The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Trends in Computer-Aided Manufacturing in Prosthodontics: A Review of the Available Streams
Open accessAbstract
In prosthodontics, conventional methods of fabrication of oral and facial prostheses have been considered the gold standard for many years. The development of computer-aided manufacturing and the medical application of this industrial technology have provided an alternative way of fabricating oral and facial prostheses. This narrative review aims to evaluate the different streams of computer-aided manufacturing in prosthodontics. To date, there are two streams: the subtractive and the additive approaches. The differences reside in the processing protocols, materials used, and their respective accuracy. In general, there is a tendency for the subtractive method to provide more homogeneous objects with acceptable accuracy that may be more suitable for the production of intraoral prostheses where high occlusal forces are anticipated. Additive manufacturing methods have the ability to produce large workpieces with significant surface variation and competitive accuracy. Such advantages make them ideal for the fabrication of facial prostheses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
State of the art of zirconia for dental applications
Denry, I., & Kelly, J. R. (2008) · Dental Materials · doi:10.1016/j.dental.2007.05.007 · Cited by 2,133
The future of dental devices is digital
van Noort, R. (2012) · Dental Materials · doi:10.1016/j.dental.2011.10.014 · Cited by 1,408
The Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms
(2005) · The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry · doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.03.013 · Cited by 1,323
Stabilized zirconia as a structural ceramic: An overview
Kelly, J. R., & Denry, I. (2008) · Dental Materials · doi:10.1016/j.dental.2007.05.005 · Cited by 1,172
An overview of the machinability of aeroengine alloys
Ezugwu, E. O., Bonney, J., & Yamane, Y. (2003) · Journal of Materials Processing Technology · doi:10.1016/s0924-0136(02)01042-7 · Cited by 1,116
A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience
MIYAZAKI, T., HOTTA, Y., KUNII, J., KURIYAMA, S., & TAMAKI, Y. (2009) · Dental Materials Journal · doi:10.4012/dmj.28.44 · Cited by 1,070
Selective laser melting of biocompatible metals for rapid manufacturing of medical parts
Vandenbroucke, B., & Kruth, J. (2007) · Rapid Prototyping Journal · doi:10.1108/13552540710776142 · Cited by 981
Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations
Beuer, F., Schweiger, J., & Edelhoff, D. (2008) · British Dental Journal · doi:10.1038/sj.bdj.2008.350 · Cited by 943
Five-year clinical results of zirconia frameworks for posterior fixed partial dentures.
Sailer, I., Fehér, A., Filser, F., Gauckler, L. J., Lüthy, H., & Hämmerle, C. H. F. (2007) · PubMed · Cited by 807
Sailer, I., Pjetursson, B. E., Zwahlen, M., & Hämmerle, C. H. F. (2007) · Clinical Oral Implants Research · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01468.x · Cited by 724
Cited by
Additive manufacturing of ceramics for dental applications: A review
Galante, R., Figueiredo-Pina, C. G., & Serro, A. P. (2019) · Dental Materials · doi:10.1016/j.dental.2019.02.026 · Cited by 441
3D printing restorative materials using a stereolithographic technique: a systematic review
Della Bona, A., Cantelli, V., Britto, V. T., Collares, K. F., & Stansbury, J. W. (2021) · Dental Materials · doi:10.1016/j.dental.2020.11.030 · Cited by 334
Yeslam, H. E., Freifrau von Maltzahn, N., & Nassar, H. M. (2024) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.17793 · Cited by 55
Marginal and internal fit of fixed prosthodontic constructions: a literature review
Heboyan, A. G. (2019) · International Journal of Dental Research and Reviews · doi:10.28933/ijdrr-2019-06-1105 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Abduo, J., Lyons, K., & Bennamoun, M.
- Venue
- International Journal of Dentistry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014
- Volume
- 2014
- Pages
- 1-15
- ISSN
- 1687-8728 (ISSN-L)
- 1687-8736
- OpenAlex
- W1982517518
- Cited by
- 424
- References
- 44
- FWCI
- 19.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Trends in Computer-Aided Manufacturing in Prosthodontics: A Review of the Available Streams. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1155/2014/783948
- The paper
- Abduo, J., Lyons, K., & Bennamoun, M. (2014). Trends in Computer-Aided Manufacturing in Prosthodontics: A Review of the Available Streams. International Journal of Dentistry. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/783948
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.