The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Three-Class Mammogram Classification Based on Descriptive CNN Features
Open accessAbstract
In this paper, a novel classification technique for large data set of mammograms using a deep learning method is proposed. The proposed model targets a three-class classification study (normal, malignant, and benign cases). In our model we have presented two methods, namely, convolutional neural network-discrete wavelet (CNN-DW) and convolutional neural network-curvelet transform (CNN-CT). An augmented data set is generated by using mammogram patches. To enhance the contrast of mammogram images, the data set is filtered by contrast limited adaptive histogram equalization (CLAHE). In the CNN-DW method, enhanced mammogram images are decomposed as its four subbands by means of two-dimensional discrete wavelet transform (2D-DWT), while in the second method discrete curvelet transform (DCT) is used. In both methods, dense scale invariant feature (DSIFT) for all subbands is extracted. Input data matrix containing these subband features of all the mammogram patches is created that is processed as input to convolutional neural network (CNN). Softmax layer and support vector machine (SVM) layer are used to train CNN for classification. Proposed methods have been compared with existing methods in terms of accuracy rate, error rate, and various validation assessment measures. CNN-DW and CNN-CT have achieved accuracy rate of 81.83% and 83.74%, respectively. Simulation results clearly validate the significance and impact of our proposed model as compared to other well-known existing techniques.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints
Lowe, D. G. (2004) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1023/b:visi.0000029664.99615.94 · Cited by 55,589
Fast Discrete Curvelet Transforms
Candès, E., Demanet, L., Donoho, D., & Ying, L. (2006) · Multiscale Modeling & Simulation · doi:10.1137/05064182x · Cited by 2,573
Cited by
Deep convolutional neural networks for mammography: advances, challenges and applications
Abdelhafiz, D., Yang, C., Ammar, R., & Nabavi, S. (2019) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-019-2823-4 · Cited by 274
Breast Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Using Mammographic Data: Systematic Review
Gardezi, S. J. S., Elazab, A., Lei, B., & Wang, T. (2019) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/14464 · Cited by 268
Marya, N. B., Powers, P. D., Chari, S. T., Gleeson, F. C., Leggett, C. L., Abu Dayyeh, B. K., Chandrasekhara, V., Iyer, P. G., Majumder, S., Pearson, R. K., et al. (2021) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2020-322821 · Cited by 146
Diagnosis of breast cancer for modern mammography using artificial intelligence
Karthiga, R., Narasimhan, K., & Amirtharajan, R. (2022) · Mathematics and Computers in Simulation · doi:10.1016/j.matcom.2022.05.038 · Cited by 46
RAMS: Remote and automatic mammogram screening
Cogan, T., Cogan, M., & Tamil, L. (2019) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2019.01.024 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Jadoon, M. M., Zhang, Q., Haq, I. U., Butt, S., & Jadoon, A.
- Venue
- BioMed Research International
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017
- Volume
- 2017
- Pages
- 1-11
- ISSN
- 1110-7243 (ISSN-L)
- 2314-6133
- 2314-6141
- OpenAlex
- W2573215997
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Three-Class Mammogram Classification Based on Descriptive CNN Features. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1155/2017/3640901
- The paper
- Jadoon, M. M., Zhang, Q., Haq, I. U., Butt, S., & Jadoon, A. (2017). Three-Class Mammogram Classification Based on Descriptive CNN Features. BioMed Research International. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3640901
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.