Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 5

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Research on the Evaluation of Ecotourism Resources: Based on the AHP Model

Ren, Lei, Lei, Wen·2022·Mathematical Problems in Engineering

Abstract

The comprehensive evaluation of ecotourism resources in the Qinling Mountains scenic spot using the AHP method can provide a reference for the sustainable construction and development of ecotourism resources, as well as the development of other tourism areas. Based on the analytic hierarchy process, the evaluation system of Qinling Mountain Ecotourism Resources is constructed, and the construction system is used to evaluate tourism ecological resources. The results show that, among the subtarget levels, the highest score is the interaction of tourism areas in the same region and the second is the applicability of regulations. These two indicators have a high impact on the score of Qinling Mountain Ecotourism Resources. In the project layer, the source of passenger flow has the largest weight, which is 0.1717, and the distribution of resource types has a smaller weight. At the index level, participation needs to be considered for tourism participation design. The Qinling scenic area has high historical and cultural value, diverse resource types, good tourist source market conditions, and great tourism development potential. However, problems exist, such as low resource aggregation and imperfect tourism supporting facilities development. It is necessary to develop ecotourism resources on the premise of ensuring environmental quality while taking into account the in-depth excavation of the experience and ornamental values of tourism resources, establishing the tourism characteristics of scenic spots from many aspects, such as improving tourism participation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2022/7398537

Cites

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Natural scenery of Qinling Mountains.
Figure 1 Natural scenery of Qinling Mountains.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 2 Geographical location of Qinling Mountains.
Figure 2 Geographical location of Qinling Mountains.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 3 Taibai Mountain.
Figure 3 Taibai Mountain.CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 4
CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 4 Rare animals in Qinling Mountains: (a) panda and (b) golden monkey.
Figure 4 Rare animals in Qinling Mountains: (a) panda and (b) golden monkey.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 5 Structure of the analytic hierarchy process.
Figure 5 Structure of the analytic hierarchy process.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 6 Evaluation index system of tourism resources in the Qinling Mountains.
Figure 6 Evaluation index system of tourism resources in the Qinling Mountains.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 7 Scenic spots after development and investment: (a) Gengyu and (b) Tianyu.
Figure 7 Scenic spots after development and investment: (a) Gengyu and (b) Tianyu.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 8 Qinling featured products: (a) kiwifruit and (b) cole flowers.
Figure 8 Qinling featured products: (a) kiwifruit and (b) cole flowers.CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 10
CC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. X. Chen, 2020, Study on the rural ecotourism resource evaluation system, Environmental Technology & Innovation, 20
  2. 10.1177/1550147719895953 · DOI
  3. 10.1007/s13157-020-01274-9 · DOI
  4. 10.3390/su6106781 · DOI
  5. 10.1007/s12145-021-00611-8 · DOI
  6. A. Smriti, 2019, Evaluating the applicability of ESM (Ecotourism Sustainability Maximization) model to assess, monitor, and manage the ecotourism sustainability in mountain ecosystem (Mt. Kangchendzonga Base Camp Trek, India), Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 191, 1
  7. 10.1016/j.cosust.2018.04.004 · DOI
  8. 10.2112/09-1181.1 · DOI
  9. W. Wu, 2015, Comprehensive evaluation of cloud manufacturing service based on fuzzy theory ecotourism suitability and zoning from the tourist perspective: a nature reserve case study, Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 24, 2683, 10.15244/pjoes/59422 · DOI
  10. 10.1007/s40815-021-01071-4 · DOI
  11. 10.1155/2022/9047644 · DOI
  12. 10.1007/s10668-021-01528-4 · DOI
  13. S. A. Jozi, 2010, Presentation of strategic management plan in ecotourism development through SWOT: case study of Qeshm Island, Journal of Food Agriculture and Environment, 8, 1123
  14. 10.1007/s10668-020-00964-y · DOI
  15. S. Gass, 2005, Model world: the great debate - MAUT versus AHP journal, Interfaces, 35, 308, 10.1287/inte.1050.0152 · DOI
  16. 10.1007/s13762-020-02633-z · DOI
  17. 10.1007/s41324-020-00316-y · DOI
  18. M. Salemi, 2019, Conceptual framework for evaluation of ecotourism carrying capacity for sustainable development of Karkheh protected area, Iran, The International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 26, 1, 10.1080/13504509.2019.1570379 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.tmp.2018.09.007 · DOI
  20. 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00703.x · DOI
  21. 10.1155/2022/7106926 · DOI
  22. M. Kolahi, 2014, From paper parks to real conservations: case study of social capital in Iran’s biodiversity conservation, International Journal of Environmental Research, 8, 101
  23. 10.3390/su7044727 · DOI
  24. 10.3390/w14162486 · DOI
  25. S. Wearing, 2019, Exploring tripartite praxis for the REDD + forest climate change initiative through community based ecotourism, Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 28, 1
  26. F. Monti, 2018, The price of success: integrative long-term study reveals ecotourism impacts on a flagship species at a UNESCO site, Animal Conservation, 21, 10.1111/acv.12407 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.04.036 · DOI
  28. M. Erfani, 2015, Tourism positioning using decision support system (case study: chahnime-Zabol, Iran), Environmental Earth Sciences, 74, 3135, 10.1007/s12665-015-4365-z · DOI
  29. 10.1080/13504509.2011.556816 · DOI
  30. T. P. L. Nguyen, 2020, Promoting participation in local natural resource management through ecological cultural tourism: case study in vam nao reservoir area, an giang province, vietnam, Journal of Asian and African Studies, 55, 863, 10.1177/0021909620935426 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Ren, L., & Lei, W.
Affiliations
  • Polus International College, Sichuan, Chengdu 610103, China
  • Sichuan Conservatory of Music, Sichuan, Chengdu 610021, China
Venue
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-10-06
Volume
2022
Pages
1-10
ISSN
  • 1563-5147
  • 1024-123X
Cited by
5
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.