Cited by 70Sentiment Analysis and Opinion MiningMisinformation and Its ImpactsHate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ensemble Classifiers for Arabic Sentiment Analysis of Social Network (Twitter Data) towards COVID-19-Related Conspiracy Theories

Open access
Al-Hashedi, Abdullah, Al-Fuhaidi, Belal, Mohsen, Abdulqader M., Ali, Yousef, Gamal Al-Kaf, Hasan Ali, Al-Sorori, Wedad, Maqtary, Naseebah·2022·Applied Computational Intelligence and Soft Computing

Abstract

Sentiment analysis has recently become increasingly important with a massive increase in online content. It is associated with the analysis of textual data generated by social media that can be easily accessed, obtained, and analyzed. With the emergence of COVID-19, most published studies related to COVID-19’s conspiracy theories were surveys on the people's sentiments and opinions and studied the impact of the pandemic on their lives. Just a few studies utilized sentiment analysis of social media using a machine learning approach. These studies focused more on sentiment analysis of Twitter tweets in the English language and did not pay more attention to other languages such as Arabic. This study proposes a machine learning model to analyze the Arabic tweets from Twitter. In this model, we apply Word2Vec for word embedding which formed the main source of features. Two pretrained continuous bag-of-words (CBOW) models are investigated, and Naïve Bayes was used as a baseline classifier. Several single-based and ensemble-based machine learning classifiers have been used with and without SMOTE (synthetic minority oversampling technique). The experimental results show that applying word embedding with an ensemble and SMOTE achieved good improvement on average of F1 score compared to the baseline classifier and other classifiers (single-based and ensemble-based) without SMOTE.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2022/6614730

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. S. Shahsavari, 2020, Conspiracy in the time of corona: automatic detection of covid-19 conspiracy theories in social media and the news, 10.1007/s42001-020-00086-5 · DOI
  2. 10.7759/cureus.7255 · DOI
  3. 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00009 · DOI
  4. J. Waterson, How false claims about 5G health risks spread into the mainstream, The Guardian
  5. 10.1561/1500000011 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1016/j.knosys.2020.105949 · DOI
  7. 10.5455/JPMA.38 · DOI
  8. 10.34297/AJBSR.2020.08.001252 · DOI
  9. 10.1177/18344909211037385 · DOI
  10. 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.565128 · DOI
  11. 10.21203/rs.3.rs-33972/v1 · DOI
  12. 10.21203/rs.3.rs-33972/v1 · DOI
  13. M. Alhajji, 2020, Sentiment analysis of tweets in Saudi Arabia regarding governmental preventive measures to contain COVID-19, 10.20944/preprints202004.0031.v1 · DOI
  14. K. Suppala, 2019, Sentiment analysis using naive Bayes classifier, International Journal of nInnovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, 8, 265
  15. 10.2196/19458 · DOI
  16. 10.17583/rimcis.2020.5386 · DOI
  17. 10.1109/eSmarTA52612.2021.9515749 · DOI
  18. 10.1109/ITSS-IoE53029.2021.9615256 · DOI
  19. 10.1155/2020/7403128 · DOI
  20. 10.3115/v1/d14-1162 · DOI · Paper page
  21. G. Vinodhini, 2012, Sentiment analysis and opinion mining: a survey, International Journal, 2, 282
  22. 10.1504/ijbdi.2014.063845 · DOI
  23. 10.1109/iacs.2014.6841964 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/s1532-0464(03)00034-0 · DOI · Paper page
  25. M. Swamynathan, 2019, Mastering Machine Learning with Python in Six Steps: A Practical Implementation Guide to Predictive Data Analytics Using Python, 10.1007/978-1-4842-4947-5 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.eswa.2016.03.045 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1177/0165551515613226 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 70

Metadata

Authors
Al-Hashedi, A., Al-Fuhaidi, B., Mohsen, A. M., Ali, Y., Gamal Al-Kaf, H. A., Al-Sorori, W., & Maqtary, N.
Affiliations
  • University of Science and Technology, Sana’a (YE)
  • Faculty of Computing and IT, University of Science and Technology Sana’a, Sana’a, Yemen
Corresponding author
Al-Fuhaidi, Belal
Venue
Applied Computational Intelligence and Soft Computing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-01-13
Volume
2022
Pages
1-10
ISSN
  • 1687-9724 (ISSN-L)
  • 1687-9732
OpenAlex
W4206646040
Cited by
70
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 12
FWCI
4.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Computational Intelligence and Soft Computing (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • University of Science and Technology Institutional Repository (University of Science and Technology, Sana’a, Yemen) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Greater South Information System
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
Keywords
Arabic sentiment analysis, COVID-19 conspiracy theories, Twitter, ensemble classifiers, Word2Vec, SMOTE, class imbalance, social media text, naive Bayes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review