The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
PFP-LHCINCA: Pyramidal Fixed-Size Patch-Based Feature Extraction and Chi-Square Iterative Neighborhood Component Analysis for Automated Fetal Sex Classification on Ultrasound Images
Open accessAbstract
Objectives: Fetal sex determination with ultrasound (US) examination is indicated in pregnancies at risk of X-linked genetic disorders or ambiguous genitalia. However, misdiagnoses often arise due to operator inexperience and technical difficulties while acquiring diagnostic images. We aimed to develop an efficient automated US-based fetal sex classification model that can facilitate efficient screening and reduce misclassification. Methods: We have developed a novel feature engineering model termed PFP-LHCINCA that employs pyramidal fixed-size patch generation with average pooling-based image decomposition, handcrafted feature extraction based on local phase quantization (LPQ), and histogram of oriented gradients (HOG) to extract directional and textural features and used Chi-square iterative neighborhood component analysis feature selection (CINCA), which iteratively selects the most informative feature vector for each image that minimizes calculated feature parameter-derived k-nearest neighbor-based misclassification rates. The model was trained and tested on a sizeable expert-labeled dataset comprising 339 males' and 332 females' fetal US images. One transverse fetal US image per subject zoomed to the genital area and standardized to 256 × 256 size was used for analysis. Fetal sex was annotated by experts on US images and confirmed postnatally. Results: Standard model performance metrics were compared using five shallow classifiers-k-nearest neighbor (kNN), decision tree, naïve Bayes, linear discriminant, and support vector machine (SVM)-with the hyperparameters tuned using a Bayesian optimizer. The PFP-LHCINCA model achieved a sex classification accuracy of ≥88% with all five classifiers and the best accuracy rates (>98%) with kNN and SVM classifiers. Conclusions: US-based fetal sex classification is feasible and accurate using the presented PFP-LHCINCA model. The salutary results support its clinical use for fetal US image screening for sex classification. The model architecture can be modified into deep learning models for training larger datasets.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Kaplan et al. established an AI model for the automated classification of fetal sex in 2D US images of the genital area that helped reduce misclassification and facilitate screening.
“Lastly, an AI model for the automated classification of fetal sex in 2D US images of the genital area was established by Kaplan et al. that helped reduce misclassification and facilitate screening [182].”
From Evolving the Era of 5D Ultrasound? A Systematic Literature Review on the Applications for Artificial Intelligence Ultrasound Imaging in Obstetrics and Gynecology (2023) · cites this paper as [182]
The Materials and Methods section describes 2D ultrasound images of the fetal genital area, and the Conclusions report an automated sex-classification model with high accuracy. The Introduction proposes that automated classification could support screening and reduce misclassification, but the paper does not show that this model actually reduced misclassification or facilitated screening in clinical practice. Page numbers are not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 21 · Cited by 16
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- LiuH.andSetionoR. Chi2: feature selection and discretization of numeric attributes Proceedings of the 7th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence November 1995 Washington DC USA IEEE 388–391.
- NgA. Y.andJordanM. I. On discriminative vs. generative classifiers: a comparison of logistic regression and naive bayes Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems December 2002 Columbia Canada 841–848.
Metadata
- Authors
- Kaplan, E., Ekinci, T., Kaplan, S., Barua, P. D., Dogan, S., Tuncer, T., Tan, R.-S., Arunkumar, N., & Acharya, U. R.
- Affiliations
- Adıyaman Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR)
- Malatya Turgut Özal Üniversitesi (TR)
- University of Technology Sydney (AU)
- National University of Singapore (SG)
- Asia University (TW)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Contrast Media & Molecular Imaging
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2022-01
- Volume
- 2022
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 6034971-6034971
- ISSN
- 1555-4309 (ISSN-L)
- 1555-4317
- PMC
- PMC9132621
- OpenAlex
- W4280489747
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4
- FWCI
- 1.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Contrast Media & Molecular Imaging (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- OPUS - Open Publications of UTS Scholars (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Malatya Turgut Özal University Institutional Repository (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- DSpace - FIRAT (Fırat University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
- Keywords
- fetal ultrasound images, local phase quantization, histogram of oriented gradients, feature selection, handcrafted feature extraction, k-nearest neighbors, support vector machine, prenatal screening
- MeSH terms
- Bayes Theorem, Female, Humans, Male, Pregnancy, Ultrasonography, Support Vector Machine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review