The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Antibacterial Silver
Open accessAbstract
The antibacterial activity of silver has long been known and has found a variety of applications because its toxicity to human cells is considerably lower than to bacteria. The most widely documented uses are prophylactic treatment of burns and water disinfection. However, the mechanisms by which silver kills cells are not known. Information on resistance mechanisms is apparently contradictory and even the chemistry of Ag+ in such systems is poorly understood. Silver binds to many cellular components, with membrane components probably being more important than nucleic acids. It is difficult to know whether strong binding reflects toxicity or detoxification: some sensitive bacterial strains have been reported as accumulating more silver than the corresponding resistant strain, in others the reverse apparently occurs. In several cases resistance has been shown to be plasmid mediated. The plasmids are reported as difficult to transfer, and can also be difficult to maintain, as we too have found. Attempts to find biochemical differences between resistant and sensitive strains have met with limited success: differences are subtle, such as increased cell surface hydrophobicity in a resistant Escherichia coli. Some of the problems are due to defining conditions in which resistance can be observed. Silver(I) has been shown to bind to components of cell culture media, and the presence of chloride is necessary to demonstrate resistance. The form of silver used must also be considered. This is usually water soluble AgNO 3, which readily precipitates as AgCl. The clinically preferred compound is the highly insoluble silver sulfadiazine, which does not cause hypochloraemia in burns. It has been suggested that resistant bacteria are those unable to bind Ag+ more tightly than does chloride. It may be that certain forms of insoluble silver are taken up by cells, as has been found for nickel. Under our experimental conditions, silver complexed by certain ligands is more cytotoxic than AgNO 3, yet with related ligands is considerably less toxic. There is evidently a subtle interplay of solubility and stability which should reward further investigation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics
(2014) · doi:10.1201/b17118 · Cited by 57,706
Comprehensive Coordination Chemistry
Eaborn, C. (1988) · Journal of Organometallic Chemistry · doi:10.1016/0022-328x(88)83103-6 · Cited by 7,163
Principles and practice of disinfection, preservation, and sterilization
Russell, A. D., Hugo, W. B., & Ayliffe, G. A. J. (1992) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 467
Principles and Practice of Disinfection, Preservation and Sterilization
Cooke, E. M. (1983) · Journal of Clinical Pathology · doi:10.1136/jcp.36.3.364-b · Cited by 286
Cited by
Bacterial silver resistance: molecular biology and uses and misuses of silver compounds
Silver, S. (2003) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0168-6445(03)00047-0 · Cited by 1,312
Mode of Bactericidal Action of Silver Zeolite and Its Comparison with That of Silver Nitrate
Matsumura, Y., Yoshikata, K., Kunisaki, S.-I., & Tsuchido, T. (2003) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.69.7.4278-4281.2003 · Cited by 1,048
Understanding biomaterial-tissue interface quality: combined in vitro evaluation
Gasik, M. (2017) · Science and Technology of Advanced Materials · doi:10.1080/14686996.2017.1348872 · Cited by 55
Metadata
- Authors
- Clement, J. L., & Jarrett, P. S.
- Venue
- Metal-Based Drugs
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994-01
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 5-6
- Pages
- 467-482
- ISSN
- 0793-0291 (ISSN-L)
- 1687-5486
- OpenAlex
- W4244681179
- Cited by
- 452
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 0.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antibacterial Silver. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1155/mbd.1994.467
- The paper
- Clement, J. L., & Jarrett, P. S. (1994). Antibacterial Silver. Metal-Based Drugs. https://doi.org/10.1155/mbd.1994.467
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.