Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 225

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Current Direct Neutrino Mass Experiments

Open access
Drexlin, G., Hannen, V., Mertens, S., Weinheimer, C.·2013·Advances in High Energy Physics

Abstract

In this contribution, we review the status and perspectives of direct neutrino mass experiments, which investigate the kinematics ofβ-decays of specific isotopes (3 H,187 Re,163 Ho) to derive model-independent information on the averaged electron (anti)neutrino mass. After discussing the kinematics ofβ-decay and the determination of the neutrino mass, we give a brief overview of past neutrino mass measurements (SN1987a-ToF studies, Mainz and Troitsk experiments for 3 H, cryobolometers for 187 Re). We then describe the Karlsruhe Tritium Neutrino (KATRIN) experiment currently under construction at Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, which will use the MAC-E-Filter principle to push the sensitivity down to a value of 200 meV (90% C.L.). To do so, many technological challenges have to be solved related to source intensity and stability, as well as precision energy analysis and low background rate close to the kinematic endpoint of tritiumβ-decay at 18.6 keV. We then review new approaches such as the MARE, ECHO, and Project8 experiments, which offer the promise to perform an independent measurement of the neutrino mass in the sub-eV region. Altogether, the novel methods developed in direct neutrino mass experiments will provide vital information on the absolute mass scale of neutrinos.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2013/293986

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

  • New model for electron-impact ionization cross sections of molecules

    Hwang, W., Kim, Y.-K., & Rudd, M. E. (1996) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.471116 · Cited by 586 · cited 1×

    “-Kutta methods described in [101, 102, 103] and include physical processes like synchrotron radiation and elastic, electronic excitation and ionization collisions of electrons with molecular hydrogen [104, 105, 106]. The detailed tritium source model allows to simulate the actual neutrino mass measurement with high pr…”
    Method

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 225

Metadata

Authors
Drexlin, G., Hannen, V., Mertens, S., & Weinheimer, C.
Venue
Advances in High Energy Physics
Published
2013
Volume
2013
Pages
1-39
ISSN
  • 1687-7357 (ISSN-L)
  • 1687-7365
OpenAlex
W2034417446
Cited by
225
References
1
FWCI
13.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Current Direct Neutrino Mass Experiments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1155/2013/293986
The paper
Drexlin, G., Hannen, V., Mertens, S., & Weinheimer, C. (2013). Current Direct Neutrino Mass Experiments. Advances in High Energy Physics. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/293986

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.