Application of artificial intelligence in emergency nursing of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Open accessAbstract
The research achievements of artificial intelligence technology in the development of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were explored, and the advantages and problems encountered in the development of intelligent nursing were analyzed. This paper presents the application of artificial intelligence in the emergency care of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The method included 447 COPD patients in a randomized controlled trial to observe the improvement of quality of life at 4 and 12 months after artificial intelligence medical intervention. A prospective randomized controlled trial included 101 patients with COPD who underwent a 9-month web-based knowledge exercise on the prevention of acute exacerbation of COPD through artificial intelligence medicine and were randomly divided into two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The results show that, in the experimental group and the control group, after 4 months, the quality of life does not change; after 12 months, compared with controls, the quality of life and emotional and psychological conditions have improved obviously. 29 patients who participated in the experiment and were randomly divided into the experimental group and the control group showed satisfactory results. COPD hospitalized rate and length of hospital stay were decreased in the experimental group than in the control group. For single-factor analysis, artificial intelligence medical intervention has not achieved significant significance, and the experimental results have preliminarily confirmed the effectiveness of artificial intelligence medical treatment.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
An RCT evaluating AI in emergency nursing for COPD patients failed to provide sufficient details on randomization procedures and generalizability, meeting only three MMAT criteria.
“Similarly, an RCT evaluating the application of AI in emergency nursing for COPD patients failed to provide sufficient details on randomization procedures and generalizability, meeting only three criteria (32).”
From Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts (2025) · cites this paper as [32]
The 18 included studies were rated as having a moderate risk of bias.
“Overall, the 18 studies were rated as having a moderate risk of bias (29–48).”
From Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts (2025) · cites this paper as [32]
Hong et al. (32) found that AI-driven telemedicine platforms facilitated real-time patient monitoring and early intervention, which reduced hospitalization rates and enhanced patients' quality of life.
“In emergency nursing for COPD patients, Hong et al. (32) found that AI-driven telemedicine platforms facilitated real-time patient monitoring and early intervention, which reduced hospitalization rates and enhanced patients’ quality of life.”
From Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts (2025) · cites this paper as [32]
Studies by Hong et al. and Rony et al. (32, 38) highlighted significant apprehensions regarding the extensive collection and use of personal health data by AI systems.
“Studies by Hong et al. and Rony et al. (32, 38) highlighted significant apprehensions regarding the extensive collection and use of personal health data by AI systems.”
From Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts (2025) · cites this paper as [32]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Emerging Artificial Intelligence Methods in Structural Engineering
Salehi, H., & Burgueño, R. (2018) · Engineering Structures · doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.05.084 · Cited by 1,068 · see citing works
Sundar, I. K., Li, D., & Rahman, I. (2019) · Journal of Extracellular Vesicles · doi:10.1080/20013078.2019.1684816 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Zhang, M., Tang, J., Yin, J., et al. (2018) · International Journal of COPD · doi:10.2147/copd.s152898 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Sundar, I. K., Li, D., & Rahman, I. (2019) · ACS Omega · doi:10.1021/acsomega.9b00966 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
The Role of Electronic Noses in Phenotyping Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Scarlata, S., Finamore, P., Mészáros, M., Dragonieri, S., & Bikov, A. (2020) · Biosensors · doi:10.3390/bios10110171 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Zhu, A., Teng, Y., Ge, D., Zhang, X., Hu, M., & Yao, X. (2019) · Journal of Thoracic Disease · doi:10.21037/jtd.2019.09.84 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Ferri, C. (2015) · High Blood Pressure & Cardiovascular Prevention · doi:10.1007/s40292-015-0078-3 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Davis, H., Glass, C., Davis, R., et al. (2020) · The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation · doi:10.1016/j.healun.2020.01.100 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Immunodeficiency in Patients with Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Xie, S., Wang, K., Zhang, Y., et al. (2018) · Inflammation · doi:10.1007/s10753-018-0830-7 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Barrett, N. A., Hart, N., & Camporota, L. (2019) · COPD Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease · doi:10.1080/15412555.2019.1681390 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
del Pozo, R. B. M., Alonso, M. R., & García, M. S. C. (2018) · Revista Iberoamericana de Micología · doi:10.1016/j.riam.2017.07.004 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Ayub, I., Arshad, A. M., Sekar, P., et al. (2018) · Lung India · doi:10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_198_17 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Кароли, Н. А., Бородкин, А. В., & Rebrov, A. P. (2019) · Kardiologiia · doi:10.18087/cardio.2486 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Sasaki, K., Kantarjian, H. M., Jabbour, E. J., et al. (2016) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood.v128.22.940.940 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Barriga, E. M., Pueyo, I., Sánchez, M. S., Martín‐Baranera, M., & Utset, J. M. (2017) · Emergencias · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Wu, C., Zhao, J., Wei, D. Y., et al. (2017) · PubMed · doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-0939.2017.02.002 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Li, Z. X., Zhang, J., Fong, N., & He, M. (2020) · PubMed · doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20200901-02526 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Lin, J. (2015) · PubMed · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Diagnosis of chronic heart failure in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Koliev, V. I., Sarapulova, I. E., & Ryabova, L. V. (2019) · Kazan medical journal · doi:10.17816/kmj2019-530 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Lee, J. (2020) · Korean Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.4166/kjg.2020.76.2.97 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [8]Li C. Han X. Wu D. H. Significance of artificial intelligence in healthcare for optimizing the emergency treatment process Fudan University Journal of Medical Sciences 2019 46 1 95 97
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Artificial intelligence in nursing: an integrative review of clinical and operational impacts
Hassanein, S., El Arab, R. A., Abdrbo, A., Abu-Mahfouz, M. S., Gaballah, M. K. F., Seweid, M. M., Almari, M., & Alzghoul, H. (2025) · Frontiers in Digital Health · doi:10.3389/fdgth.2025.1552372 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Martindale, A. P. L., Llewellyn, C. D., de Visser, R. O., Ng, B., Ngai, V., Kale, A. U., di Ruffano, L. F., Golub, R. M., Collins, G. S., Moher, D., et al. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-45355-3 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hong, L., Cheng, X., & Zheng, D.
- Affiliations
- Department of Emergency, The First People’s Hospital of Chun’an County, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 311700, China
- Department of Nursing, The First People’s Hospital of Chun’an County, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 311700, China
- Department of Infection, The First People’s Hospital of Chun’an County, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 311700, China
- Corresponding author
- Zheng, Deming
- Venue
- Contrast Media & Molecular Imaging
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2021-11-24
- Volume
- 2021
- Pages
- 1-6
- ISSN
- 1555-4309 (ISSN-L)
- 1555-4317
- PMC
- PMC8635944
- OpenAlex
- W3215106906
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 3.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Contrast Media & Molecular Imaging (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence, emergency nursing, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute exacerbation prevention, quality of life, hospitalization rates, length of hospital stay
- MeSH terms
- Artificial Intelligence, Humans, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life, Emergency Nursing, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review