Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 32

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dietary Iron Intake in Women of Reproductive Age in Europe: A Review of 49 Studies from 29 Countries in the Period 1993–2015

Milman, Nils Thorm·2019·Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism

Abstract

Objective. Assessment of dietary iron intake in women of reproductive age in Europe. Design. Review. Setting. Literature search of dietary surveys reporting intake of iron using PubMed, Internet browsers, and national nutrient databases in the period 1993–2015. Subjects. Women of reproductive age. Results. 49 dietary surveys/studies in 29 European countries were included. Belgium, Bosnia, Denmark, Hungary, Italy, Northern Ireland, Serbia, Scotland, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom/England, and Wales reported a median/mean iron intake of 7.6–9.9 mg/day. Finland, Iceland, Ireland, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, and Spain reported an intake of 10.0–10.7 mg/day. Austria, Estonia, France, and Russia reported an intake of 11.0–11.9 mg/day. Latvia and Germany reported an intake of 12.0–12.2 mg/day. Croatia, Lithuania, Portugal, and Slovakia reported an intake of 15.9–19.0 mg/day. The percentage of dietary iron consisting of heme iron, reported in 7 studies, varied from 4.3% in United Kingdom to 25% in Spain. Nutrient density for iron (mg iron/10 MJ, median/mean) varied from 11.8 in Sweden to 23.0 in Lithuania. The correlation between nutrient density and dietary iron was significant (p=0.0006). In most countries, the majority of women had a dietary iron intake below 15 mg/day. In Belgium, Denmark, Hungary, and Sweden, 91–95% of women had an intake below 15 mg/day. In Ireland and Germany, 61–78% had an intake below 15 mg/day. Conclusions. In Europe, 61–97% of women have a dietary iron intake below 15 mg/day. This contributes to a low iron status in many women. We need common European standardized dietary methods, uniform dietary reference values, and uniform statistical methods to perform intercountry comparisons.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2019/7631306

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. 10.3945/ajcn.117.155804 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.3109/00016346409155829 · DOI
  3. 10.3109/00016349309021150 · DOI
  4. 10.1007/bf01698138 · DOI
  5. 10.1007/s00277-010-1144-5 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1007/s002770100371 · DOI
  7. 10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4254 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.2903/sp.efsa.2017.e15121 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1017/s0007114509990572 · DOI
  10. 10.17221/160/2013-cjfs · DOI
  11. 2016, The Belgian Food Consumption Survey
  12. 10.1159/000103278 · DOI
  13. 2016, The belgian food consumption survey 2014-2015
  14. 2016, Procedia–Social and Behavioral Sciences, 217, 1071, 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.02.112 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1080/09637480701252393 · DOI
  16. 10.1007/s00394-003-0425-3 · DOI
  17. 2013, The national FINDIET 2012 survey
  18. 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600561 · DOI
  19. 10.1017/s0007114509992625 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601923 · DOI
  21. 10.1556/oh.2007.28017 · DOI
  22. 10.1556/oh.2012.29379 · DOI
  23. 2017, Orvosi Hetilap, 158, 803, 10.1556/650.2017.30773 · DOI
  24. 10.1017/s1368980009005035 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 1997, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 51, S51
  26. 2001, Public Health Nutrition, 4, 1183
  27. 10.1017/s1368980008003595 · DOI
  28. 10.2105/ajph.88.4.576 · DOI
  29. 10.1017/s1368980017001240 · DOI
  30. 10.1006/jfca.2002.1075 · DOI
  31. 10.1017/s1368980007000961 · DOI
  32. 10.3109/09637489709028573 · DOI
  33. 10.3390/nu9030203 · DOI
  34. 10.1186/s12884-014-0373-3 · DOI
  35. 2019, Food and nutrient intake in adults in Sweden 2010–2011
  36. 10.1017/s1368980013000207 · DOI
  37. 10.1017/s0007114511002340 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/j.ogc.2011.05.002 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 2010, European Food Safety Authority Journal, 8
  40. 10.1038/sj/ejcn/160143210.1038/sj.ejcn.1601422 · DOI
  41. 10.1038/ejcn.2015.159 · DOI
  42. 10.3402/fnr.v53i0.2038 · DOI
  43. 10.1093/ajcn/54.6.1047 · DOI
  44. 10.1034/j.1600-0609.2003.00090.x · DOI
  45. 10.1079/phn2001154 · DOI
  46. 10.1038/ejcn.2013.242 · DOI
  47. 10.3748/wjg.14.4101 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1093/jn/136.11.2808 · DOI
  49. 10.1159/000332129 · DOI

Cited by

See all 32

Metadata

Authors
Milman, N. T.
Affiliations
Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Næstved Hospital, University College Zealand, DK-4700 Næstved, Denmark
Venue
Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-06-13
Volume
2019
Pages
1-13
ISSN
  • 2090-0724
  • 2090-0732
Cited by
32
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.