Cited by 33Sports Performance and TrainingExercise and Physiological ResponsesCardiovascular and exercise physiology

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Diagnosis of Overtraining Syndrome: Results of the Endocrine and Metabolic Responses on Overtraining Syndrome Study: EROS-DIAGNOSIS

Open access
Cadegiani, Flavio Adsuara, da Silva, Pedro Henrique Luiz, Abrao, Tatiana Camargo Pereira, Kater, Claudio Elias·2020·Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract

Objectives. Overtraining syndrome (OTS), a common dysfunction among elite athletes, causes decreased performance and fatigue and has no standardized diagnostic criteria. The Endocrine and Metabolic Responses on Overtraining Syndrome (EROS) study identified more than 45 potential biomarkers of OTS. In the present study, we hypothesized that combinations of these biomarkers could be an accurate diagnostic tool for OTS. Methods. We selected parameters with largest difference and fewest overlapping results compared to healthy athletes and highest feasibility and reproducibility. Among the multiple combinations attempted, we chose those that did not show overlapping results, according to the objective. Results. We included 11 clinical parameters, 4 basal hormones, and 5 hormonal responses in Insulin Tolerance Test (ITT). The three selected diagnostic tools were the (i) EROS-CLINICAL, with only clinical parameters, which was suitable as an initial assessment for athletes suspected of OTS; (ii) EROS-SIMPLIFIED, with clinical parameters and basal hormones, when the EROS-CLINICAL was inconclusive; and (iii) EROS-COMPLETE, with basal and hormonal responses to stimulation tests, which was valuable for population-based screening, research purposes, and unusual presentations of OTS. Conclusion. We identified innovative tools with 100% accuracy for the diagnosis of OTS, without the need to exclude confounding disorders.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2020/3937819

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Athletes with overtraining syndrome have impaired cortisol regulation and metabolic imbalance, reflecting prolonged HPA hyperactivation.

    “Cadegiani and Kater (2019) observed impaired cortisol regulation and metabolic imbalance in athletes with overtraining syndrome (OTS), reflecting prolonged HPA hyperactivation [57].”

    From Chronic Stress and Autoimmunity: The Role of HPA Axis and Cortisol Dysregulation (2025) · cites this paper as [57]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) describes hormonal and metabolic dysfunction in OTS, and Results §3.1 (page unavailable) includes cortisol responses among the markers used to distinguish affected from healthy athletes. These passages support the broad description of metabolic imbalance and altered cortisol response, but they do not establish prolonged HPA hyperactivation as the explanation. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 1998, Overtraining in sport: terms, definitions, and prevalence

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Cadegiani, F. A., da Silva, P. H. L., Abrao, T. C. P., & Kater, C. E.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal de São Paulo (BR)
  • Adrenal and Hypertension Unit, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (EPM/UNIFESP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
Corresponding author
Cadegiani, Flavio Adsuara
Venue
Journal of Sports Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-04-22
Volume
2020
Pages
1-17
ISSN
  • 2314-6176 (ISSN-L)
  • 2356-7651
OpenAlex
W3018559107
Cited by
33
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3
FWCI
5.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Sports Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Universidade de São Paulo
  • Defence and Security Accelerator
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Exercise and Physiological Responses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
overtraining syndrome, diagnostic criteria, biomarkers, insulin tolerance test, endocrine response, clinical features, elite athletes, fatigue

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review