Cited by 11Medicinal Plant Extracts EffectsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMedicinal Plants and Bioactive Compounds

Galphimine-B standardized extract versus alprazolam in patients with generalized anxiety disorder: A ten-week, double-blind, randomized clinical trial

Open access
Romero-Cerecero, Ofelia, Islas-Garduño, Ana Laura, Zamilpa, Alejandro, Herrera-Arellano, Armando, Jiménez-Ferrer, Enrique, Tortoriello, Jaime·2019·BioMed Research International

Abstract

, has been shown to possess important anxiolytic activity. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness and tolerability of a G-B standardized extract (experimental treatment) that was administered daily for 10 weeks in patients with moderate or severe Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD). Alprazolam was used as control treatment and administered under the same conditions. A total of 167 patients were included. At the start of the study, the severe anxiety condition prevailed, with an average on the Hamilton Anxiety Scale of 35.1 ± 8.8 and 35.8 ± 8.1 points in the control and experimental groups, respectively. After the 10 weeks of administration, the average was reduced in the control group to 4.6 ± 6.5 points and in the experimental group to 3.5 ± 5.5 points. Therapeutic success in the control group was 85.7% and in the experimental group, 92.0%. A high proportion of patients (22.2%) treated with Alprazolam manifested daytime sleepiness, while in the group treated with the G-B standardized extract, daytime sleepiness was found in 4.7%. In conclusion, a G-B standardized extract demonstrated therapeutic effectiveness in patients with GAD, without exhibiting significant difference with Alprazolam, but showing fewer cases of daytime sleepiness. The trial was registered at http://clinicaltrials.gov by identifier: NCT03702803.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2019/1037036

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A standardised extract containing 0.374 mg of Galphimine-B per dose demonstrated similar efficacy in reducing anxiety, but better tolerability after four and 10 weeks of treatment as compared with the active comparators lorazepam and alprazolam.

    “It was reported that the standardised extract containing 0.374 mg of Galphimine-B per dose demonstrated similar efficacy in reducing anxiety, but better tolerability after four and 10 weeks of treatment as compared with the active comparators lorazepam and alprazolam (Herrera-Arellano et al., 2007;Romero-Cerecero et al., 2019).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [9]Estrada E. Jardín Botánico De Plantas Medicinales Maximino Martínez pp. 15, 1985 Mexico UACH, Ed., Departamento de Fitotecnia

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Romero-Cerecero, O., Islas-Garduño, A. L., Zamilpa, A., Herrera-Arellano, A., Jiménez-Ferrer, E., & Tortoriello, J.
Affiliations
  • Centro de Investigación Biomédica del Sur, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (CIBIS-IMSS), Xochitepec, Morelos, Mexico
  • Mexican Social Security Institute (MX)
  • Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos (MX)
Corresponding author
Tortoriello, Jaime
Venue
BioMed Research International
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-01-30
Volume
2019
Pages
1-9
ISSN
  • 1110-7243 (ISSN-L)
  • 2314-6133
  • 2314-6141
OpenAlex
W2914509438
Cited by
11
References
12
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BioMed Research International (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (2015-CO1-261591)
  • IMSS-Foundation (2015-CO1-261591)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Medicinal Plant Extracts Effects
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Medicinal Plants and Bioactive Compounds
Keywords
standardized herbal extract, generalized anxiety disorder, alprazolam, anxiolytic effects, daytime sleepiness, tolerability, herbal medicine
MeSH terms
Patient Health Questionnaire, Alprazolam, Anxiety Disorders, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Plant Extracts, Triterpenes, Galphimia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review