A new vision for the national institutes of health
Open accessAbstract
This article has no abstract.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Individual scientists frequently need informatics and multidisciplinary team expertise that is hard to obtain or develop in an independent research setting.
“individual scientists often require informatics and other multidisciplinary team expertise that cannot easily be obtained or developed in the independent research environment.(1)”
From Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support (2009) · cites this paper as [1]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Harris, P. A., Taylor, R., Thielke, R., Payne, J., Gonzalez, N., & Conde, J. G. (2009) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010 · Cited by 51,384 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zerhouni, E. A.
- Affiliations
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Corresponding author
- Zerhouni, Elias A.
- ORCID
- Zerhouni, Elias A.
- Venue
- BioMed Research International
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 2003
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 159-160
- ISSN
- 1110-7243 (ISSN-L)
- 2314-6133
- 2314-6141
- PMC
- PMC400215
- OpenAlex
- W2131485750
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2021: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- BioMed Research International (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health and Medical Research Impacts
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Research, Science, and Academia
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Science, Research, and Medicine
- Keywords
- National Institutes of Health, NIH reorganization, biomedical research policy, federal research funding
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
