The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Robust Vessel Segmentation in Fundus Images
Open accessAbstract
One of the most common modalities to examine the human eye is the eye-fundus photograph. The evaluation of fundus photographs is carried out by medical experts during time-consuming visual inspection. Our aim is to accelerate this process using computer aided diagnosis. As a first step, it is necessary to segment structures in the images for tissue differentiation. As the eye is the only organ, where the vasculature can be imaged in an in vivo and noninterventional way without using expensive scanners, the vessel tree is one of the most interesting and important structures to analyze. The quality and resolution of fundus images are rapidly increasing. Thus, segmentation methods need to be adapted to the new challenges of high resolutions. In this paper, we present a method to reduce calculation time, achieve high accuracy, and increase sensitivity compared to the original Frangi method. This method contains approaches to avoid potential problems like specular reflexes of thick vessels. The proposed method is evaluated using the STARE and DRIVE databases and we propose a new high resolution fundus database to compare it to the state-of-the-art algorithms. The results show an average accuracy above 94% and low computational needs. This outperforms state-of-the-art methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Computational Approach to Edge Detection
Canny, J. (1986) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.1986.4767851 · Cited by 30,004
Bilateral Filtering for Gray and Color Images
Tomasi, C., & Manduchi, R. (2002) · Sixth International Conference on Computer Vision (IEEE Cat. No.98CH36271) · doi:10.1109/iccv.1998.710815 · Cited by 8,177 · cited 1×
“Histogram stretching [28] and bilateral filtering [29] are applied to the green channel.”
MethodRidge-based vessel segmentation in color images of the retina
Staal, J., Abramoff, M. D., Niemeijer, M., Viergever, M. A., & van Ginneken, B. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2004.825627 · Cited by 4,202
Cited by
Generative adversarial network in medical imaging: A review
Yi, X., Walia, E., & Babyn, P. (2019) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2019.101552 · Cited by 1,863
DUNet: A deformable network for retinal vessel segmentation
Jin, Q., Meng, Z., Pham, T. D., Chen, Q., Wei, L., & Su, R. (2019) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2019.04.025 · Cited by 867
Diabetic retinopathy detection through deep learning techniques: A review
Alyoubi, W. L., Shalash, W. M., & Abulkhair, M. F. (2020) · Informatics in Medicine Unlocked · doi:10.1016/j.imu.2020.100377 · Cited by 527
Orlando, J. I., Prokofyeva, E., & Blaschko, M. B. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2016.2535311 · Cited by 503
CNNs for automatic glaucoma assessment using fundus images: an extensive validation
Diaz-Pinto, A., Morales, S., Naranjo, V., Köhler, T., Mossi, J. M., & Navea, A. (2019) · BioMedical Engineering OnLine · doi:10.1186/s12938-019-0649-y · Cited by 435
Metadata
- Authors
- Budai, A., Bock, R., Maier, A., Hornegger, J., & Michelson, G.
- Venue
- International Journal of Biomedical Imaging
- Publisher
- Hindawi Limited
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 2013
- Pages
- 1-11
- ISSN
- 1687-4188 (ISSN-L)
- 1687-4196
- OpenAlex
- W2129098176
- Cited by
- 642
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Robust Vessel Segmentation in Fundus Images. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1155/2013/154860
- The paper
- Budai, A., Bock, R., Maier, A., Hornegger, J., & Michelson, G. (2013). Robust Vessel Segmentation in Fundus Images. International Journal of Biomedical Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/154860
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.