Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 267

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Erratum to “Biodistribution and SPECT Imaging Study of 99 m Tc Labeling NGR Peptide in Nude Mice Bearing Human HepG2 Hepatoma”

Open access
Ma, Wenhui, Wang, Zhe, Yang, Weidong, Ma, Xiaowei, Kang, Fei, Wang, Jing·2014·BioMed Research International

Abstract

In the paper titled "Biodistribution and SPECT imaging study of 99 labeling NGR peptide in nude mice bearing human HepG2 hepatoma," there is a mistake in the chemical structure of the NGR sequence and it is corrected in Figure 1 below.There is also a number mistake in the part of Materials and Methods (2.4.Cell Culture and Animal Model) that the HepG2 tumor model was established by subcutaneous injection of 5 × 10 6 HepG2 tumor cells (0.1 mL) into the right upper flanks, but not 2 × 10 6 .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2014/798474

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Ma, W., Wang, Z., Yang, W., Ma, X., Kang, F., & Wang, J.
Venue
BioMed Research International
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-08-05
Volume
2014
Pages
1-2
ISSN
  • 1110-7243 (ISSN-L)
  • 2314-6133
  • 2314-6141
OpenAlex
W1508150867
Cited by
267
References
0
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.