Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 12Workplace Violence and BullyingEmergency and Acute Care StudiesPatient-Provider Communication in Healthcare

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Encountering Anger in the Emergency Department: Identification, Evaluations and Responses of Staff Members to Anger Displays

Open access
Arik, Cheshin, Anat, Rafaeli, Arie, Eisenman·2012·Emergency Medicine International

Abstract

Background. Anger manifestations in emergency departments (EDs) occur daily, interrupting workflow and exposing staff to risk.Objectives. How staff assess and recognize patients’ angry outbursts in EDs and elucidate responses to anger expressions, while considering effects of institution guidelines.Methods. Observations of staff patient interaction in EDs and personal interviews of staff (n=38) were conducted. Two questionnaires were administered (n=80&n=144). Assessment was based mainly on regression statistic tests.Results. Staff recognizes two types of anger displays. Magnitude of anger expressions were correlated with staff’s fear level. Staff’s responses ranged from ignoring incidents, giving in to patients’ requests or immediately calling security. When staff felt fear and became angry they tended to call security. Staff was more likely to ignore anger when incident responsibility was assigned to patients.Discussion. Anger encounters are differentiated according to intensity level, which influences interpretations and response. Organizational policy has an effect on staff’s response.Conclusions. Staff recognizes anger at varying levels and responds accordingly. The level of danger staff feels is a catalyst in giving in or calling security. Call security is influenced by fear, and anger. Permanent guidelines can help staff in responding to anger encounters.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2012/603215

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Response to anger encounter. The participants indicated on a 1–7 point scale the likelihood they would respond in one of the three ways (1) giving in to anger, (2) ignore the anger, (3) call security. Calling security is the only significant difference between the high and low anger (F(1, 141) = 6.91, P < 0.05).
Figure 1 Response to anger encounter. The participants indicated on a 1–7 point scale the likelihood they would respond in one of the three ways (1) giving in to anger, (2) ignore the anger, (3) call security. Calling security is the only significant difference between the high and low anger (F(1, 141) = 6.91, P < 0.05).CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. 1981, Nursing Outlook, 29, 640
  2. 2010, Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research, 15, 337

Cited by

See all 12

Metadata

Authors
Arik, C., Anat, R., & Arie, E.
Affiliations
  • Department of Social Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Weesperplein 4, 1018 XA Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • William Davidson Faculty of Industrial Engineering and Management at Technion City, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel
  • Department of Emergency Medicine, The Western Galilee Hospital, P.O. Box 21, Naharia 22100, Israel
Venue
Emergency Medicine International
Published
2012
Volume
2012
Pages
1-5
ISSN
  • 2090-2840 (ISSN-L)
  • 2090-2859
OpenAlex
W2142937610
Cited by
12
References
12
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Emergency Medicine International (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Israeli National Institute (2014746)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Workplace Violence and Bullying
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Keywords
staff-patient interaction, organizational policy, anger assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.