Generative AI in Marketing: Foundations, Trends, and Future Research Propositions
Open accessAbstract
This study intends to conduct a bibliometric analysis of the literature on generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in marketing. Moreover, it expounds the research foundations and emerging patterns associated with GenAI in marketing and formulates prospective research propositions. This study utilizes bibliometric analysis and a literature review to evaluate the scholarly contributions of publications, authors with the highest productivity, publications with significant impact, institutions, and nations. Three hundred and seventy‐one Scopus and Web of Science database documents were retrieved and consolidated by eliminating duplicates. The analysis employed various techniques, including coword analysis, thematic representation, cocitations, coupling by clustering, and international collaborations. The research uses the Bibliometrix R package to merge the dataset and conduct the bibliometric analysis. The last 2 years, 2023 and 2024, stand out as the most productive years with a notable quantity of publications, reaching 107 in 2023 and 71 in 2024. The most influential papers revolve around advertising content, sentiment analysis, and text mining. The institution with the most influence in this field is the University of Colorado Boulder, and the country is the United States. Bibliographic coupling analysis proposed the presence of four thematic clusters: opinion and text mining, big data analytics, artificial intelligence in marketing, and user‐generated content. The investigation is an enlightening resource for scholars researching GenAI within the marketing domain. It will benefit researchers to familiarize themselves with previous studies and current research in this field. It also offers valuable information on this area’s most promising articles, journals, and authors. Furthermore, it provides valuable insights into potential avenues for future investigations in this domain. Consequently, the findings of this study will be advantageous for aspiring scholars in this field to establish the direction of their research endeavors. This study primarily examines performance and an academic representation of GenAI’s role in marketing. It serves as the initial study to present GenAI’s current research positions and future directions in marketing through bibliometric analysis.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Marketing scholarship has examined Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) primarily through firm-side strategy.
“Marketing scholarship has examined Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) primarily through firm-side strategy(Prasanna and Kushwaha, 2025;Riandhi et al., 2025;Grewal et al., 2025;Kumar et al., 2026)”
From Shopping by algorithm: How agentic AI deploys human heuristics as a surrogate consumer (2026) · cites this paper as Prasanna and Kushwaha, 2025
The Background describes GenAI’s use in firms’ marketing strategies, supporting the firm-side aspect. But the Introduction characterizes previous research as primarily focused on technical advancements and applications, and the Conclusion lists themes including text mining, speech recognition, and user-generated content. The paper does not establish that marketing scholarship has examined GenAI primarily through firm-side strategy. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Students' voices on generative ai: perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education
Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.00290 · Cited by 2,504 · see citing works
Students’ voices on generative AI: perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education
Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8 · Cited by 2,301 · see citing works
Advertising Content and Consumer Engagement on Social Media: Evidence from Facebook
Lee, D., Hosanagar, K., & Nair, H. S. (2018) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2017.2902 · Cited by 1,069 · see citing works
Budhwar, P., Chowdhury, S., Wood, G., Aguinis, H., Bamber, G. J., Beltran, J. R., Boselie, P., Lee Cooke, F., Decker, S., DeNisi, A., et al. (2023) · Human Resource Management Journal · doi:10.1111/1748-8583.12524 · Cited by 908 · see citing works
Uniting the Tribes: Using Text for Marketing Insight
Berger, J., Humphreys, A., Ludwig, S., Moe, W. W., Netzer, O., & Schweidel, D. A. (2020) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/0022242919873106 · Cited by 742 · see citing works
Wach, K., Duong, C. D., Ejdys, J., Kazlauskaitė, R., Korzynski, P., Mazurek, G., Paliszkiewicz, J., & Ziemba, E. (2023) · Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review · doi:10.15678/eber.2023.110201 · Cited by 584 · see citing works
Identifying Customer Needs from User-Generated Content
Timoshenko, A., & Hauser, J. R. (2019) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.2018.1123 · Cited by 513 · see citing works
Paschen, J., Wilson, M., & Ferreira, J. J. (2020) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2020.01.003 · Cited by 410 · see citing works
Rizvi, S. K. J., Azad, M. A., & Fraz, M. M. (2021) · Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering · doi:10.1007/s11831-021-09543-4 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 77
- P. Korzynski, G. Mazurek, A. Altmann, et al., "Generative Artificial Intelligence as a New Context for Management The- ories: Analysis of ChatGPT," Central European Management Journal 31, no. 1 (2023): 3-13, https://doi.org/10.1108/cemj- 02-2023-0091. · DOI
- V. Kumar, P. Kotler, S. Gupta, and B. Rajan, "Generative AI in Marketing: Promises, Perils, and Public Policy Implications," Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 44, no. 3 (2025): 309- 331, https://doi.org/10.1177/07439156241286499. · DOI
- S. Mondal, S. Das, and V. G. Vrana, "How to Bell the Cat? A Theoretical Review of Generative Artificial Intelligence Towards Digital Disruption in All Walks of Life," Technologies 11, no. 2 (2023): 44, https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies11020044. · DOI
- N. Kshetri, Y. K. Dwivedi, T. H. Davenport, and N. Panteli, "Generative Artificial Intelligence in Marketing: Applications, Opportunities, Challenges, and Research Agenda," Interna- tional Journal of Information Management 75 (2024): 102716, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102716. · DOI
- R. Peres, M. Schreier, D. Schweidel, and A. Sorescu, "On ChatGPT and Beyond: How Generative Artificial Intelligence May Affect Research, Teaching, and Practice," International Journal of Research in Marketing 40, no. 2 (2023): 269-275, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2023.03.001. · DOI · Paper page
- J. W. Goodell, S. Kumar, W. M. Lim, and D. Pattnaik, "Artifi- cial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Finance: Identifying Foundations, Themes, and Research Clusters From Bibliomet- ric Analysis," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance 32 (2021): 100577, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2021.100577. · DOI
- Y. Li and Y. Xie, "Is a Picture Worth a Thousand Words? An Empirical Study of Image Content and Social Media Engage- ment," Journal of Marketing Research 57, no. 1 (2020): 1-19, https://doi.org/10.1177/0022243719881113. · DOI
- S. Dipaola, L. Gabora, and G. McCaig, "Informing Artificial Intelligence Generative Techniques Using Cognitive Theories of Human Creativity," Procedia Computer Science 145 (2018): 158-168, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.11.024. · DOI
- D. E. Matytsin, V. A. Dzedik, G. A. Makeeva, and S. B. Boldyreva, ""Smart" Outsourcing in Support of the Humanization of Entre- preneurship in the Artificial Intelligence Economy," Communi- cations 10, no. 1 (2023): https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022- 01493-x. · DOI
- T. Dogru, N. Line, M. Mody, et al., "Generative Artificial Intel- ligence in the Hospitality and Tourism Industry: Developing a Framework for Future Research," Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research 49, no. 2 (2025): 235-253, https://doi.org/ 10.1177/10963480231188663. · DOI
- M. H. Huang and R. T. Rust, "The Caring Machine: Feeling AI for Customer Care," Journal of Marketing 88, no. 5 (2024): 1-23, https://doi.org/10.1177/00222429231224748. · DOI
- V. Ratten and P. Jones, "Generative Artificial Intelligence (ChatGPT): Implications for Management Educators," Inter- national Journal of Management Education 21, no. 3 (2023): 100857, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100857. · DOI
- J. Ford, V. Jain, K. Wadhwani, and D. G. Gupta, "AI Advertising: An Overview and Guidelines," Journal of Business Research 166 (2023): 114124, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114124. · DOI · Paper page
- T. Karakose, M. Demirkol, R. Yirci, H. Polat, T. Y. Ozdemir, and T. Tülübaş, "A Conversation With ChatGPT About Digi- tal Leadership and Technology Integration: Comparative Analysis Based on Human-AI Collaboration," Administrative Sciences 13, no. 7 (2023): 157, https://doi.org/10.3390/ admsci13070157. · DOI
- R. Dwivedi, S. Nerur, and V. Balijepally, "Exploring Artificial Intelligence and Big Data Scholarship in Information Systems: A Citation, Bibliographic Coupling, and Co-Word Analysis," International Journal of Information Management Data Insights 3, no. 2 (2023): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei. 2023.100185. · DOI
- H. O. Zaki, D. Fernandez, O. Dastane, A. Aman, and S. Sanusi, "Virtual Reality in Digital Marketing: Research Agenda Based on Bibliometric Reflection," Marketing Intelligence & Planning 41, no. 4 (2023): 505-524, https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-12- 2022-0568. · DOI
- G. Bilquise, S. Ibrahim, and K. Shaalan, "Emotionally Intelli- gent Chatbots: A Systematic Literature Review," Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies 2022 (2022): 23, 9601630, https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9601630. · DOI
- L. Theodorakopoulos and A. Theodoropoulou, "Leveraging Big Data Analytics for Understanding Consumer Behavior in Digital Marketing: A Systematic Review," Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies 2024, no. 1 (2024): 3641502, https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/3641502. · DOI · Paper page
- N. Zierau, C. Hildebrand, A. Bergner, F. Busquet, A. Schmitt, and J. Marco Leimeister, "Voice Bots on the Frontline: Voice-Based Interfaces Enhance Flow-Like Consumer Experi- ences & Boost Service Outcomes," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 51, no. 4 (2023): 823-842, https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s11747-022-00868-5. · DOI
- Y. Zhang, I. W. Tsang, and L. Duan, "Collaborative Generative Hashing for Marketing and Fast Cold-Start Recommendation," IEEE Intelligent Systems 35, no. 5 (2020): 84-95, https://doi.org/ 10.1109/MIS.2020.3025197. · DOI
- S. Flaig and G. Junike, "Scenario Generation for Market Risk Models Using Generative Neural Networks," Risks 10, no. 11 (2022): 199, https://doi.org/10.3390/risks10110199. · DOI
- T. Lancaster, "Artificial Intelligence, Text Generation Tools and ChatGPT -Does Digital Watermarking Offer a Solu- tion?," International Journal for Educational Integrity 19, no. 1 (2023): https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-023-00131-6. · DOI · Paper page
- Y. K. Dwivedi, N. Kshetri, L. Hughes, et al., "Opinion Paper:"So What If ChatGPT Wrote It?" Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Opportunities, Challenges and Implications of Generative Con- versational AI for Research, Practice and Policy," International Journal of Information Management 71 (2023): 102642, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642. · DOI · Paper page
- M. M. Mariani, N. Hashemi, and J. Wirtz, "Artificial Intelligence Empowered Conversational Agents: A Systematic Literature Review and Research Agenda," Journal of Business Research 161 (2023): 113838, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113838. · DOI
- P. Li, N. Castelo, Z. Katona, and M. Sarvary, "Frontiers: Deter- mining the Validity of Large Language Models for Automated Perceptual Analysis," Marketing Science 43, no. 2 (2024): 254- 266, https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2023.0454. · DOI
- S. Kraus, P. Jones, N. Kailer, A. Weinmann, N. Chaparro- Banegas, and N. Roig-Tierno, "Digital Transformation: An Overview of the Current State of the Art of Research," SAGE Open 11, no. 3 (2021): https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211 047576. · DOI
- N. Donthu, S. Kumar, D. Mukherjee, N. Pandey, and W. M. Lim, "How to Conduct a Bibliometric Analysis: An Overview and Guidelines," Journal of Business Research 133 (2021): 285-296, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070. · DOI · Paper page
- É. Archambault, D. Campbell, Y. Gingras, and V. Larivière, "Comparing Bibliometric Statistics Obtained From the Web of Science and Scopus," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60, no. 7 (2009): 1320- 1326, https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21062. · DOI · Paper page
- P. Mongeon and A. Paul-Hus, "The Journal Coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A Comparative Analysis," Scientomet- rics 106, no. 1 (2016): 213-228, https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11192-015-1765-5. · DOI · Paper page
- J. Vom Brocke, A. Simons, K. Riemer, B. Niehaves, R. Plattfaut, and A. Cleven, "Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: Chal- lenges and Recommendations of Literature Search in Informa- tion Systems Research," Communications of the Association for Information Systems 37, no. 1 (2015): 9, https://doi.org/ 10.17705/1CAIS.03709. · DOI
- J. Webster and R. T. Watson, Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review (MIS Quarterly, 2002).
- D. Moher, A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, and D. G. Altman, "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement," BMJ 339 (2009): 1-8, https:// doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535. · DOI · Paper page
- A. Liberati, D. G. Altman, J. Tetzlaff, et al., "The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta- Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Healthcare Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration," BMJ 339 (2009): b2700, https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2700. · DOI · Paper page
- S. Ahmed, M. M. Alshater, A. E. Ammari, and H. Hammami, "Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Finance: A Bibliometric Review," Research in International Business and Finance 61 (2022): 101646, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf. 2022.101646. · DOI
- U. Shahzad, M. Gupta, G. D. Sharma, A. Rao, and R. Chopra, "Resolving Energy Poverty for Social Change: Research Direc- tions and Agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change 181 (2022): 121777, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tech- fore.2022.121777. · DOI
- W. Biemans, A. Malshe, and J. S. Johnson, "The Sales- Marketing Interface: A Systematic Literature Review and Directions for Future Research," Industrial Marketing Man- agement 102 (2022): 324-337, https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.indmarman.2022.02.001. · DOI
- M. Egger, G. D. Smith, and A. N. Phillips, "Meta-Analysis: Principles and Procedures," BMJ 315, no. 7121 (1997): 1533- 1537.
- R. N. Broadus, "Toward a Definition of "Bibliometrics"," Sci- entometrics 12, no. 5-6 (1987): 373-379, https://doi.org/ 10.1007/BF02016680. · DOI
- M. Srivastava, "Mapping the Influence of Influencer Market- ing: A Bibliometric Analysis," Marketing Intelligence and Plan- ning 39, no. 7 (2021): 979-1003, https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP- 03-2021-0085. · DOI
- M. Sigala, S. Kumar, N. Donthu, R. Sureka, and Y. Joshi, "A Bibliometric Overview of the Journal of Hospitality and Tour- ism Management: Research Contributions and Influence," Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management 47 (2021): 273-288, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2021.04.005. · DOI · Paper page
- H. Kent Baker, N. Pandey, S. Kumar, and A. Haldar, "A Biblio- metric Analysis of Board Diversity: Current Status, Develop- ment, and Future Research Directions," Journal of Business Research 108 (2020): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019. 11.025. · DOI
- J. Atle and G. Gmd, "A General Explanation Component for Conceptual Modeling in CASE Environments," ACM Trans- actions on Information Systems (TOIS) 14, no. 3 (1996): 297- 329.
- K. Ravi and V. Ravi, "A Survey on Opinion Mining and Senti- ment Analysis: Tasks, Approaches and Applications," Knowl- edge-Based Systems 89 (2015): 14-46, https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.knosys.2015.06.015. · DOI
- X. Liu, H. Shin, and A. C. Burns, "Examining the Impact of Luxury Brand's Social Media Marketing on Customer Engage- ment: Using Big Data Analytics and Natural Language Pro- cessing," Journal of Business Research 125 (2021): 815-826, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.04.042. 15 Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies · DOI
- R. Decker and M. Trusov, "Estimating Aggregate Consumer Preferences From Online Product Reviews," International Journal of Research in Marketing 27, no. 4 (2010): 293-307, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2010.09.001. · DOI
- J. Hartmann, J. Huppertz, C. Schamp, and M. Heitmann, "Comparing Automated Text Classification Methods," Inter- national Journal of Research in Marketing 36, no. 1 (2019): 20-38, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2018.09.009. · DOI · Paper page
- S. Poria, E. Cambria, G. Winterstein, and G. B. Huang, "Sentic Patterns: Dependency-Based Rules for Concept-Level Senti- ment Analysis," Knowledge-Based Systems 69, no. 1 (2014): 45-63, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2014.05.005. · DOI
- J. R. Ragini, P. M. R. Anand, and V. Bhaskar, "Big Data Ana- lytics for Disaster Response and Recovery Through Sentiment Analysis," International Journal of Information Management 42 (2018): 13-24, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018. 05.004. · DOI
- O. Müller, I. Junglas, J. V. Brocke, and S. Debortoli, "Utilizing Big Data Analytics for Information Systems Research: Chal- lenges, Promises and Guidelines," European Journal of Infor- mation Systems 25, no. 4 (2016): 289-302, https://doi.org/ 10.1057/ejis.2016.2. · DOI
- S. M. Rezaeinia, R. Rahmani, A. Ghodsi, and H. Veisi, "Senti- ment Analysis Based on Improved Pre-Trained Word Embed- dings," Expert Systems with Applications 117 (2019): 139-147, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.08.044. · DOI
- Y. C. Chang, C. H. Ku, and C. H. Chen, "Social Media Analyt- ics: Extracting and Visualizing Hilton Hotel Ratings and Reviews From TripAdvisor," International Journal of Informa- tion Management 48 (2019): 263-279, https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.ijinfomgt.2017.11.001. · DOI
- J. Jin, Y. Liu, P. Ji, and H. Liu, "Understanding Big Consumer Opinion Data for Market-Driven Product Design," Interna- tional Journal of Production Research 54, no. 10 (2016): 3019-3041, https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2016.1154208. · DOI
- G. Li, R. Law, H. Q. Vu, J. Rong, and X. Zhao, "Identifying Emerging Hotel Preferences Using Emerging Pattern Mining Technique," Tourism Management 46 (2015): 311-321, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2014.06.015. · DOI
- H. Min and J. C. Park, "Identifying Helpful Reviews Based on Customer's Mentions About Experiences," Expert Systems with Applications 39, no. 15 (2012): 11830-11838, https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.01.116. · DOI · Paper page
- C. Chakrabarti and G. F. Luger, "Artificial Conversations for Customer Service Chatter Bots: Architecture, Algorithms, and Evaluation Metrics," Expert Systems with Applications 42, no. 20 (2015): 6878-6897, https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.eswa.2015.04.067. · DOI
- R. Ullah, N. Amblee, W. Kim, and H. Lee, "From Valence to Emotions: Exploring the Distribution of Emotions in Online Product Reviews," Decision Support Systems 81 (2016): 41- 53, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2015.10.007. · DOI
- T. Hou, B. Yannou, Y. Leroy, and E. Poirson, "Mining Customer Product Reviews for Product Development: A Sum- marization Process," Expert Systems with Applications 132 (2019): 141-150, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.04.069. · DOI
- V. Srivastava and A. D. Kalro, "Enhancing the Helpfulness of Online Consumer Reviews: The Role of Latent (Content) Fac- tors," Journal of Interactive Marketing 48, no. 1 (2019): 33-50, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2018.12.003. · DOI
- W. L. Chang and J. Y. Wang, "A 2020 Perspective on "Mine Is Yours? Using Sentiment Analysis to Explore the Degree of Risk in Sharing Economy"," Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 40 (2020): 100934, https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.elerap.2020.100934. · DOI
- A. Ray, P. K. Bala, and Y. K. Dwivedi, "Exploring Values Affecting e-Learning Adoption From the User-Generated- Content: A Consumption-Value-Theory Perspective," Journal of Strategic Marketing 29, no. 5 (2021): 430-452, https:// doi.org/10.1080/0965254X.2020.1749875. · DOI
- L. Shen and S. Ross, "Information Value of Property Descrip- tion: A Machine Learning Approach," Journal of Urban Eco- nomics 121 (2021): 103299, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2020. 103299. · DOI
- Y. Piris and A. C. Gay, "Customer Satisfaction and Natural Lan- guage Processing," Journal of Business Research 124 (2021): 264-271, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.11.065. · DOI
- S. M. Mudambi and D. Schuff, "Research note: What Makes a Helpful Online Review? A Study of Customer Reviews on Amazon.com," MIS Quarterly 34, no. 1 (2010): 185, https:// doi.org/10.2307/20721420. · DOI
- H. Baek, J. Ahn, and Y. Choi, "Helpfulness of Online Con- sumer Reviews: Readers' Objectives and Review Cues," Inter- national Journal of Electronic Commerce 17, no. 2 (2012): 99-126, https://doi.org/10.2753/JEC1086-4415170204. · DOI
- A. Ghose, P. G. Ipeirotis, and B. Li, "Designing Ranking Sys- tems for Hotels on Travel Search Engines by Mining User- Generated and Crowdsourced Content," Marketing Science 31, no. 3 (2012): 493-520, https://doi.org/10.1287/ mksc.1110.0700. · DOI · Paper page
- D. M. Blei, A. Y. Ng, and M. I. Jordan, "Latent Dirichlet Allo- cation," Journal of Machine Learning Research 3 (2003): 993- 1022.
- D. M. Blei, "Probabilistic Topic Models," Communications of the ACM 55, no. 4 (2012): 77-84, https://doi.org/10.1145/ 2133806.2133826. · DOI · Paper page
- G. A. Miller, "WordNet: A Lexical Database for English," Communications of the ACM 38, no. 11 (1995): 39-41, https://doi.org/10.1145/219717.219748. · DOI · Paper page
- B. Pang, L. Lee, and S. Vaithyanathan, "Thumbs Up? Senti- ment Classification Using Machine Learning Techniques" 2002, https://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0205070. · arXiv
- B. Pang and L. Lee, "Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis," Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval 2, no. 1-2 (2008): 1-135, https://doi.org/10.1561/1500000011. · DOI · Paper page
- S. M. Mohammad and P. D. Turney, "Crowdsourcing a Word- Emotion Association Lexicon," Computational Intelligence 29, no. 3 (2013): 436-465, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8640. 2012.00460.x. · DOI
- N. Gozuacik, C. O. Sakar, and S. Ozcan, "Social Media-Based Opinion Retrieval for Product Analysis Using Multi-Task Deep Neural Networks," Expert Systems with Applications 183 (2021): 115388, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021. 115388. · DOI
- T. Dotzel and V. Shankar, "The Relative Effects of Business-to- Business (vs. Business-to-Consumer) Service Innovations on Firm Value and Firm Risk: An Empirical Analysis," Journal of Marketing 83, no. 5 (2019): 133-152, https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0022242919847221. 16 Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies · DOI
- M. Mustak, J. Salminen, L. Plé, and J. Wirtz, "Artificial Intelli- gence in Marketing: Topic Modeling, Scientometric Analysis, and Research Agenda," Journal of Business Research 124 (2021): 389-404, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.044. · DOI
- C. M. Feng, A. Park, L. Pitt, J. Kietzmann, and G. Northey, "Artificial Intelligence in Marketing: A Bibliographic Perspec- tive," Australasian Marketing Journal 29, no. 3 (2021): 252- 263, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2020.07.006. · DOI
- S. Melumad, J. J. Inman, and M. T. Pham, "Selectively Emotional: How Smartphone Use Changes User-Generated Content," Journal of Marketing Research 56, no. 2 (2019): 259-275, https://doi.org/10.1177/0022243718815429. · DOI
- J. Hartmann, M. Heitmann, C. Siebert, and C. Schamp, "More Than a Feeling: Accuracy and Application of Sentiment Anal- ysis," International Journal of Research in Marketing 40, no. 1 (2023): 75-87, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2022.05.005. 17 Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Shopping by algorithm: How agentic AI deploys human heuristics as a surrogate consumer
Wadi, D., & Ma, Y. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.28372
- Authors
- Prasanna, A., & Kushwaha, B. P.
- Affiliations
- Vellore Institute of Technology University (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Kushwaha, Bijay Prasad
- Venue
- Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2025-01
- Volume
- 2025
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2578-1863 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4412408993
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 17.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Marketing and Advertising Strategies
- Keywords
- generative AI, marketing, sentiment analysis, text mining, big data analytics, user-generated content, research trends, research gaps
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review