Cited by 59Sepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentEmergency and Acute Care StudiesTrauma and Emergency Care Studies

Delayed Admission to the Intensive Care Unit and Mortality of Critically Ill Adults: Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis

Open access
Kiekkas, Panagiotis, Tzenalis, Anastasios, Gklava, Vasiliki, Stefanopoulos, Nikolaos, Voyagis, Gregorios, Aretha, Diamanto·2022·BioMed Research International

Abstract

Delayed admission of patients to the intensive care unit (ICU) is increasing worldwide and can be followed by adverse outcomes when critical care treatment is not provided timely. This systematic review and meta‐analysis appraised and synthesized the published literature about the association between delayed ICU admission and mortality of adult patients. Articles published from inception up to August 2021 in English‐language, peer‐reviewed journals indexed in CINAHL, PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched by using key terms. Delayed ICU admission constituted the intervention, while mortality for any predefined time period was the outcome. Risk for bias was evaluated with the Newcastle‐Ottawa Scale and additional criteria. Study findings were synthesized qualitatively, while the odds ratios (ORs) for mortality with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were combined quantitatively. Thirty‐four observational studies met inclusion criteria. Risk for bias was low in most studies. Unadjusted mortality was reported in 33 studies and was significantly higher in the delayed ICU admission group in 23 studies. Adjusted mortality was reported in 18 studies, and delayed ICU admission was independently associated with significantly higher mortality in 13 studies. Overall, pooled OR for mortality in case of delayed ICU admission was 1.61 (95% CI 1.44‐1.81). Interstudy heterogeneity was high ( I 2 = 66.96 % ). According to subgroup analysis, OR for mortality was remarkably higher in postoperative patients (OR, 2.44, 95% CI 1.49‐4.01). These findings indicate that delayed ICU admission is significantly associated with mortality of critically ill adults and highlight the importance of providing timely critical care in non‐ICU settings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2022/4083494

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Early ICU transfer is a window of critical opportunity for timely clinical interventions that alter the trajectory of a patient's clinical progression, prevent adverse outcomes and improve survival.

    “Early ICU transfer has been shown to be a ‘window of critical opportunity’ for timely clinical interventions that alter the trajectory of a patient’s clinical progression, prevent adverse outcomes and improve survival35–39.”

    From Real-time surveillance system for patient deterioration: a pragmatic cluster-randomized controlled trial (2025) · cites this paper as [35]

    The Results (section 3.6; page unavailable) report that delayed ICU admission was associated with higher mortality, supporting the survival-related part of the claim. But the paper does not show that early transfer itself enables interventions that change a patient’s trajectory or prevent adverse outcomes. The Discussion (section 4.3; page unavailable) says timely critical care should not depend on ICU admission. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 56 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kiekkas, P., Tzenalis, A., Gklava, V., Stefanopoulos, N., Voyagis, G., & Aretha, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Patras (GR)
  • General University Hospital of Patras (GR)
Venue
BioMed Research International
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-01
Volume
2022
Issue
1
Pages
4083494-4083494
ISSN
  • 1110-7243 (ISSN-L)
  • 2314-6133
  • 2314-6141
OpenAlex
W4210862364
Cited by
59
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 5
FWCI
1.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BioMed Research International (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
Keywords
delayed ICU admission, intensive care unit admission, mortality, critically ill adults, postoperative patients
MeSH terms
Adult, Humans, Intensive Care Units, Patient Admission, Time Factors, Critical Illness, Hospital Mortality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review