Cited by 8Machine Learning in HealthcareEmergency and Acute Care StudiesArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

Machine Learning-Based Models for Prediction of Critical Illness at Community, Paramedic, and Hospital Stages

Open access
Lee, Sijin, Park, Hyun Ji, Hwang, Jumi, Lee, Sung Woo, Han, Kap Su, Kim, Won Young, Jeong, Jinwoo, Kang, Hyunggoo +3 more·2023·Emergency Medicine International

Abstract

Overcrowding of emergency department (ED) has put a strain on national healthcare systems and adversely affected the clinical outcomes of critically ill patients. Early identification of critically ill patients prior to ED visits can help induce optimal patient flow and allocate medical resources effectively. This study aims to develop ML-based models for predicting critical illness in the community, paramedic, and hospital stages using Korean National Emergency Department Information System (NEDIS) data. Random forest and light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM) were applied to develop predictive models. The predictive model performance based on AUROC in community stage, paramedic stage, and hospital stage was estimated to be 0.870 (95% CI: 0.869–0.871), 0.897 (95% CI: 0.896–0.898), and 0.950 (95% CI: 0.949–0.950) in random forest and 0.877 (95% CI: 0.876–0.878), 0.899 (95% CI: 0.898–0.900), and 0.950 (95% CI: 0.950–0.951) in LightGBM, respectively. The ML models showed high performance in predicting critical illness using variables available at each stage, which can be helpful in guiding patients to appropriate hospitals according to their severity of illness. Furthermore, a simulation model can be developed for proper allocation of limited medical resources.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2023/1221704

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, S., Park, H. J., Hwang, J., Lee, S. W., Han, K. S., Kim, W. Y., Jeong, J., Kang, H., Kim, A., Lee, C., & Kim, S. J.
Affiliations
  • Korea University (KR)
  • Asan Medical Center (KR)
  • Dong-A University (KR)
  • Hanyang University (KR)
Corresponding author
  • Lee, Chulung
  • Kim, Su Jin
Venue
Emergency Medicine International
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-06-26
Volume
2023
Pages
1-11
ISSN
  • 2090-2840 (ISSN-L)
  • 2090-2859
OpenAlex
W4382045580
Cited by
8
References
44
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2
FWCI
0.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Emergency Medicine International (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Korean Association of Regional Emergency Medical Centers (K1913901, K1915031, K2011351, K2012711)
  • Korean Society of Emergency Medicine (K1913901, K1915031, K2011351, K2012711)
  • Korea University (K1913901, K1915031, K2011351, K2012711)
  • Brain Korea 21 FOUR (K1913901, K1915031, K2011351, K2012711)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
critical illness prediction, emergency department overcrowding, prehospital care, paramedics, patient flow, resource allocation, random forest, LightGBM, emergency department utilization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review