Shopping by algorithm: How agentic AI deploys human heuristics as a surrogate consumer

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

In agentic commerce, seller-side agents may adapt product information in response to how buyer agents search, creating strategic interactions that the design does not capture.

“In agentic commerce, seller-side agents may adapt product information in response to how buyer agents search, creating strategic interactions that our design does not capture (Calvano et al., 2020).”

• cites Calvano et al., 2020 sourcePartly supported

  The opening section (page unavailable) describes autonomous seller-side pricing agents adapting their strategies and interacting in simulated marketplaces. It does not address sellers changing product information in response to buyer agents’ searches; its strategic interactions are among competing pricing agents. The statement about what the citing authors’ design omits is their own framing, not a finding attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.84)

  Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

May combine two claims.

In Study 1 Tool-Lab, the negative effect of acquisition cost on diagnostic acquisition is significant under a vague goal prompt (a1 + a3 = -1.997, SD = 0.487, 95% CI [-2.952, -1.003]), whereas under a specific goal prompt it is not (a1 = -0.270, SD = 0.217, 95% CI [-0.698, 0.161]).

“Specifically, the negative effect of acquisition cost on diagnostic acquisition is significant under a vague goal prompt (a 1 + a 3 = -1.997,SD = 0.487, 95% CI [-2.952, -1.003]), compared to the specific goal prompt (a 1 = -0.270,SD = 0.217, 95% CI [-0.698, 0.161]).”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

Vague instructions made agents vulnerable to marketing cues.

“Because vague instructions made agents vulnerable to marketing cues”

May combine two claims.

In Study 2 Tool-Lab, imposing acquisition costs significantly reduces diagnostic acquisition under the vague goal prompt (aVague = -3.576, SD = 1.218, 95% CI [-5.925, -1.062]), whereas under the specific goal prompt this reduction is attenuated and overlaps zero (a1 = -0.674, SD = 0.462, 95% CI [-1.582, 0.260]).

“Imposing acquisition costs significantly reduces diagnostic acquisition under the vague goal prompt (a Vague = -3.576,SD = 1.218, 95% CI [-5.925, -1.062]), whereas under the specific goal prompt, this reduction is attenuated and overlaps zero (a 1 = -0.674,SD = 0.462, 95% CI [-1.582, 0.260]).”

May combine two claims.

Boundary conditions were found for two LLMs: Luna maintained diagnostic acquisition under cost, and Flash Lite made suboptimal choices even with complete information.

“We found boundary conditions for two LLMs.Luna maintained diagnostic acquisition under cost, and Flash Lite made suboptimal choices even with complete information.”

May combine two claims.

When price was consolidated into a single attribute, truncation shifted to weight, and the pathway replicated for the three Gemini LLMs tested.

“When price was consolidated into a single attribute, truncation shifted to weight, and the pathway replicated for the three Gemini LLMs tested (Table W11).”

May combine two claims.

In the price partitioning experiment, LLMs inspected the price cells for both alternatives in most sessions under cost (M = 1.96 to 2.00), but reduced acquisitions of weight considerably (M = 0.56 to 1.71).

“The LLMs inspected the price cells for both alternatives in most session under cost (M = 1.96 to 2.00), but reduced acquisitions of weight considerably (M = 0.56 to 1.71).”

May combine two claims.

In the price partitioning experiment, the Index of Moderated Mediation was credibly negative for all three LLMs: Flash Lite (IMM = -0.357, 95% CI [-0.486, -0.228]), Flash (IMM = -0.149, 95% CI [-0.219, -0.078]), and Pro (IMM = -0.622, 95% CI [-0.716, -0.526]).

“Supporting H3, the Index of Moderated Mediation (IMM = a 3 × b 1 ) was credibly negative for all three LLMs: Flash Lite (IMM = -0.357,95% CI [-0.486, -0.228]), Flash (IMM = -0.149,95% CI [-0.219, -0.078]), and Pro (IMM = -0.622,95% CI [-0.716, -0.526]).”

May combine two claims.

Consolidating price components shifts acquisition truncation from cents to weight and replicates the hypothesized structural pathways (H1-H3).

“Rather, consolidating price components shifts acquisition truncation from cents to weight and replicates the hypothesized structural pathways (H1-H3).”

May combine two claims.

Flash Lite was the exception: when given complete diagnostic information under zero cost, it selected the optimal alternative in 4.0% of sessions in Study 1 and 0.0% in Study 2.

“Flash Lite was the exception.When given complete diagnostic information under zero cost, it selected the optimal alternative in 4.0% of sessions in Study 1 and 0.0% in Study 2 (Web Appendix F).”

May combine two claims.

Whenever diagnostic attributes were inspected, every LLM computed total prices and unit values without mathematical error.

“Whenever diagnostic attributes were inspected, every LLM computed total prices, and unit values without mathematical error.”

May combine two claims.

In Study 2 Baseline, Opus over-weighs discounts slightly (ratio = 1.15, 95% CI [1.11, 1.19]), whereas Flash Lite under-weights discount savings (ratio = 0.72, 95% CI [0.67, 0.77]).

“Opus over-weighs discounts slightly (ratio = 1.15, 95% CI [1.11, 1.19]), whereas Flash Lite under-weights discount savings (ratio = 0.72, 95% CI [0.67, 0.77]).”

Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

Lack of specificity in the delegation prompt can lead to suboptimal choices.

“Lack of specificity in the delegation prompt can lead to suboptimal choices”

May combine two claims.

Holding volume constant, sessions articulating an absolute-price objective acquired fewer diagnostic attributes and were 42 to 64 percentage points less likely to select the optimal alternative.

“Holding volume constant, sessions articulating an absolute-price objective acquired fewer diagnostic attributes and were 42 to 64 percentage points less likely to select the optimal alternative (Table W14).”

May combine two claims.

In Study 1 Tool-Lab, the conditional indirect effect of acquisition cost on choice optimality via diagnostic acquisition is negative under a vague goal prompt (indirect effect = -0.522, SD = 0.132, 95% CI [-0.783, -0.256]) but overlaps zero under a specific goal prompt (indirect effect = -0.070, SD = 0.057, 95% CI [-0.184, 0.044]).

“Specifically, the conditional indirect effect is negative under a vague goal prompt (indirect effect = -0.522,SD = 0.132, 95% CI [-0.783, -0.256]), but overlaps zero under a specific goal prompt (indirect effect = -0.070,SD = 0.057, 95% CI [-0.184, 0.044]).”

May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

In Study 2 Tool-Lab, imposing the $50.00 acquisition cost under the vague goal prompt produced a substantial reduction in diagnostic acquisition (M = 4.82, SD = 3.49) and choice optimality (M = 0.48, SD = 0.29), with reductions in discount percentage (M = 1.58, SD = 1.23) and weight (M = 1.31, SD = 1.14).

“However, imposing the $50.00 acquisition cost under the vague goal prompt produced a substantial reduction in diagnostic acquisition (M = 4.82, SD = 3.49) and choice optimality (M = 0.48, SD = 0.29).”

• Also stated in: § Results · plain

  “Examining individual attributes shows that while acquisitions for list price remained relatively higher (M = 1.94,SD = 1.24), the LLMs reduced both discount percentage (M = 1.58,SD = 1.23) and weight (M = 1.31,SD = 1.14).”

May combine two claims.

In the purchase volume experiment, Flash Lite retained cents (M ≈ 2.00) but reduced weight acquisitions (M = 1.82 to 1.30), diagnostic acquisition (M = 5.77 to 5.30) and optimality from .62 to .37.

“Flash Lite retained cents (M ≈ 2.00) but reduced weight acquisitions (M = 1.82 to 1.30), diagnostic acquisition (M = 5.77 to 5.30) and optimality from .62 to .37.”

May combine two claims.

Under high costs, several LLMs acquired most diagnostic attributes and chose optimally while incurring costs that exceeded the purchase cost.

“Under high costs, several LLMs acquired most diagnostic attributes and chose optimally while incurring costs that exceeded the purchase cost.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

Agreement with the human criterion was highest for the Nemotron judge, which was therefore designated as the primary instrument.

“Agreement with the human criterion was highest for the Nemotron judge, which was therefore designated as the primary instrument.”

May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

In Study 2 Tool-Lab, imposing the $50.00 acquisition cost under the specific goal prompt produced a small reduction in diagnostic acquisition (M = 8.26, SD = 1.03) and choice optimality (M = 0.88, SD = 0.23), driven primarily by omission of discount percentage (M = 2.50, SD = 0.59).

“Imposing the $50.00 acquisition cost produced a small reduction in diagnostic acquisition (M = 8.26, SD = 1.03) and choice optimality (M = 0.88, SD = 0.23).”

• Also stated in: § Results · plain

  “The reduction was driven primarily by the omission of discount percentage (M = 2.50, SD = 0.59).”

May combine two claims.

In the purchase volume experiment, the objective Pro adopted shifted with purchase volume: at one bag, 62.0% of Pro sessions started by articulating a unit-price objective, with 38.0% articulating an absolute price objective; at 50 and 250 bags, absolute price objective increased monotonically (83.0% and 84.0%, respectively).

“In contrast, the objective Pro adopted shifted with purchase volume.At one bag, 62.0% of Pro sessions started by articulating a unit-price objective, with 38.0% articulating an absolute price objective.At 50 and 250 bags, absolute price objective increased monotonically (83.0% and 84.0%, respectively; Table W13).”

May combine two claims.

In the purchase volume experiment, Flash adopted a unit-price minimization objective in 90.8% to 94.0% of sessions and adopted an absolute price minimization objective in at most 4.0% of sessions.

“Based on the classification, Flash adopted a unit-price minimization objective (price_per_weight) in 90.8% to 94.0% of sessions and adopted an absolute price minimization objective in at most 4.0% of sessions (Table W13; Figure W1, Panel A).”

May combine two claims.

In Study 2 Baseline, for six of the eight LLMs (Flash, Pro, Sonnet, Luna, Terra, and Sol), the ratio of marginal utility for discount savings relative to list price disutility ranges between 0.99 and 1.03, 95% confidence intervals include 1.00, and the ratio is similar to the normative benchmark.

“For six of the eight LLMs (Flash, Pro, Sonnet, Luna, Terra, and Sol), the ratio ranges between 0.99 and 1.03, 95% confidence intervals include 1.00, and the ratio is similar to the normative benchmark (Table W16).”

May combine two claims.

Under the vague goal prompt at zero acquisition cost, diagnostic acquisition (M = 5.86) and choice optimality (M = 0.89) were high.

“Under the vague goal prompt at zero acquisition cost, diagnostic acquisition (M = 5.86, SD = 0.24) and choice optimality (M = 0.89, SD = 0.19) were high, with high acquisitions for dollars (M = 2.00, SD = 0.00), cents (M = 1.97,SD = 0.09), and weight (M = 1.90, SD = 0.18).”

May combine two claims.

Under the specific goal prompt, acquisition cost primarily reduced acquisition of cents in Study 1 and discount percentage in Study 2, which are the same attributes the normative policy abandons first as cost rises.

“Under the specific goal prompt, acquisition cost primarily reduced acquisition of cents in Study 1 and discount percentage in Study 2, which are the same attributes the normative policy abandons first as cost rises (Web Appendix H).”

May combine two claims.

As purchase volume increased from one to 250 bags, the share of Pro's pre-search reasoning traces that articulated an absolute-price objective increased from 38% to 84%, diagnostic acquisition fell from 5.55 to 4.22, and choice optimality fell from .80 to .35.

“Instead, as we exogenously increased volumne from one to 250 bags, the share of Pro's pre-search reasoning traces that articulated an absolute-price objective increased from 38% to 84%, diagnostic acquisition fell from 5.55 to 4.22, and choice optimality fell from .80 to .35(Figure W1).”

May combine two claims.

Within every volume condition, Pro sessions adopting an absolute price objective acquired significantly fewer diagnostic attributes (differences ranging from -1.10 to -1.95 cells; all 95% bootstrap CIs exclude zero) and were 42 to 64 percentage points less likely to select the optimal alternative.

“Within every volume condition, Pro sessions adopting an absolute price objective acquired significantly fewer diagnostic attributes (differences ranging from -1.10 to -1.95 cells; all 95% bootstrap CIs exclude zero) and were 42 to 64 percentage points less likely to select the optimal alternative (Table W14).”

May combine two claims.

In the purchase volume experiment, Pro reduced diagnostic acquisition from M = 5.55 to 4.22 (cents: 1.81 to 1.30; weight: 1.74 to 0.92) and optimality from .80 to .35.

“Pro reduced diagnostic acquisition from M = 5.55 to 4.22 (cents: 1.81 to 1.30; weight: 1.74 to 0.92) and optimality from .80 to .35.”

May combine two claims.

The ratio of cent-to-dollar sensitivity ranges from 0.55 to 1.12, and seven out of eight LLMs' 95% confidence interval contains 1.00.

“The ratio of cent-to-dollar sensitivity ranges from 0.55 to 1.12, and seven out of eight LLMs' 95% confidence interval contains 1.00 (Table W2).”

May combine two claims.

In the purchase volume experiment, scaling from 1 to 250 bags reduces diagnostic acquisitions for Flash Lite and Pro, while Flash remained at ceiling (M = 6.00; optimality = 1.00).

“Flash remained at ceiling (M = 6.00; optimality = 1.00), but scaling from 1 to 250 bags reduces diagnostic acquisitions for Flash Lite and Pro (Figure W1; Table W12).”

May combine two claims.

The pathway replicated across prompt phrasings and when price was consolidated into a single attribute.

“The pathway also replicated across prompt phrasings and when price was consolidated into a single attribute (Table W8; Table W11).”

May combine two claims.

Imposing the $10.00 acquisition cost under a specific goal prompt produced a small reduction in diagnostic acquisition (M = 5.72) and choice optimality (M = 0.83), driven exclusively by the omission of cents.

“Imposing the $10.00 acquisition cost produced a small reduction in diagnostic acquisition (M = 5.72, SD = 0.59) and choice optimality (M = 0.83, SD = 0.30).Attribute-level acquisitions show that weight (M = 2.00, SD = 0.00) and dollars (M = 2.00, SD = 0.00) remained at ceiling.The reduction was driven exclusively by the omission of cents (M = 1.72,SD = 0.59).”

May combine two claims.

Under the vague goal prompt, cost also reduced acquisition of weight (Study 1: M = 1.10 of 2; Study 2: M = 1.31 of 3), which is a diagnostic attribute under a unit-price objective but non-diagnostic under an absolute-price objective.

“Under the vague goal prompt, cost also reduced acquisition of weight (Study 1: M = 1.10 of 2; Study 2: M = 1.31 of 3), which is a diagnostic attribute under a unit-price objective but non-diagnostic under a absolute-price objective.”

May combine two claims.

Seven of the eight LLMs weighted cents at the same rate as whole dollars, and six of the eight LLMs weighted a dollar saved through a discount like a dollar spent through list price.

“Seven of the eight LLMs weighted cents at the same rate as whole dollars (Table W2), and six of the eight LLMs weighted a dollar saved through a discount like a dollar spent through list price (Table W16).”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite could not be classified because its default thinking level is minimal, so it emits no reasoning prior to acquisition and the classification task is undefined for it.

“Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite could not be classified.Its default thinking level is minimal, so it emits no reasoning prior to acquisition and the classification task is undefined for it.”

May combine two claims.

Under the specific goal prompt in the price partitioning experiment, acquisition costs have zero effect on diagnostic acquisitions and optimality.

“Under the specific goal prompt (”

May combine two claims.

For Flash Lite, the interaction (a3) and IMM are credibly negative under the original prompt (a3 = -0.441, 95% CI [-0.698, -0.186]; IMM = -0.133, 95% CI [-0.219, -0.054]) and the cost paraphrase (a3 = -0.519, 95% CI [-0.750, -0.289]; IMM = -0.140, 95% CI [-0.218, -0.072]), but overlap zero under sentence reordering (a3 = -0.120, 95% CI [-0.375, 0.140]; IMM = -0.029, 95% CI [-0.093, 0.034]).

“For Flash Lite, the interaction (a 3 ) and the Index of Moderated Mediation (IMM) are credibly negative under the original prompt (a 3 = -0.441,95% CI [-0.698, -0.186]; IMM = -0.133,95% CI [-0.219, -0.054]) and the cost paraphrase (a 3 = -0.519,95% CI [-0.750, -0.289]; IMM = -0.140,95% CI [-0.218, -0.072]), but overlap zero under sentence reordering (a 3 = -0.120,95% CI [-0.375, 0.140]; IMM = -0.”

May combine two claims.

In Study 2 Baseline, across all eight LLMs, base list price enters negatively (βLP = -1.06 to -3.08, p < .001) and discount amount (in dollars) enters positively (βDA = 0.76 to 3.08, p < .001).

“Across all eight LLMs, base list price enters negatively (β LP = -1.06 to -3.08, p < .001)and discount amount (in dollars) enters positively (β DA = 0.76 to 3.08, p < .001).”

May combine two claims.

In Study 2 Tool-Lab, under the vague goal prompt at zero acquisition cost, diagnostic acquisition (M = 9.00, SD = 0.00) and choice optimality (M = 0.86, SD = 0.31) were high, with complete acquisitions for list price, discount percentage, and weight.

“Under the vague goal prompt at zero acquisition cost, diagnostic acquisition (M = 9.00, SD = 0.00) and choice optimality (M = 0.86, SD = 0.31) were high, with complete acquisitions for list price (M = 3.00, SD = 0.00), discount percentage (M = 3.00, SD = 0.00), and weight (M = 3.00, SD = 0.00).”

May combine two claims.

In Study 2 Tool-Lab, under the specific goal prompt at zero cost, diagnostic acquisition was near complete across all attributes (M = 8.98, SD = 0.03), and choice optimality was high (M = 0.90, SD = 0.25).

“Aggregated across all LLMs tested (Table 3; per LLM descriptives in Table W18), under the specific goal prompt at zero cost, diagnostic acquisition was near complete across all attributes (M = 8.98, SD = 0.03), and choice optimality was high (M = 0.90, SD = 0.25).”

May combine two claims.

In Study 1 Tool-Lab, the indirect pathway from acquisition cost to choice optimality via diagnostic acquisition is broadly consistent across the evaluated LLMs, with the exception of Luna, whose IMM overlapped zero (IMM = -0.063, 95% CI [-0.158, 0.033]).

“Disaggregated analyses indicate that this indirect pathway is broadly consistent across the evaluated LLMs, with one exception.Luna maintained diagnostic acquisition under vague goal prompt with an IMM that overlapped zero (IMM = -0.063,95% CI [-0.158, 0.033]).”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

Coffee C and Coffee D are exactly indifferent at the complete Study 2 state by construction, both at 1.0000, and both are inferior to Coffee E.

“Coffee C and Coffee D are exactly indifferent at the complete Study 2 state by construction, both at 1.0000, and both are inferior to Coffee E.”

May combine two claims.

In Study 2, despite computing net unit prices with 100.0% accuracy, Flash Lite selected the optimal alternative (Coffee E) in 24.0% of sessions under zero cost and 34.0% under costly acquisition.

“In Study 2, despite computing net unit prices with 100.0%accuracy, Flash Lite selected the optimal alternative (Coffee E) in 24.0% of sessions under zero cost and 34.0%under costly acquisition.”

May combine two claims.

The contrast between sessions stating a price objective and those stating a price-per-weight objective is of the same sign and comparable magnitude under all three judges, ranging from -1.38 to -1.56 diagnostic cells and from -.49 to -.55 in optimality, with overlapping confidence intervals throughout.

“The contrast is of the same sign and comparable magnitude under all three judges, ranging from -1.38 to -1.56 diagnostic cells and from -.49 to -.55 in optimality, with overlapping confidence intervals throughout.”

May combine two claims.

The proportion stating a price objective rises from .35-.39 at one bag to .80-.85 at 250 bags, and the three judge classifications for price differ by at most .09 at any purchase volume.

“The proportion stating a price objective rises from .35-.39 at one bag to .80-.85 at 250 bags, and the three judge classifications for price differ by at most .09at any purchase volume.”

May combine two claims.

Given free acquisition (c = $0.00) and small cost (c = $0.01), both planning horizons acquire all 6 diagnostic cells (2 dollars, 2 cents, 2 weights) and choose optimally (100%).

“Given free acquisition (c = $0.00)and small cost (c = $0.01),both planning horizons acquire all 6 diagnostic cells (2 dollars, 2 cents, 2 weights) and choose optimally (100%).”

• AssumptionThe authors state this as an assumption: Under partial information, price and weight are independently distributed across alternatives in the market prior.
• AssumptionThe authors state this as an assumption: For discount percentage (D discount ), the paper assumes a discrete uniform distribution U{0, 40} in 5% increments (M = 20.0%).
• AssumptionThe authors state this as an assumption: Each quantized outcome x ∈ D k [I L ] is assigned an equal probability mass P (x) = 1/L.

May combine two claims.

When search truncation occurs, LLMs exhibit high fidelity to their information states, generally do not fabricate valuations.

“Second, the results indicate that when search truncation occurs, LLMs exhibit high fidelity to their information states, generally do not fabricate valuations.”

May combine two claims.

Where weight is revealed, E[1/W j | s] = 1/W j ; where it is withheld, the expected inverse weight over the empirical domain is E[1/W ] = 0.400, which is a common factor across alternatives and does not affect the ranking.

“Where weight is revealed, E[1/W j | s] = 1/W j ; where it is withheld, the expected inverse weight over the empirical domain is E[1/W ] = 0.400, which is a common factor across alternatives and does not affect the ranking.”

May combine two claims.

In Study 1, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite computed the unit values of Coffee B (2.200 oz/$) and Coffee A (2.004 oz/$) with 100.0% accuracy, yet selected Coffee A in 22.0% of sessions under zero cost and 20.0% under costly acquisition.

“In Study 1, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite computed the unit values of Coffee B (2.200 oz/$) and Coffee A (2.004 oz/$) with 100.0%accuracy, yet selected Coffee A in 22.0% of sessions under zero cost and 20.0% under costly acquisition.”

May combine two claims.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite selected the optimal alternative in 4 percent of sessions in Study 1 and 0 percent in Study 2 when provided with complete diagnostic information under zero cost.

“When provided with complete diagnostic information under zero cost, it selected the optimal alternative in 4 percent of sessions in Study 1 and 0 percent in Study 2.”

May combine two claims.

Under $10 cost, search depth truncates to 3 tool calls (2 weights, 1 dollar).

“Under $10 cost, (c = $10.00)search depth truncates to 3 tool calls (2 weights, 1 dollar).”

• AssumptionThe authors state this as an assumption: Under partial information, price and weight are independently distributed across alternatives in the market prior.
• AssumptionThe authors state this as an assumption: For discount percentage (D discount ), the paper assumes a discrete uniform distribution U{0, 40} in 5% increments (M = 20.0%).
• AssumptionThe authors state this as an assumption: Each quantized outcome x ∈ D k [I L ] is assigned an equal probability mass P (x) = 1/L.

May combine two claims.

Incorrect (unknown) was 0.0% across all conditions, indicating that the LLMs did not misclassify inspected attributes as uninspected.

“Furthermore, Incorrect (unknown) was 0.0% across all conditions, indicating that the LLMs did not misclassify inspected attributes as uninspected.”

May combine two claims.

Across all truncated states, these seven LLMs selected the alternative implied by the Expectimax policy in 99.3 percent of sessions (2,434 of 2,450 trials) and 3,128 of 3,150 trials (99.3%) across all states.

“Across all truncated states, these seven LLMs selected the alternative implied by the Expectimax policy in 99.3 percent of sessions (2,434 of 2,450 trials) and 3,128 of 3,150 trials (99.3%) across all states.”

May combine two claims.

Where the cents are withheld, E[Cents] = 52.93 cents all alternatives equally; where the discount is withheld, E[Discount] = 20.0% does the same.

“Where the cents are withheld, E[Cents] = 52.93ćenters all alternatives equally; where the discount is withheld, E[Discount] = 20.0%does the same.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

The authors do not attempt to explain differences between individual LLMs because the characteristics that distinguish commercial LLMs, such as training data, tool-use tuning, and reasoning-effort settings, are undisclosed and vary together.

“We do not attempt to explain differences between individual LLMs, because the characteristics that distinguish commercial LLMs, such as training data, tool-use tuning, and reasoning-effort settings, are undisclosed and vary together.”

• AssumptionRests on an assumption: The characteristics that distinguish commercial LLMs, such as training data, tool-use tuning, and reasoning-effort settings, are undisclosed and vary together.

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

Foundation model providers calibrate the trade-off between inference speed/API operating costs and output accuracy during instruction-tuning and RLHF.

“Foundation model providers calibrate this trade-off during instruction-tuning and Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) to optimize inference speed and API operating costs against output accuracy.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

All tool responses are validated against strict JSON schemas.

“all tool responses are validated against strict JSON schemas (detailed specifications and snapshot identifiers are provided in Web Appendix I).”

May combine two claims.

The assignment of promotional discounts was balanced across all four brands (χ2(3)=2.42, p=.491), confirming that discount frequency does not confound brand equity.

“The assignment of promotional discounts was balanced across all four brands (χ 2 (3) = 2.42, p = .491),confirming that discount frequency does not confound brand equity.”

Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

Vague prompts can leave AI agents to pursue simpler objectives under constraints and can lead to suboptimal purchases.

“Vague prompts can leave AI agents to pursue simpler objectives under constraints and can lead to suboptimal purchases.”

Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

The judge received no other part of the session, and observed neither the final choice nor any tool call, so the classification cannot be informed by the behavior it is subsequently used to describe.

“The judge received no other part of the session, and observed neither the final choice nor any tool call, so the classification cannot be informed by the behavior it is subsequently used to describe.”

Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

The studies placed a single AI shopping agent in a static environment.

“Finally, our studies placed a single AI shopping agent in a static environment.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

Internal acquisition costs reflect computational resource allocation and provider-level LLM tuning, including allocated reasoning effort and propensity to execute multi-turn tool calls.

“Internal acquisition costs reflect computational resource allocation and provider-level LLM tuning.These include the LLM's allocated reasoning effort and its propensity to execute multi-turn tool calls before terminating search.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

The Tool-Lab studies used one stimulus configuration per study, with two alternatives in Study 1 and three in Study 2.

“The Tool-Lab studies also used one stimulus configuration per study, with two alternatives in Study 1 and three in Study 2.”

Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

The second stage of the mediation model utilizes a linear probability specification to avoid identification anomalies and non-linear scale distortions of logistic mediation.

“To avoid the identification anomalies and non-linear scale distortions of logistic mediation, the second stage utilizes a linear probability specification, which permits an exact additive decomposition of conditional indirect effects (Breen et al., 2013) and formal evaluation of the Index of Moderated Mediation (a 3 × b 1 ; H3).”

• cites Breen et al., 2013 sourceNot checked — no full text of the source

Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

The hypotheses concern the pattern across the sample of LLMs tested.

“Our hypotheses concern the pattern across the sample of LLMs we tested”

May combine two claims.

Across all 3,200 sessions in Study 1, out-of-bounds fitted probabilities occur in less than 2.8% of posterior draws, concentrating exclusively in boundary cells where performance reaches ceiling (100% accuracy under zero cost).

“Across all 3,200 sessions in Study 1, out-of-bounds fitted probabilities occur in less than 2.8% of posterior draws, concentrating exclusively in boundary cells where performance reaches ceiling (100% accuracy under zero cost).”

Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

Obscuring diagnostic attributes could steer AI agents toward suboptimal choices.

“obscuring these attributes could steer agents toward suboptimal choices”

Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

Convergence was established by confirming that all potential scale reduction factors (R) were below 1.005, bulk effective sample sizes exceeded 2,500, and tail effective sample sizes exceeded 2,000 across all structural parameters.

“Convergence was established by confirming that all potential scale reduction factors ( R) were below 1.005, bulk effective sample sizes exceeded 2,500, and tail effective sample sizes exceeded 2,000 across all structural parameters.”

Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

The specific goal prompt named the normative objective exactly.

“Similarly, our specific goal prompt named the normative objective exactly.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

The multilevel model captures differences between LLMs as between-LLM heterogeneity.

“the multilevel model captures differences between LLMs as between-LLM heterogeneity.”

May combine two claims.

Tool-Lab shows what information an agent acquired and which objective it articulated, but not the internal mechanism that generated acquisitions and choice.

“Tool-Lab therefore shows what information an agent acquired and which objective it articulated, but not the internal mechanism that generated acquistions and choice.”

May combine two claims.

When information acquisition is free, LLMs can synthesize list prices, discounts, and product weight into utility-maximizing decisions, albeit in some cases over- or under-weighting the value of discounts.

“These baseline findings show that when information acquisition is free, LLMs can synthesize list prices, discounts, and product weight into utility-maximizing decisions, albeit in some cases over-(under-) weighting the value of discounts.”

May combine two claims.

In delegated purchasing, cue effectiveness is jointly determined by the retailer, through the information architecture, and by the consumer, through the delegation instruction, even though the consumer never encounters the cue.

“In delegated purchasing, cue effectiveness is therefore jointly determined by the retailer, through the information architecture, and by the consumer, through the delegation instruction, even though the consumer never encounters the cue.”

Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

The primary outcome, choice optimality, evaluates whether the AI agent selected the alternative with the lowest unit price.

“Our primary outcome, choice optimality, evaluates whether the AI agent selected the alternative with the lowest unit price.”

May combine two claims.

The presentation of brands across display positions was independent (χ2(9)=9.21, p=.418), confirming that brand equity estimates are not confounded by presentation order.

“The presentation of brands across display positions was independent (χ 2 (9) = 9.21, p = .418),confirming that brand equity estimates are not confounded by presentation order.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

The studies include robustness tests and validation experiments.

“Although the studies include robustness tests and validation experiments, several limitations qualify our findings and suggest directions for future research.”

May combine two claims.

While the large sample size (N=4,596) detects a minor deviation in brand presentation across display positions (χ2(9)=23.60, p=.005), the substantive association is negligible (Cramér's V=0.041); this variation is controlled for by including display position fixed effects.

“Finally, while the large sample size (N = 4,596) detects a minor deviation in brand presentation across display positions (χ 2 (9) = 23.60,p = .005),the substantive association is negligible (Cramér's V = 0.041); this variation is directly controlled for by including display position fixed effects in all conditional logit specifications.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

In standard commercial deployments, LLMs sample tokens from probability distributions, meaning identical prompts can generate heterogeneous search trajectories and final decisions.

“In standard commercial deployments, LLMs sample tokens from probability distributions, meaning identical prompts can generate heterogeneous search trajectories and final decisions.”

May combine two claims.

Choice optimality captures decision quality but not consumer welfare.

“Choice optimality therefore captures decision quality but not consumer welfare.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

Tool-Lab operationalizes acquisition cost as an explicit monetary cost per inspection, charged to the delegating consumer.

“Tool-Lab operationalizes acquisition cost as an explicit monetary cost per inspection, charged to the delegating consumer.”

Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

Reasoning traces were available only for LLMs whose providers expose them.

“reasoning traces were available only for LLMs whose providers expose them”

May combine two claims.

Both routes reduce the total acquisition cost of completing the task but lead to suboptimal choices when the omitted attributes determine the ranking of alternatives.

“Both routes reduce the total acquisition cost of completing the task, but both lead to suboptimal choices when the omitted attributes determine the ranking of alternatives.”

The quote only partly states this claim.

Under high acquisition costs, a vague goal prompt can reduce diagnostic acquisition through two routes: objective substitution and omission of low-value attributes.

“Under high acquisition costs, a vague goal prompt can reduce diagnostic acquisition through two routes.”

• Also stated in: § Goal specificity · plain

  “First, the LLM can substitute the normative objective (price per weight) with a simpler one (e.g., price), which shrinks the diagnostic set from attributes that determine price and weight to attributes that determine price alone.”

Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

Reasoning traces are verbal reports of how an LLM describes its task, not direct measures of the neural network activations that produce its behavior.

“reasoning traces are verbal reports of how an LLM describes its task, not direct measures of the neural network activations that produce its behavior.”

• cites Ericsson and Simon, 1998 sourceNot checked — no full text of the source
• cites Payne et al., 1993 sourceNot checked — no full text of the source

Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

A specific goal prompt explicitly defines the normative objective function to be optimized, which defines the diagnostic attribute set.

“A specific goal prompt explicitly defines the normative objective function to be optimized (e.g.,”

Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

Tool-Lab records the observable sequence of tool calls and, when providers expose them, the reasoning traces that precede those calls.

“Tool-Lab records the observable sequence of tool calls and, when providers expose them, the reasoning traces that precede those calls.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

Zero divergent transitions were encountered in either study.

“Zero divergent transitions were encountered in either study.”

Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

Following the moderated mediation taxonomy developed by Hayes (2018), the theoretical framework posits a first-stage moderation mechanism corresponding to Model 7.

“Following the moderated mediation taxonomy developed by Hayes (2018), our theoretical framework posits a first-stage moderation mechanism corresponding to Model 7.”

• cites Hayes (2018)Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

May combine two claims.

Tool-Lab observes information acquisition and choice, but not the internal mechanisms of the neural network.

“Tool-Lab observes the information acquisition and choice, but not the internal mechanisms of the neural network.”

May combine two claims.

Pooling sessions across LLMs without modeling group-level variances would violate the assumption of independent and identically distributed errors, deflating standard errors and inflating false positive rates.

“Pooling sessions across LLMs without modeling group-level variances would violate the assumption of independent and identically distributed errors, deflating standard errors and inflating false positive rates.”

• AssumptionRests on an assumption: Model families exhibit heterogeneous baseline propensities to execute tool calls, potentially distinct internal token representations of numeric information, and varying degrees of adherence to system instructions.

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

The presentation order of alternative options and attribute rows is randomized to prevent position confounds.

“Within each session, the presentation order of alternative options and attribute rows is randomized to prevent position confounds.”

May combine two claims.

Re-estimating the entire system using a non-linear Gaussian-mediator Bernoulli-outcome logistic specification confirms identical directional conclusions and statistical significance.

“Furthermore, as detailed in the sensitivity section below, re-estimating the entire system using a non-linear Gaussian-mediator Bernoulli-outcome logistic specification confirms identical directional conclusions and statistical significance.”

May combine two claims.

The results establish when search truncation produces heuristic-like choices, but do not rule out rival accounts of why truncation occurs, such as statistical regularities in training data or limits on planning.

“Our results establish when search truncation produces heuristic-like choices, but they do not rule out rival accounts of why truncation occurs, such as statistical regularities in training data or limits on planning.”

May combine two claims.

When attribute acquisition was costly and the delegating goal was vague, most evaluated LLMs omitted diagnostic attributes, and the resulting choices resembled human heuristic decisions.

“When attribute acquisition was costly and the delegating goal was vague, most evaluated LLMs omitted diagnostic attributes, and the resulting choices resembled human heuristic decisions.”

Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

Tool-Lab allows researchers to isolate whether a suboptimal choice occurred under complete diagnostic information (a utilization failure) or under incomplete diagnostic information (an acquisition failure).

“This allows us to isolate whether a suboptimal choice occurred under complete diagnostic information (a utilization failure) or under incomplete diagnostic information (an acquisition failure).”

May combine two claims.

LLMs neither conform strictly to classical economic assumptions of rationality, nor predictably replicate human bounded rationality.

“LLMs neither conform strictly to classical economic assumptions of rationality (Thaler, 2000), nor do they predictably replicate human bounded rationality (Kahneman, 2003).”

• cites Thaler, 2000Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

• cites Kahneman, 2003Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

May combine two claims.

The margin over the two replication judges is small relative to what 120 traces can resolve, and the substantive estimates do not depend on which judge supplies the labels.

“The margin over the two replication judges is small relative to what 120 traces can resolve, and the substantive estimates do not depend on which judge supplies the labels.”

May combine two claims.

Weight is a diagnostic attribute under unit-price minimization but non-diagnostic under price minimization.

“Weight acquisition is especially informative because weight is a diagnostic attribute under unit-price minimization (Web Appendix H), but non-diagnostic under price minimization.”

May combine two claims.

When price components are unified, acquisition cost under a vague goal prompt leads LLMs to truncate weight acquisitions, which leads to suboptimal choices.

“When price components are unified, acquisition cost under vague goal prompt leads the LLMs to truncate weight acquisitions, which leads to suboptimal choices.”

Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

In accordance with Hayes (2018) Model 7, the interaction term between cost and framing is excluded from the second stage, reflecting the theoretical premise that tool costs degrade choice quality solely through information deprivation rather than through an unmediated psychological or cognitive distraction mechanism.

“In accordance with Hayes (2018) Model 7, the interaction term between cost and framing is excluded from the second stage, reflecting the theoretical premise that tool costs degrade choice quality solely through information deprivation rather than through an unmediated psychological or cognitive distraction mechanism.”

• cites Hayes (2018)Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

The 'innate defect' account has operated as an implicit assumption across computer science research evaluating anomalies in LLMs.

“Despite the absence of direct empirical verification, this”

Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

A ratio β_C/β_D < 1.00 indicates cent discounting (inattention to cents relative to whole dollars), consistent with human left-digit bias.

“A ratio β C /β D < 1.00 indicates cent discounting [i.e., inattention to cents relative to whole dollars, consistent with human left-digit bias; Thomas and Morwitz (2005)].”

• cites Thomas and Morwitz (2005) sourceNot checked — no full text of the source

Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

Traces were classified only in the purchase volume study, which used three Gemini LLMs.

“we classified traces only in the purchase volume study, which used three Gemini LLMs.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

External acquisition costs arise from storefront architecture and environment design, including the structural placement and prominence of attributes.

“External acquisition costs arise from storefront architecture and environment design, including the structural placement and prominence of attributes within the prompt or the structure of API payloads.”

Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

Standard analytical approaches in experimental marketing research rely on single-level Ordinary Least Squares regression or path analysis with bootstrapped confidence intervals.

“Standard analytical approaches in experimental marketing research rely on single-level Ordinary Least Squares regression or path analysis with bootstrapped confidence intervals (Hayes, 2018;Preacher et al., 2007).”

• cites Hayes, 2018Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

• cites Preacher et al., 2007Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

Empirically verifying whether a suboptimal choice stems from heuristics embedded directly into an LLM's parameters is virtually impossible.

“Because modern LLMs are trained on uncurated, proprietary web-scale corpora spanning trillions of tokens, empirically verifying whether a suboptimal choice stems from heuristics embedded directly into its parameters is virtually impossible.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

Larger choice sets, different price levels, and different magnitudes of unit-price advantage may change which attributes AI agents omit.

“Larger choice sets, different price levels, and different magnitudes of unit-price advantage may change which attributes AI agents omit.”

May combine two claims.

For Flash Lite, sentence reordering acts as a boundary condition: placing the objective earlier in the prompt reduced the first-stage acquisition truncation to non-significance (a3 = -0.120) and attenuated the indirect effect (IMM = -0.029).

“For Flash Lite, sentence reordering acts as a boundary condition.Placing the objective earlier in the prompt reduced the first-stage acquisition truncation to non-significance (a 3 = -0.120),and accordingly attenuated the indirect effect (IMM = -0.029).”

Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

The single unambiguous product category allowed the authors to define choice optimality precisely and to benchmark search against a normative policy.

“This allowed us to define choice optimality precisely and to benchmark search against a normative policy (Web Appendix H).”

• AssumptionRests on an assumption: The single product category studied has an unambiguous normative objective of unit-price minimization.

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

This operationalization makes cost exogenous and measurable, but it differs from the internal costs AI agents encounter in deployment.

“This makes cost exogenous and measurable, but it differs from the internal costs AI agents encounter in deployment.”

Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

To prevent the letters 'a' or 'b' in coffee_a and coffee_b affecting the choice, each session randomizes the option_id.

“To prevent the letters”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

Whole dollars (D dollars ) are 25 discrete values spanning $0 to $53 (M = $15.96).

“Whole dollars (D dollars ) are 25 discrete values spanning $0 to $53 (M = $15.96).”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

Prior distributions are based on empirical instant coffee attributes collected from Walmart.com.

“Prior distributions are based on empirical instant coffee attributes collected from Walmart.com.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

We scale the purchase volume to five bags to ensure that the potential economic surplus of identifying the optimal product mathematically justifies the cumulative tool costs.

“We scale the purchase volume to five bags to ensure that the potential economic surplus of identifying the optimal product mathematically justifies the cumulative tool costs.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

Initial exposure to fields such as oz_per_usd and net_price_usd can prime the AI agent regarding which attributes are diagnostic and attenuate the ambiguity of the vague goal prompt.

“First, because tool schemas are declared to the LLM at the beginning of the session, initial exposure to fields such as oz_per_usd and net_price_usd can prime the AI agent regarding which attributes are diagnostic and attenuate the ambiguity of the vague goal prompt.”

May combine two claims.

When an LLM selects an economically suboptimal alternative under cost constraints, this choice can stem from an acquisition failure or from a utilization failure.

“When an LLM selects an economically suboptimal alternative under cost constraints, this choice can stem from an acquisition failure, in which the LLM truncates its search and never retrieves the diagnostic attributes required to compute unit price, or from a utilization failure, in which the LLM possesses the relevant attributes but fails to synthesize them into an accurate mathematical evaluation”

Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

The legal action space at an assigned information state contains only choose actions, since A reveal (s) = ∅ by construction.

“The legal action space at such a state contains only choose actions, since A reveal (s) = ∅ by construction.”

Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

The monetary penalty of search (C tool ) is amortized directly across the 5-bag purchase quantity (C tool /Q), establishing a dollar-for-ounce valuation that governs the optimal search threshold.

“The monetary penalty of search (C tool ) is amortized directly across the 5-bag purchase quantity (C tool /Q), establishing a dollar-for-ounce valuation that governs the optimal search threshold.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

This specification eliminates arbitrary subjective exchange rates.

“This specification eliminates arbitrary subjective exchange rates.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

Product weight (D weight ) are 57 continuous values spanning 0.42 oz to 71.99 oz (M = 10.33 oz).

“Product weight (D weight ) are 57 continuous values spanning 0.42 oz to 71.99 oz (M = 10.33 oz).”

May combine two claims.

The myopic policy (Depth = 1) captures the value of an attribute on its own but not the value of attributes that are informative only in combination.

“It therefore captures the value of an attribute on its own but not the value of attributes that are informative only in combination.”

Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

Generating the unit price conditions the subsequent selection of the option_id, which can artificially reduce suboptimal choices.

“Generating the unit price conditions the subsequent selection of the option_id, which can artificially reduce suboptimal choices.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

The terminal utility at assigned states reduces to U choose (j, s) = -E[P j | s] • E 1 W j s, evaluated over the empirical priors of the preceding section.

“The terminal utility reduces to U choose (j, s) = -E[P j | s] • E 1 W j s evaluated over the empirical priors of the preceding section.”

May combine two claims.

The evaluated LLMs have the arithmetic capability to calculate multi-attribute pricing metrics and accurately report attribute missingness when structured to do so.

“In summary, this experiment demonstrates that the evaluated LLMs have the arithmetic capability to calculate multi-attribute pricing metrics and accurately report attribute missingness when structured to do so.”

May combine two claims.

Asking an LLM to compute unit prices after it has already selected a product evaluates its capacity to solve an arithmetic task, but a successful post-choice calculation cannot establish whether those unit values were computed and utilized during the actual purchase decision.

“Asking an LLM to compute unit prices after it has already selected a product evaluates its capacity to solve an arithmetic task, but a successful post-choice calculation cannot establish whether those unit values were computed and utilized during the actual purchase decision.”

Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

The prompt lists every attribute present in the retail environment, ensuring that LLMs make decisions under explicit attribute missingness rather than assuming that unlisted attributes are absent or irrelevant.

“Nevertheless, the prompt lists every attribute present in the retail environment.This structure ensures that LLMs make decisions under explicit attribute missingness rather than assuming that unlisted attributes are absent or irrelevant.”

Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

Because autoregressive sampling produces stochastic variation across independent queries at default temperature, each experimental cell was evaluated over 100 independent Monte Carlo sessions with zero state retention between trials.

“Because autoregressive sampling produces stochastic variation across independent queries at default temperature, each experimental cell was evaluated over 100 independent Monte Carlo sessions with zero state retention between trials.”

• Also stated in: § Normative benchmark -Study 2 · plain

  “N = 100 independent simulations per cell.”

May combine two claims.

In Study 1, when cents were not provided, market priors assign symmetric expected cents to both options, making Coffee A the expected cost-minimizing choice conditional on the available information.

“In Study 1, when cents were not provided, market priors assign symmetric expected cents to both options, making Coffee A the expected cost-minimizing choice conditional on the available information.”

• AssumptionThe authors state this as an assumption: Under partial information, price and weight are independently distributed across alternatives in the market prior.
• AssumptionThe authors state this as an assumption: For discount percentage (D discount ), the paper assumes a discrete uniform distribution U{0, 40} in 5% increments (M = 20.0%).
• AssumptionThe authors state this as an assumption: Each quantized outcome x ∈ D k [I L ] is assigned an equal probability mass P (x) = 1/L.

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

Fractional cents (D cents ) are 45 discrete values spanning 0ć to 99ć (M = 52.93ć).

“Fractional cents (D cents ) are 45 discrete values spanning 0ć to 99ć (M = 52.93ć).”

Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

Anthropic has similarly deprecated custom sampling parameters.

“Anthropic has similarly deprecated custom sampling parameters (Anthropic, 2026).”

• cites Anthropic, 2026Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

The prompt in the reported valuations experiment is not byte-identical to the corresponding Tool-Lab conditions.

“Two differences from the main experiments should be noted, since the prompt is not byte-identical to the corresponding Tool-Lab conditions.”

Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

The authors required the LLMs to report their valuations concurrently with choice, within the parameter schema of the submit_choice tool, to ensure that reported metrics reflect the information state and calculations bound directly to the choice act.

“To ensure that reported metrics reflect the information state and calculations bound directly to the choice act, we required the LLMs to report their valuations concurrently with choice, within the parameter schema of the submit_choice tool.”

Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

Expectimax approximates the decision-theoretic solution to a Partially Observable Markov Decision Process (POMDP) under resource scarcity (Russell, 2010).

“Expectimax approximates the decision-theoretic solution to a Partially Observable Markov Decision Process (POMDP) under resource scarcity (Russell, 2010).”

• cites Russell, 2010Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

We retain the provider's default decoding configuration because our estimand is the behavior of LLMs as deployed in realistic agentic settings.

“We retain the provider's default decoding configuration because our estimand is the behavior of LLMs as deployed in realistic agentic settings.”

Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

Throughout all studies reported in the paper, we have used the provider default sampling parameters.

“Therefore, throughout all studies reported in the paper, we have used the provider default sampling parameters.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

Because no inspections occur at assigned states, C tool (s) = 0 at every assigned state.

“Because no inspections occur, C tool (s) = 0 at every assigned state.”

Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

Each cell in the reported valuations experiment was evaluated across 50 independent sessions with zero state retention between trials, yielding 800 unique sessions per study and 1,600 sessions in total.

“Each cell was evaluated across 50 independent sessions with zero state retention between trials, yielding 800 unique sessions per study and 1,600 sessions in total.”

May combine two claims.

The value function is invariant to the planning horizon, and the myopic and 2-step lookahead policies coincide at every assigned state.

“The value function is invariant to the planning horizon, and the myopic and 2-step lookahead policies coincide at every assigned state.”

• Also stated in: § Normative benchmark -assigned information states · plain

  “The normative choice is invariant to the planning horizon at every state for the reason given above.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

The critical frontier in marketing theory centers on the autonomous AI agent itself.

“yet the critical frontier in marketing theory centers on the autonomous AI agent itself(Aw et al., 2025;Dholakia et al., 2025;Puntoni and Wertenbroch, 2024).”

• cites Aw et al., 2025Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

• cites Dholakia et al., 2025 sourceNot checked — no full text of the source
• cites Puntoni and Wertenbroch, 2024 sourceNot checked — no full text of the source

Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

The results of the reported valuations experiment should be interpreted solely as a test of whether LLMs can compute the arithmetic, not how they behave under resource constraints.

“Because neither concurrent tool-schema modification nor post-choice elicitation is free from behavioral side effects, the results of this experiment should be interpreted solely as a test of whether LLMs can compute the arithmetic, not how they behave under resource constraints.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

The two sentences describing the acquisition cost and the inspect_cell tool are absent from the participant profile in the reported valuations experiment.

“First, the two sentences describing the acquisition cost and the inspect_cell tool are absent from the participant profile, but their removal is required by the design.”

Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

Every field emitted in the submit_choice payload was cross-referenced against the execution log of inspect_cell calls from that session to measure the validity of the reported valuations.

“To measure the validity of the reported valuations, every field emitted in the submit_choice payload was cross-referenced against the execution log of inspect_cell calls from that session.”

May combine two claims.

The indicator on the reveal branch of the Bellman recursion is never satisfied at assigned states, and V (s, d) = max j∈J U choose (j, s) for every d.

“The indicator on the reveal branch of the Bellman recursion is therefore never satisfied, and V (s, d) = max j∈J U choose (j, s) for every d.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

The revealed cells appear as payloads within the initial user turn rather than as tool results returned across successive turns in the reported valuations experiment.

“Second, the revealed cells appear as payloads within the initial user turn rather than as tool results returned across successive turns.”

May combine two claims.

Selecting the lower whole-dollar alternative when the cents are withheld, or the lowest-list-price alternative when weight is withheld, is optimal conditional on the state while producing an economically inferior outcome.

“Selecting the lower whole-dollar alternative when the cents are withheld, or the lowest-list-price alternative when weight is withheld, is optimal conditional on the state while producing an economically inferior outcome.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

By recursively computing the Expected Value of Information (EVI) for each available tool call, the Expectimax algorithm identifies the point at which the marginal informational benefit of inspecting an additional attribute no longer justifies the compounding financial search cost.

“By recursively computing the Expected Value of Information (EVI) for each available tool call, the algorithm identifies the point at which the marginal informational benefit of inspecting an additional attribute no longer justifies the compounding financial search cost.”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

For product weight, Jensen's inequality implies E[1/W ] ̸ = 1/E [W ].

“For product weight, Jensen's inequality implies E[1/W ] ̸ = 1/E [W ].”

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

Requiring the LLM to emit calculated numerical values within the tool call argument can act as a chain-of-thought scratchpad.

“Second, requiring the LLM to emit calculated numerical values within the tool call argument can act as a chain-of-thought scratchpad.”

May combine two claims.

In July 2026 Google deprecated sampling parameters (e.g., temperature, top-p, and top-k), with the API ignoring these parameters and rejecting them in future releases.

“in July 2026 Google deprecated sampling parameters (e.g., temperature, top-p, and top-k), with the API ignoring these parameters and rejecting them in future releases (Google, 2026).”

• cites Google, 2026Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

List price (D list_price ) are 63 continuous values spanning $0.92 to $53.84 (M = $11.87).

“List price (D list_price ) are 63 continuous values spanning $0.92 to $53.84 (M = $11.87).”

Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

In our formulation, the exchange rate between non-monetary physical attributes and monetary search penalties is derived from the economics of unit-price minimization.

“In our formulation, this exchange rate is derived from the economics of unit-price minimization.”

May combine two claims.

The whole-dollar price and the list price are revealed at every assigned state, so their priors never bind and the benchmark is insensitive to those two domains.

“The whole-dollar price and the list price are revealed at every assigned state, so their priors never bind and the benchmark is insensitive to those two domains.”

Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

Values in Table W39 are comparable within a row but not across rows: where weight is withheld, the entry is multiplied by E[1/W ] = 0.400, and where weight is revealed it is divided by the observed weight, so the two sets of rows are on different scales.

“Values are comparable within a row but not across rows: where weight is withheld, the entry is multiplied by E[1/W ] = 0.400, and where weight is revealed it is divided by the observed weight, so the two sets of rows are on different scales.”