Cited by 7IoT and Edge/Fog ComputingEnergy Efficiency in ComputingInternet of Things and AI

Mitigation Impact of Energy and Time Delay for Computation Offloading in an Industrial IoT Environment Using Levenshtein Distance Algorithm

Open access
Rafiq, Ahsan, Wang, Ping, Wei, Min, Ali Muthanna, Muhammad Saleh, Josbert, Nteziriza Nkerabahizi·2022·Security and Communication Networks

Abstract

Due to the explosive growth of the Internet of things (IoT) devices and the emergence of diverse new applications, network traffic volume is growing exponentially. The traditional centralized network architecture cannot fulfill IoT devices demand because of the heavy network traffic in industrial IoT. Moreover, IoT devices have limited computational ability and battery power. Energy consumption and time delay problems during computation offloading are fundamental issues. A new architecture known as mobile edge computing (MEC) was introduced to overcome these issues, which brings cloud services and its contents to the edge of the network. IoT devices can offload the data for computation to the cloud server or edge nodes. Different schemes have been proposed to overcome this problem under many scenarios (i.e., single-user, multiuser, and vehicular networks). In this paper, we proposed a modified delay mitigation Levenshtein distance algorithm (MDML). We consider an industrial scenario with multiple IoT devices and multiple servers (edge nodes). Each edge node consists of one MEC server. The proposed algorithm solves the offloading optimization problem of energy and mitigation of time delay with much lower complexity while significantly reducing offloading tasks’ execution time. It works on the basis of dynamic programming, where we break down a complex problem into subproblems. Performance evaluation of our proposed algorithm shows that it can achieve satisfactory energy efficiency and mitigate time delay in the industrial IoT environment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2022/6469380This paper is marked retracted.

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Boeing 787 Dreamliner experienced unexpected shutdowns due to a software glitch in its IIoT-enabled electrical system, resulting in performance issues.

    “An example of such challenges is the Boeing 787 Dreamliner, which experiencing unexpected shutdowns due to a software glitch in its IIoTenabled electrical system, resulting in performance issues [33].”

    From A Critical Overview of Industrial Internet of Things Security and Privacy Issues Using a Layer-Based Hacking Scenario (2023) · cites this paper as [33]

    The Introduction and Conclusion discuss industrial IoT, computation offloading, energy use, and delays, but do not address the Boeing 787 Dreamliner. Searches for the aircraft, unexpected shutdowns, a software glitch, and its electrical system found no relevant passage in our copy; the claimed incident cannot be verified from this source. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. A. Rafq, P. Wang, M. Wei, M. S. Ali Muthanna, and N. N. Josbert, "Mitigation Impact of Energy and Time Delay for Computation Ofoading in an Industrial IoT Environment Using Levenshtein Distance Algorithm," Security and Com- munication Networks, vol. 2022, Article ID 6469380, 12 pages, 2022.
  2. R. E. Bellman and S. E. Dreyfus, Applied dynamic program- ming, Princeton university press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 2015.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rafiq, A., Wang, P., Wei, M., Ali Muthanna, M. S., & Josbert, N. N.
Affiliations
  • Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications (CN)
  • Department of Computer Science, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunication, Chongqing 400065, China
Corresponding author
Wei, Min
Venue
Security and Communication Networks
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-02-12
Volume
2022
Pages
1-12
ISSN
  • 1939-0114 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0122
OpenAlex
W4213158588
Cited by
7
References
37
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Status
Retracted
Open access
Locations
  • Security and Communication Networks (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Basic Research Program of China (2020YFB1708800, cstc2021ycjh-bgzxm0206)
  • Chongqing Talent Plan Project (2020YFB1708800, cstc2021ycjh-bgzxm0206)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Energy Efficiency in Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Internet of Things and AI
Keywords
computation offloading, Industrial Internet of Things, mobile edge computing, energy efficiency, dynamic programming, edge nodes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review