The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Machine Learning Approach to Predict Air Quality in California
Open accessAbstract
Predicting air quality is a complex task due to the dynamic nature, volatility, and high variability in time and space of pollutants and particulates. At the same time, being able to model, predict, and monitor air quality is becoming more and more relevant, especially in urban areas, due to the observed critical impact of air pollution on citizens’ health and the environment. In this paper, we employ a popular machine learning method, support vector regression (SVR), to forecast pollutant and particulate levels and to predict the air quality index (AQI). Among the various tested alternatives, radial basis function (RBF) was the type of kernel that allowed SVR to obtain the most accurate predictions. Using the whole set of available variables revealed a more successful strategy than selecting features using principal component analysis. The presented results demonstrate that SVR with RBF kernel allows us to accurately predict hourly pollutant concentrations, like carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, ground-level ozone, and particulate matter 2.5, as well as the hourly AQI for the state of California. Classification into six AQI categories defined by the US Environmental Protection Agency was performed with an accuracy of 94.1% on unseen validation data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cortes, C., & Vapnik, V. (1995) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00994018 · Cited by 59,421
Box, G. E. P., & Pierce, D. A. (1970) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1970.10481180 · Cited by 3,234
A new family of power transformations to improve normality or symmetry
Yeo, I.-K. (2000) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/87.4.954 · Cited by 1,702
Support Vector Machines for classification and regression
Brereton, R. G., & Lloyd, G. R. (2010) · The Analyst · doi:10.1039/b918972f · Cited by 1,036
Predicting time series with support vector machines
Müller, K. R., Smola, A. J., Rätsch, G., Schölkopf, B., Kohlmorgen, J., & Vapnik, V. (1997) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/bfb0020283 · Cited by 981
An analysis of four missing data treatment methods for supervised learning
Batista, G. E. A. P. A., & Monard, M. C. (2003) · Applied Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1080/713827181 · Cited by 895
Wang, W.-C., Chau, K.-W., Cheng, C.-T., & Qiu, L. (2009) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.06.019 · Cited by 824
Machine Learning Strategies for Time Series Forecasting
Bontempi, G., Ben Taieb, S., & Le Borgne, Y.-A. (2013) · Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-36318-4_3 · Cited by 531
Caiazzo, F., Ashok, A., Waitz, I. A., Yim, S. H. L., & Barrett, S. R. H. (2013) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.05.081 · Cited by 395
Financial Forecasting Using Support Vector Machines
Cao, L., & Tay, F. E. H. (2001) · Neural Computing & Applications · doi:10.1007/s005210170010 · Cited by 392
Cited by
IoT enabled environmental toxicology for air pollution monitoring using AI techniques
Asha, P., Natrayan, L., Geetha, B. T., Beulah, J. R., Sumathy, R., Varalakshmi, G., & Neelakandan, S. (2022) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2021.112574 · Cited by 303
Optimising Deep Learning at the Edge for Accurate Hourly Air Quality Prediction
Wardana, I. N. K., Gardner, J. W., & Fahmy, S. A. (2021) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s21041064 · Cited by 61
Metadata
- Authors
- Castelli, M., Clemente, F. M., Popovič, A., Silva, S., & Vanneschi, L.
- Venue
- Complexity
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-08-04
- Volume
- 2020
- Pages
- 1-23
- ISSN
- 1076-2787 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-0526
- OpenAlex
- W3046975334
- Cited by
- 298
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 12.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Machine Learning Approach to Predict Air Quality in California. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1155/2020/8049504
- The paper
- Castelli, M., Clemente, F. M., Popovič, A., Silva, S., & Vanneschi, L. (2020). A Machine Learning Approach to Predict Air Quality in California. Complexity. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8049504
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.