Cited by 13Medical Image Segmentation TechniquesChronic Kidney Disease and DiabetesArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

Evaluation of functional magnetic resonance imaging under artificial intelligence algorithm on plan-do-check-action home nursing for patients with diabetic nephropathy

Open access
Du, Qianqian, Liang, Dianchao, Zhang, Lixin, Chen, Guoyan, Li, Xueyan·2022·Contrast Media & Molecular Imaging

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) under the fuzzy C‐means (FCM) clustering algorithm on plan‐do‐check‐action (PDCA) home nursing for patients with diabetic nephropathy (DN). As the characteristics of fMRI image data were combined, the FCM algorithm was improved and applied into the clustering processing of fMRI activation regions of patients. 64 patients with DN were chosen as the research objects and were divided into the research group with PDCA home nursing and the control group with routine home nursing. The patients were randomly divided into the research group (n = 32) and the control group (n = 32). The curative effect, nursing satisfaction, and quality of life of patients after nursing were compared. The results showed that the coverage of fMRI activation points was significantly higher as being detected by the FCM algorithm, and the running time was shortened by 33.6 min. After nursing, the total effective rates in the research group and the control group were 87.5% vs. 34.4% in 3 months, 93.8% vs. 68.8% in 6 months, and 96.9% vs. 75.0% in 12 months, respectively; those in the research group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P < 0.05). The nursing satisfaction score (91.3 ± 4.5 vs. 80.9 ± 5.2) and nursing service quality score (89.7 ± 6.6 vs. 80.3 ± 7.1) in the research group were also significantly higher than those in the control group (P < 0.05). Meanwhile, the scores of each item after nursing in the research group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P < 0.05). The improved FCM algorithm detected the activation regions in the fMRI images more effectively, which could provide help for diagnosis and reduce error and misdiagnosis. At the same time, the PDCA home nursing also offered great help to the recovery of patients with DN, which was more superior for the curative effect of hospitalization, the promotion of recovery, and the improvement of patients’ quality of life.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2022/9882532

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Du et al. (41) implemented an AI-based Plan-Do-Check-Action (PDCA) home nursing model for patients with diabetic nephropathy, which led to significant improvements in clinical effectiveness and patient satisfaction over 12 months.

    “Du et al. (41) implemented an AI-based Plan-Do-Check-Action (PDCA) home nursing model for patients with diabetic nephropathy, which led to significant improvements in clinical effectiveness and patient satisfaction over 12 months by enabling dynamic adjustments to care plans based on AI-generated insights.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [15]Varghese R. T. Jialal I. Doerr C. Diabetic nephropathy (nursing) StatPearls [Internet] 2021 Treasure Island, FL, USA StatPearls Publishing 33760450

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Du, Q., Liang, D., Zhang, L., Chen, G., & Li, X.
Corresponding author
Du, Qianqian
Venue
Contrast Media & Molecular Imaging
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-01
Volume
2022
Issue
1
Pages
9882532-9882532
ISSN
  • 1555-4309 (ISSN-L)
  • 1555-4317
OpenAlex
W4220761207
Cited by
13
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Contrast Media & Molecular Imaging (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Hebei Youth Science and technology project (20160768)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
diabetic nephropathy, home care nursing, Plan-Do-Check-Act cycle, fuzzy c-means clustering, functional MRI, nursing satisfaction, quality of life, nursing service quality
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetic Nephropathies, Home Nursing, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Quality of Life

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review