Cited by 102Blockchain Technology Applications and SecurityCryptography and Data SecurityCloud Data Security Solutions

Bads: blockchain-based architecture for data sharing with abs and cp-abe in IoT

Open access
Zhang, Yunru, He, Debiao, Choo, Kim-Kwang Raymond·2018·Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing

Abstract

Internet of Things (IoT) and cloud computing are increasingly integrated, in the sense that data collected from IoT devices (generally with limited computational and storage resources) are being sent to the cloud for processing, etc., in order to inform decision making and facilitate other operational and business activities. However, the cloud may not be a fully trusted entity, like leaking user data or compromising user privacy. Thus, we propose a privacy‐preserving and user‐controlled data sharing architecture with fine‐grained access control, based on the blockchain model and attribute‐based cryptosystem. Also, the consensus algorithm in our system is the Byzantine fault tolerance mechanism, rather than Proof of Work.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2018/2783658

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The security of smart contracts, regarded as core software on blockchain, is important because a small bug or attack can result in significant issues such as privacy leakage or system logic modifications.

    “In addition, the security aspect of smart contract, which is regarded as core software on blockchain, is also very important since a small bug or attack can result in significant issues like privacy leakage or system logic modifications [297], [298].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 22 · Cited by 102

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. K. H. Maji, M. Prabhakaran, and M. Rosulek, "Attribute-based signatures, " IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive, vol. 2010, article 595, 2010.
  2. N. Szabo, "The idea of smart contracts, " Nick Szabos Papers and Concise Tutorials, vol. 6, 1997.

Authors
Zhang, Y., He, D., & Choo, K.-K. R.
Affiliations
  • Wuhan University (CN)
  • The University of Texas at San Antonio (US)
Corresponding author
He, Debiao
Venue
Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-01
Volume
2018
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 1530-8669 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-8677
OpenAlex
W2898930836
Cited by
102
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 10
FWCI
18.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (61572370, 61572379, 61501333)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptography and Data Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cloud Data Security Solutions
Keywords
blockchain, data sharing, attribute-based encryption, ciphertext-policy attribute-based encryption, Internet of Things, privacy preservation, fine-grained access control, Byzantine fault tolerance, consensus algorithms, cloud data security

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review