Cited by 63Genetic diversity and population structureGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestockGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

Overview on the Role of Advance Genomics in Conservation Biology of Endangered Species

Open access
Khan, Suliman, Nabi, Ghulam, Ullah, Muhammad Wajid, Yousaf, Muhammad, Manan, Sehrish, Siddique, Rabeea, Hou, Hongwei·2016·International Journal of Genomics

Abstract

In the recent era, due to tremendous advancement in industrialization, pollution and other anthropogenic activities have created a serious scenario for biota survival. It has been reported that present biota is entering a “sixth” mass extinction, because of chronic exposure to anthropogenic activities. Various ex situ and in situ measures have been adopted for conservation of threatened and endangered plants and animal species; however, these have been limited due to various discrepancies associated with them. Current advancement in molecular technologies, especially, genomics, is playing a very crucial role in biodiversity conservation. Advance genomics helps in identifying the segments of genome responsible for adaptation. It can also improve our understanding about microevolution through a better understanding of selection, mutation, assertive matting, and recombination. Advance genomics helps in identifying genes that are essential for fitness and ultimately for developing modern and fast monitoring tools for endangered biodiversity. This review article focuses on the applications of advanced genomics mainly demographic, adaptive genetic variations, inbreeding, hybridization and introgression, and disease susceptibilities, in the conservation of threatened biota. In short, it provides the fundamentals for novice readers and advancement in genomics for the experts working for the conservation of endangered plant and animal species.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2016/3460416

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • High-quality reference genome assemblies are increasingly recognized as an important foundation of conservation genomics.

    “High-quality reference genome assemblies are increasingly recognized as an important foundation of conservation genomics84–91.”

    From Chromosomal-level reference genome assembly of muskox (Ovibos moschatus) from Banks Island in the Canadian Arctic, a resource for conservation genomics (2024) · cites this paper as [84]

    The Introduction and Section 3 describe genome sequencing and genomic approaches as increasingly useful for conserving endangered species. They do not specifically identify high-quality reference genome assemblies as a foundation of conservation genomics or discuss assembly quality. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 72 · Cited by 63

Research works printed but not linked: 71

  1. [1]De Vos J. M. Joppa L. N. Gittleman J. L. Stephens P. R. Pimm S. L. Estimating the normal background rate of species extinction Conservation Biology 2015 29 2 452 462 10.1111/cobi.12380 2-s2.0-84924622832 25159086 25159086 · DOI
  2. [3]Sodhi N. S. Brook B. W. Corey Bradshaw J. A. Causes and consequences of species extinctions The Princeton Guide to Ecology 2009 1 Princeton University Press 514 520
  3. [5]May R. M. Ecological science and tomorrow's world Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2010 365 1537 41 47 10.1098/rstb.2009.0164 2-s2.0-75449094245 20008384 20008384 PMC2842703 · DOI · Paper page
  4. [7]Steadman D. W. Extinction and Biogeography of Tropical Pacific Birds 2006 Chicago, Ill, USA Chicago University Press
  5. [8]Pereira H. M. Leadley P. W. Proença V. Scenarios for global biodiversity in the 21st century Science 2010 330 6010 1496 1501 10.1126/science.1196624 2-s2.0-78650171292 20978282 20978282 · DOI · Paper page
  6. [10]Yule J. Fournier R. Hindmarsh P. Biodiversity, extinction, and humanity's future: the ecological and evolutionary consequences of human population and resource use Humanities 2013 2 2 147 159 10.3390/h2020147 · DOI
  7. [12]Johnson W. E. Koepfli K. The role of genomics in conservation and reproductive sciences Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology 2014 753 71 96 10.1007/978-1-4939-0820-2-5 2-s2.0-84906890405 25091907 25091907 · DOI
  8. [13]Miller M. R. Brunelli J. P. Wheeler P. A. A conserved haplotype controls parallel adaptation in geographically distant salmonid populations Molecular Ecology 2012 21 2 237 249 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05305.x 2-s2.0-84855456602 21988725 21988725 PMC3664428 · DOI
  9. [14]Ouborg N. J. Angeloni F. Vergeer P. An essay on the necessity and feasibility of conservation genomics Conservation Genetics 2010 11 2 643 653 10.1007/s10592-009-0016-9 2-s2.0-77951986461 · DOI
  10. [15]Rawat U. S. Agarwal N. K. Biodiversity: concept, threats and conservation Environment Conservation Journal 2015 16 19 28
  11. [17]Rao V. R. Hodgkin T. Genetic diversity and conservation and utilization of plant genetic resources Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 2002 68 1 1 19 10.1023/a:1013359015812 2-s2.0-0036175458 · DOI
  12. [20]Hieter P. Boguski M. Functional genomics: it's all how you read it Science 1997 278 5338 601 602 10.1126/science.278.5338.601 2-s2.0-0030725715 9381168 · DOI
  13. [22]McKusick V. A. HUGO news. The human genome organisation: history, purposes, and membership Genomics 1989 5 2 385 387 10.1016/0888-7543(89)90077-3 2-s2.0-0024712601 2676842 · DOI
  14. [23]Steiner C. C. Putnam A. S. Hoeck P. E. A. Ryder O. A. Conservation genomics of threatened animal species Annual Review of Animal Biosciences 2013 1 261 281 10.1146/annurev-animal-031412-103636 2-s2.0-84893741469 25387020 · DOI
  15. [24]Grueber C. E. Comparative genomics for biodiversity conservation Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal 2015 13 370 375 10.1016/j.csbj.2015.05.003 2-s2.0-84948764140 26106461 PMC4475778 · DOI
  16. [25]Li S. Li B. Cheng C. Genomic signatures of near-extinction and rebirth of the crested ibis and other endangered bird species Genome Biology 2014 15 12 557 572 10.1186/preaccept-2051958771459391 25496777 PMC4290368 · DOI
  17. [26]Mcmahon B. J. Teeling E. C. Höglund J. How and why should we implement genomics into conservation? Evolutionary Applications 2014 7 9 999 1007 10.1111/eva.12193 2-s2.0-84911885318 25553063 PMC4231591 · DOI
  18. [27]Wayne R. K. Morin P. A. Conservation genetics in the new molecular age Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2004 2 2 89 97 10.1890/1540-9295(2004)002[0089:CGITNM]2.0.CO;2 2-s2.0-20444442981 · DOI
  19. [28]Goddard M. E. Hayes B. J. Mapping genes for complex traits in domestic animals and their use in breeding programmes Nature Reviews Genetics 2009 10 6 381 391 10.1038/nrg2575 2-s2.0-66249122107 19448663 19448663 · DOI
  20. [29]Avise J. C. Perspective: conservation genetics enters the genomics era Conservation Genetics 2010 11 2 665 669 10.1007/s10592-009-0006-y 2-s2.0-77952096515 · DOI
  21. [30]Wilding C. S. Butlin R. K. Grahame J. Differential gene exchange between parapatric morphs of Littorina saxatilis detected using AFLP markers Journal of Evolutionary Biology 2001 14 4 611 619 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2001.00304.x 2-s2.0-0034886335 · DOI
  22. [31]Locke D. P. Hillier L. W. Warren W. C. Comparative and demographic analysis of orang-utan genomes Nature 2011 469 7331 529 533 10.1038/nature09687 21270892 PMC3060778 · DOI
  23. [32]Black W. C. IV Baer C. F. Antolin M. F. DuTeau N. M. Population genomics: genome-wide sampling of insect populations Annual Review of Entomology 2001 46 441 469 10.1146/annurev.ento.46.1.441 2-s2.0-0035045933 11112176 · DOI
  24. [33]Stumpf M. P. H. Haplotype diversity and the block structure of linkage disequilibrium Trends in Genetics 2002 18 5 226 228 10.1016/S0168-9525(02)02641-0 2-s2.0-0036574859 12047937 12047937 · DOI
  25. [34]Allendorf F. W. Hohenlohe P. A. Luikart G. Genomics and the future of conservation genetics Nature Reviews Genetics 2010 11 10 697 709 10.1038/nrg2844 2-s2.0-77956864581 20847747 20847747 · DOI
  26. [35]Manel S. Joost S. Epperson B. K. Perspectives on the use of landscape genetics to detect genetic adaptive variation in the field Molecular Ecology 2010 19 17 3760 3772 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04717.x 2-s2.0-77956087880 20723056 20723056 · DOI
  27. [36]Hoffmann A. A. Sgró C. M. Climate change and evolutionary adaptation Nature 2011 470 7335 479 485 10.1038/nature09670 2-s2.0-79952128475 21350480 21350480 · DOI
  28. [37]Crandall K. A. Bininda-Emonds O. R. R. Mace G. M. Wayne R. K. Considering evolutionary processes in conservation biology Trends in Ecology and Evolution 2000 15 7 290 295 10.1016/S0169-5347(00)01876-0 2-s2.0-0034237782 10856956 · DOI
  29. [38]Stinchcombe J. R. Hoekstra H. E. Combining population genomics and quantitative genetics: finding the genes underlying ecologically important traits Heredity 2008 100 2 158 170 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800937 2-s2.0-38549103015 17314923 · DOI · Paper page
  30. [39]Protas M. Tabansky I. Conrad M. Multi-trait evolution in a cave fish, Astyanax mexicanus Evolution and Development 2008 10 2 196 209 10.1111/j.1525-142X.2008.00227.x 2-s2.0-40349088705 18315813 18315813 · DOI
  31. [40]Steiner C. C. Weber J. N. Hoekstra H. E. Adaptive variation in beach mice produced by two interacting pigmentation genes PLOS Biology 2007 5 9 1880 1889 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050219 2-s2.0-34548694067 PMC1945039 17696646 · DOI
  32. [41]Schielzeth H. Forstmeier W. Kempenaers B. Ellegren H. QTL linkage mapping of wing length in zebra finch using genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphisms markers Molecular Ecology 2012 21 2 329 339 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05365.x 2-s2.0-84855452498 22111790 22111790 · DOI
  33. [44]Borlaug N. E. Sixty-two years of fighting hunger: personal recollections Euphytica 2007 157 3 287 297 10.1007/s10681-007-9480-9 2-s2.0-34548596595 · DOI
  34. [45]Peterson B. K. Weber J. N. Kay E. H. Fisher H. S. Hoekstra H. E. Double digest RADseq: an inexpensive method for de novo SNP discovery and genotyping in model and non-model species PLOS ONE 2012 7 5 e37135 10.1371/journal.pone.0037135 2-s2.0-84861691274 PMC3365034 22675423 · DOI
  35. [46]Anderson T. M. vonHoldt B. M. Candille S. I. Molecular and evolutionary history of melanism in North American gray wolves Science 2009 323 5919 1339 1343 10.1126/science.1165448 2-s2.0-62149151949 19197024 PMC2903542 · DOI · Paper page
  36. [47]Johnson H. E. Mills L. S. Wehausen J. D. Stephenson T. R. Luikart G. Translating effects of inbreeding depression on component vital rates to overall population growth in endangered bighorn sheep Conservation Biology 2011 25 6 1240 1249 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01739.x 2-s2.0-80955166506 22070275 · DOI
  37. [48]Linnen C. R. Kingsley E. P. Jensen J. D. Hoekstra H. E. On the origin and spread of an adaptive allele in deer mice Science 2009 325 5944 1095 1098 10.1126/science.1175826 2-s2.0-69549110251 19713521 19713521 PMC2736094 · DOI
  38. [49]Hohenlohe P. A. Bassham S. Etter P. D. Stiffler N. Johnson E. A. Cresko W. A. Population genomics of parallel adaptation in threespine stickleback using sequenced RAD tags PLoS Genetics 2010 6 2 e1000862 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000862 2-s2.0-77649219524 PMC2829049 20195501 · DOI
  39. [50]Renaut S. Bernatchez L. Transcriptome-wide signature of hybrid breakdown associated with intrinsic reproductive isolation in lake whitefish species pairs (Coregonus spp. Salmonidae) Heredity 2011 106 6 1003 1011 10.1038/hdy.2010.149 2-s2.0-79956347096 21119703 PMC3186247 · DOI
  40. [51]Hunter B. Wright K. M. Bomblies K. Short read sequencing in studies of natural variation and adaptation Current Opinion in Plant Biology 2013 16 1 85 91 10.1016/j.pbi.2012.10.003 2-s2.0-84873731493 23177206 23177206 · DOI
  41. [52]Hwang E.-Y. Song Q. Jia G. A genome-wide association study of seed protein and oil content in soybean BMC Genomics 2014 15, article 1 12 10.1186/1471-2164-15-1 2-s2.0-84891810256 24382143 PMC3890527 · DOI
  42. [53]Stranger B. E. Stahl E. A. Raj T. Progress and promise of genome-wide association studies for human complex trait genetics Genetics 2011 187 2 367 383 10.1534/genetics.110.120907 2-s2.0-79951521421 21115973 21115973 PMC3030483 · DOI · Paper page
  43. [54]Ujvari B. Belov K. Major histocompatibility complex (MHC) markers in conservation biology International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2011 12 8 5168 5186 10.3390/ijms12085168 2-s2.0-80052185781 21954351 21954351 PMC3179158 · DOI · Paper page
  44. [55]Aguilar A. Roemer G. Debenham S. Binns M. Garcelon D. Wayne R. K. High MHC diversity maintained by balancing selection in an otherwise genetically monomorphic mammal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2004 101 10 3490 3494 10.1073/pnas.0306582101 2-s2.0-1542723469 14990802 14990802 PMC373489 · DOI
  45. [56]Keller L. F. Waller D. M. Inbreeding effects in wild populations Trends in Ecology and Evolution 2002 17 5 230 241 10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02489-8 2-s2.0-0036568655 · DOI
  46. [57]Charlier C. Coppieters W. Rollin F. Highly effective SNP-based association mapping and management of recessive defects in livestock Nature Genetics 2008 40 4 449 454 10.1038/ng.96 2-s2.0-40849110768 18344998 18344998 · DOI
  47. [58]Paige K. N. The functional genomics of inbreeding depression: a new approach to an old problem BioScience 2010 60 4 267 277 10.1525/bio.2010.60.4.5 2-s2.0-77950936619 · DOI
  48. [59]Charlesworth D. Willis J. H. The genetics of inbreeding depression Nature Reviews Genetics 2009 10 11 783 796 10.1038/nrg2664 2-s2.0-70350048798 19834483 19834483 · DOI
  49. [60]Charlesworth D. Charlesworth B. Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1987 18 237 268 2-s2.0-0023468755
  50. [61]Barrett S. C. H. Kohn J. R. Falk D. A. Holsinger K. E. Genetic and evolutionary consequences of small population size in plants: implications for conservation Genetics and Conservation of Rare Plants 1991 New York, NY, USA Oxford University Press 3 30
  51. [62]Mooney E. H. McGraw J. B. Effects of self-pollination and outcrossing with cultivated plants in small natural populations of american ginseng, Panax quinquefolius (Araliaceae) American Journal of Botany 2007 94 10 1677 1687 10.3732/ajb.94.10.1677 2-s2.0-35348967329 21636364 · DOI
  52. [63]Rieseberg L. H. Evolution: replacing genes and traits through hybridization Current Biology 2009 19 3 R119 R122 10.1016/j.cub.2008.12.016 2-s2.0-59349107762 19211049 · DOI
  53. [64]Lowe V. P. Gardiner A. S. Hybridization between Red deer (Cervus elaphus) and Sika deer (Cervus nippon) with particular reference to stocks in N.W. England Journal of Zoology 1975 177 4 553 566 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1975.tb02259.x · DOI
  54. [65]Rhymer J. M. Simberloff D. Extinction by hybridization and introgression Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1996 27 83 109 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.27.1.83 2-s2.0-0030304977 · DOI
  55. [66]MacPhee R. D. Greenwood A. D. Infectious Disease, Endangerment, and Extinction International Journal of Evolutionary Biology 2013 2013 9 571939 10.1155/2013/571939 PMC3562694 23401844 · DOI
  56. [67]Smith K. F. Sax D. F. Lafferty K. D. Evidence for the role of infectious disease in species extinction and endangerment Conservation Biology 2006 20 5 1349 1357 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00524.x 2-s2.0-33748929691 17002752 17002752 · DOI · Paper page
  57. [68]Pedersen A. B. Jones K. E. Nunn C. L. Altizer S. Infectious diseases and extinction risk in wild mammals Conservation Biology 2007 21 5 1269 1279 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00776.x 2-s2.0-34648834679 17883492 17883492 PMC7202242 · DOI
  58. [69]Weatherall D. Clegg J. Kwiatkowski D. The role of genomics in studying genetic susceptibility to infectious disease Genome Research 1997 7 10 967 973 2-s2.0-0030663851 9331367 9331367
  59. [70]Garrod A. E. The Inborn Factors in Disease 1931 Oxford, UK Oxford University Press
  60. [71]Hill A. V. S. Genetics and genomics of infectious disease susceptibility British Medical Bulletin 1999 55 2 401 413 10.1258/0007142991902457 2-s2.0-0032858072 10723865 10723865 · DOI
  61. [72]Savage A. E. Zamudio K. R. MHC genotypes associate with resistance to a frog-killing fungus Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2011 108 40 16705 16710 10.1073/pnas.1106893108 2-s2.0-80053627099 21949385 21949385 PMC3189034 · DOI
  62. [73]Romanov M. N. Koriabine M. Nefedov M. de Jong P. J. Ryder O. A. Construction of a California condor BAC library and first-generation chicken-condor comparative physical map as an endangered species conservation genomics resource Genomics 2006 88 6 711 718 10.1016/j.ygeno.2006.06.005 2-s2.0-33750941044 16884891 16884891 · DOI
  63. [74]Roelke-Parker M. E. Munson L. Packer C. A canine distemper virus epidemic in Serengeti lions (Panthera leo) Nature 1998 379 441 445 10.1038/379441a0 PMC7095363 8559247 · DOI
  64. [75]Williams E. S. Thorne E. T. Appel M. J. Belitsky D. W. Canine distemper in black-footed ferrets (Mustela nigripes) from Wyoming Journal of wildlife diseases 1988 24 3 385 398 10.7589/0090-3558-24.3.385 2-s2.0-0024044685 3411697 · DOI
  65. [76]Leroy E. M. Telfer P. Kumulungui B. A serological survey of ebola virus infection in central African nonhuman primates Journal of Infectious Diseases 2004 190 11 1895 1899 10.1086/425421 2-s2.0-9444274144 15529251 15529251 · DOI
  66. [77]Pearse A.-M. Swift K. Allograft theory: transmission of devil facial-tumour disease Nature 2006 439, article 549 10.1038/439549a 2-s2.0-31844442380 16452970 · DOI
  67. [78]Hanger J. J. Bromham L. D. Mckee J. J. O'Brien T. M. Robinson W. F. The nucleotide sequence of koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) retrovirus: a novel type C endogenous virus related to gibbon ape leukemia virus Journal of Virology 2000 74 9 4264 4272 10.1128/jvi.74.9.4264-4272.2000 2-s2.0-0034004490 10756041 PMC111943 · DOI
  68. [79]Jackson M. White N. Giffard P. Timms P. Epizootiology of Chlamydia infections in two free-range koala populations Veterinary Microbiology 1999 65 4 255 264 10.1016/s0378-1135(98)00302-2 2-s2.0-0032998320 10223324 · DOI
  69. [80]MacPhee R. D. E. Greenwood A. D. Infectious disease, endangerment, and extinction International Journal of Evolutionary Biology 2013 2013 9 571939 10.1155/2013/571939 PMC3562694 23401844 · DOI
  70. [82]Shapiro B. Mammoth 2.0: will genome engineering resurrect extinct species? Genome Biology 2015 16 1, article 228 10.1186/s13059-015-0800-4 2-s2.0-84946716449 PMC4632474 26530525 · DOI
  71. [83]Frankham R. Ballou J. D. Dudash M. R. Implications of different species concepts for conserving biodiversity Biological Conservation 2012 153 25 31 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.04.034 2-s2.0-84862744497 · DOI

Authors
Khan, S., Nabi, G., Ullah, M. W., Yousaf, M., Manan, S., Siddique, R., & Hou, H.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Huazhong University of Science and Technology (CN)
  • Huazhong Agricultural University (CN)
  • The University of Agriculture, Peshawar (PK)
  • The Key Laboratory of Aquatic Biodiversity and Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430072, China
Venue
International Journal of Genomics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016
Volume
2016
Pages
1-8
ISSN
  • 2314-436X (ISSN-L)
  • 2314-4378
OpenAlex
W2559685457
Cited by
63
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Genomics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Institute of Hydrobiology, CAS Institutional Repository (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
conservation genomics, threatened species, biodiversity conservation, adaptive genetic variation, inbreeding, hybridization, introgression, disease susceptibility, microevolution, sixth mass extinction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review