Cited by 248Phytochemicals and Antioxidant ActivitiesAgricultural and Biological ResearchMedicinal Plant Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Impact of Different Extraction Solvents on Bioactive Compounds and Antioxidant Capacity from the Root of Salacia chinensis L.

Open access

Abstract

This study aimed to study the impact of selected common organic solvents on extractable solids, phytochemical composition, and antioxidant capacity of S. chinensis. The results showed that the tested solvents played an important role in extraction of total solid and phytochemical composition as well as antioxidant capacity of S. chinensis. Acetone (50% v/v) was found to be the optimal extraction solvent for extractable solids (12.2%), phenolic compounds (60 mg GAE/g DW), flavonoids (100 mg CE/g DW), proanthocyanidins (47.4 mg CE/g DW), and saponins (754 mg EE/g DW) as well as antioxidant capacity (ABTS 334 mM TE/g DW, DPPH 470 mM TE/g DW, FRAP 347 mM TE/g DW, and CUPRAC 310 mM TE/g DW). The extract prepared from 50% acetone had high levels of bioactive compounds (TPC 555 mg GAE/g CRE, flavonoids 819 mg CE/g CRE, proanthocyanidins 392 mg CE/g CRE, and saponins 1,880 mg EE/g CRE) as well as antioxidant capacity (ABTS 414 mM TE/g, DPPH 407 mM TE/g, FRAP 320 mg TE/g, and CUPRAC 623 mM TE/g), thus further confirming that 50% acetone is the solvent of choice. Therefore, 50% acetone is recommended for extraction of phenolic compounds, their secondary metabolites, saponins, and antioxidant capacity from the root of S. chinensis for further isolation and utilisation.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2017/9305047

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.08.028 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.jep.2004.10.026 · DOI
  3. 2014, Bioresearch Bulletin, 4
  4. 10.4103/0253-7613.91875 · DOI
  5. 10.1007/s13562-012-0169-3 · DOI
  6. 10.1080/23311932.2015.1115646 · DOI
  7. 10.1080/10826076.2014.999199 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.sjbs.2015.08.002 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2011.12.026 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.hermed.2013.04.004 · DOI
  11. 10.3390/pr4010002 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.jfca.2006.01.003 · DOI
  13. 10.1021/jf048741x · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.jfda.2013.11.001 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.12.028 · DOI
  16. 10.1080/14786419.2014.905562 · DOI
  17. 10.4103/0973-1296.90414 · DOI
  18. 10.3923/ijps.2014.347.352 · DOI
  19. 2011, Journal of Medicinal Plants Research, 5, 2322
  20. 10.3390/antiox3040814 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.hermed.2014.04.003 · DOI
  22. 10.1111/ijfs.12915 · DOI
  23. 10.1111/ijfs.12618 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ngo, T. V., Scarlett, C. J., Bowyer, M. C., Ngo, P. D., & Vuong, Q. V.
Affiliations
  • Vietnam National University of Forestry (VN)
  • University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
  • Investment and Development of Southern Herb JSC, Quynh Luu District, Nghe An Province, Vietnam
Corresponding author
  • Ngo, Thanh Van
  • Vuong, Quan Van
Venue
Journal of Food Quality
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017
Volume
2017
Pages
1-8
ISSN
  • 0146-9428 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-4557
OpenAlex
W2577924643
Cited by
248
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4
FWCI
12.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Food Quality (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Bộ Giáo dục và Ðào tạo
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry (medical) › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural and Biological Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Medicinal Plant Research
Keywords
Salacia chinensis, root extract, solvent extraction, acetone, phenolic compounds, flavonoids, proanthocyanidins, saponins, antioxidant capacity, total phenolic content, phytochemical composition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review