Cited by 8Advanced Battery Technologies ResearchReliability and Maintenance OptimizationAdvancements in Battery Materials

Reliability Evaluation and In-Orbit Residual Life Prediction for Satellite Lithium-Ion Batteries

Open access
Yu, Bin, Zhang, Tao, Liu, Tianyu, Yao, Lei·2018·Mathematical Problems in Engineering

Abstract

As a new type of secondary battery, lithium-ion battery is widely used in the aerospace industry with the advantages of long lifetime, high energy density and low pollution, etc. In this paper, we focus on the problem of offline and online life prediction for satellite lithium-ion batteries. Firstly, based on the NASA laboratory battery dataset, a Wiener process with time-scale transformation is used to capture battery capacity fading, and then the battery reliability point and interval estimation equation are derived, respectively. Secondly, by analyzing the charge and discharge profiles of the batteries in orbit environments, an accurate capacity prediction model is proposed based on the partial charging curves. Finally, the Bayesian framework is used to perform capacity degradation model online updating, and the analytical expression of residual life distribution is derived to achieve RL prediction for in-orbit satellite lithium-ion batteries.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2018/5918068

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Li-ion batteries have very high round trip efficiency and more than ten years of successful space application history.

    “Li-ion batteries have very high round trip efficiency and more than ten years of successful space application history, which is more than sufficient to consider this technology adequate to use onboard a lunar base [27,34,41].”

    From Parametric Study of a Lunar Base Power Systems (2021) · cites this paper as [41]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) describes successful use of lithium-ion batteries in satellites launched from 2000 onward, supporting more than ten years of space-application history by the paper’s 2018 publication. It discusses energy density and other advantages, but does not establish very high round-trip efficiency. The lunar-base conclusion is the citing authors’ inference, not a finding attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • For Earth orbit satellites, ensuring reliability and safety requires the DOD of Li-ion batteries to be limited to about 40%.

    “For Earth orbit satellites, where long life cycles (>30,000 cycles) are expected [85], ensuring reliability and safety requires the DOD of Li-ion batteries to be limited to about 40% [41].”

    From Parametric Study of a Lunar Base Power Systems (2021) · cites this paper as [41]

  • For both types of batteries, energy efficiency of the discharge cycle and specific power are discharge-rate dependent.

    “In the case of both types of batteries, energy efficiency of the discharge cycle as well as their specific power are discharge-rate dependent.”

    From Parametric Study of a Lunar Base Power Systems (2021) · cites this paper as [41]

    The Introduction says a high current rate can cause capacity underestimation, and Section 3.1 says discharge current varies between orbital cycles. Neither passage addresses discharge-cycle energy efficiency or specific power for two battery types. Searches for those terms and their discharge-rate relationship found no supporting passage in our copy; page numbers were unavailable. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In general, the lower the discharge rate, the higher the discharge-cycle energy efficiency.

    “In general, the lower the discharge rate, the higher η dis value may be obtained [27,41,83].”

    From Parametric Study of a Lunar Base Power Systems (2021) · cites this paper as [41]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says a high current rate can cause capacity underestimation and accelerate battery aging. Section 3.1 (page unavailable) says discharge current varies with satellite loading. Neither passage addresses whether a lower discharge rate increases discharge-cycle energy efficiency; searches for discharge rate and energy efficiency found no such passage. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. X. Xi, W. Xu, X. Bai et al., "A smart remaining battery life prediction based on MARS, " in Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Power & Energy Society Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference (ISGT), pp. 1-5, Washington, DC, USA, Feburary 2014.
  2. S. J. Tang, C. Q. Yu, X. Wang, X. S. Guo, and X. S. Si, "Remaining useful life prediction of lithium-ion batteries based on the Wiener process with measurement error, " Energies, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 520-547, 2014.
  3. N. Williard, W. He, C. Hendricks, and M. Pecht, "Lessons learned from the 787 dreamliner issue on Lithium-Ion Battery reliability, " Energies, vol. 6, no. 9, pp. 4682-4695, 2013.
  4. H. P. Wu and Y. H. Luan, "An Efficient Estimation of the Mean Residual Life Function with Length-Biased Right-Censored Data, " Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2014, Article ID 937397, 5 pages, 2014.
  5. Y. Liu, B. He, F. Liu, S. Lu, Y. Zhao, and J. Zhao, "Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Rolling Bearings Using PSR, JADE, and Extreme Learning Machine, " Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2016, Article ID 8623530, 13 pages, 2016.
  6. G. Jin, D. E. Matthews, and Z. Zhou, "A Bayesian framework for on-line degradation assessment and residual life prediction of secondary batteries in spacecraft, " Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 113, no. 1, pp. 7-20, 2013.
  7. Y. Xing, E. W. M. Ma, K. Tsui, and M. Pecht, "An ensemble model for predicting the remaining useful performance of lithium-ion batteries, " Microelectronics Reliability, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 811-820, 2013.
  8. B. Saha and K. Goebel, "Modeling li-ion battery capacity depletion in a particle filtering framework, " in Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Prognostics and Health Management Society, p. 10, San Diego, CA, USA, 2009.
  9. A. Nuhic, T. Terzimehic, T. Soczka-Guth, M. Buchholz, and K. Dietmayer, "Health diagnosis and remaining useful life prog- nostics of lithium-ion batteries using data-driven methods, " Journal of Power Sources, vol. 239, no. 1, pp. 680-688, 2013.
  10. D. H. Liu, H. Wang, Y. Peng, W. Xie, and H. T. Liao, "Satellite lithium-ion battery remaining cycle life prediction with novel indirect health indicator extraction, " Energies, vol. 6, no. 8, pp. 3654-3668, 2013.
  11. T. Liu, Q. Sun, J. Feng, Z. Pan, and Q. Huangpeng, "Residual life estimation under time-varying conditions based on a Wiener process, " Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 211-226, 2017.
  12. H. Li, D. Pan, and C. L. P. Chen, "Reliability modeling and life estimation using an expectation maximization based wiener degradation model for momentum wheels, " IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 955-963, 2015.
  13. G. A. Whitmore and F. Schenkelberg, "Modelling accelerated degradation data using wiener diffusion with a time scale transformation, " Lifetime Data Analysis, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 27-45, 1997.
  14. T. Liu, Q. Sun, J. Meng, Z. Pan, and Y. Tang, "Degradation modeling of satellite thermal control coatings in a low earth orbit environment, " Solar Energy, vol. 139, pp. 467-474, 2016.
  15. J. Mark and M. A. Goldberg, "Multiple regression analysis and mass assessment: a review of the issues, " e Appraisal Journal, pp. 89-109, 2001.
  16. W. Wang, M. Carr, W. Xu, and K. Kobbacy, "A model for residual life prediction based on Brownian motion with an adaptive drift, " Microelectronics Reliability, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 285-293, 2011.
  17. X. S. Si, W. Wang, C. H. Hu, D. H. Zhou, and M. G. Pecht, "Remaining useful life estimation based on a nonlinear diffu- sion degradation process, " IEEE Transactions on Reliability, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 50-67, 2012.
  18. X. S. Si, W. Wang, M. Y. Chen, C. H. Hu, and D. H. Zhou, "A degradation path-dependent approach for remaining useful life estimation with an exact and closed-form solution, " European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 226, no. 1, pp. 53-66, 2013.
  19. X. Wang, N. Balakrishnan, and B. Guo, "Residual life estimation based on a generalized Wiener degradation process, " Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 124, pp. 13-23, 2014.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yu, B., Zhang, T., Liu, T., & Yao, L.
Affiliations
  • College of System Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha, China
  • National University of Defense Technology (CN)
Venue
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-12-06
Volume
2018
Pages
1-12
ISSN
  • 1024-123X (ISSN-L)
  • 1563-5147
OpenAlex
W2903401745
Cited by
8
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Mathematical Problems in Engineering (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Advanced Battery Technologies Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Reliability and Maintenance Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Battery Materials
Keywords
remaining useful life prediction, battery reliability, capacity fade, Brownian motion, time scale transformation, on-orbit operations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review