-Laney, Paula C., Brock, David W., Gower, Barbara A., Alvarez, Jessica A., Bush, Nikki C., Hunter, Gary R.·2010·Journal of Obesity

Abstract

Objective. We investigated whether perceived exertion, in comparison to the physiological response to exercise, was associated with self-reported vitality, mental health, and physical function during daily activities, or weight control behaviors.Design. Weight-reduced, formerly overweight women (n=126, aged 22–46 years), completed health and dietary control questionnaires, and underwent a treadmill-walking task while heart rate, ventilation, respiratory exchange ratio, and ratings of perceived exertion were recorded.Results. Overperception of exertion (perceived exertion physiological exertion) was inversely associated with vitality (r=−0.190,P<.05), mental health (r=−0.188,P<.05), and dietary control (rvalues range−0.231to−0.317,P<.05). In linear regression modeling, vitality or mental health, and cognitive dietary restraint were independently associated with accuracy of perceived exertion, independent of age, ethnicity, and engagement in exercise during weight loss. Each model explained 7%-8% of the variance in accuracy of perceived exertion.Conclusion. Women with low vitality or poor mental health, and poor dietary control may overperceive exertion. Such overperception may be a barrier to engage in physical activity and thus increase susceptibility to weight gain.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2010/207451

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chandler-Laney, P. C., Brock, D. W., Gower, B. A., Alvarez, J. A., Bush, N. C., & Hunter, G. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
  • University of Vermont (US)
  • University of Alabama (US)
Corresponding author
Chandler-Laney, Paula C.
Venue
Journal of Obesity
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010
Volume
2010
Pages
1-7
ISSN
  • 2090-0708 (ISSN-L)
  • 2090-0716
OpenAlex
W2130003400
Cited by
7
References
26
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Obesity (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (RO1 DK 51684-10, M01 RR-00032)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
perceived exertion, rating of perceived exertion, vitality, mental health, dietary restraint, weight control behaviors, overweight women, physical activity participation, exercise adherence, weight regain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review