The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Tutorial on Text-Independent Speaker Verification
Open accessAbstract
This paper presents an overview of a state-of-the-art text-independent speaker verification system. First, an introduction proposes a modular scheme of the training and test phases of a speaker verification system. Then, the most commonly speech parameterization used in speaker verification, namely, cepstral analysis, is detailed. Gaussian mixture modeling, which is the speaker modeling technique used in most systems, is then explained. A few speaker modeling alternatives, namely, neural networks and support vector machines, are mentioned. Normalization of scores is then explained, as this is a very important step to deal with real-world data. The evaluation of a speaker verification system is then detailed, and the detection error trade-off (DET) curve is explained. Several extensions of speaker verification are then enumerated, including speaker tracking and segmentation by speakers. Then, some applications of speaker verification are proposed, including on-site applications, remote applications, applications relative to structuring audio information, and games. Issues concerning the forensic area are then recalled, as we believe it is very important to inform people about the actual performance and limitations of speaker verification systems. This paper concludes by giving a few research trends in speaker verification for the next couple of years.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data Via the EM Algorithm
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x · Cited by 50,444
The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory
Vapnik, V. N. (1995) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2440-0 · Cited by 39,138
Cited by
An overview of text-independent speaker recognition: From features to supervectors
Kinnunen, T., & Li, H. (2010) · Speech Communication · doi:10.1016/j.specom.2009.08.009 · Cited by 1,434
Generalized End-to-End Loss for Speaker Verification
Wan, L., Wang, Q., Papir, A., & Moreno, I. L. (2018) · 2018 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) · doi:10.1109/icassp.2018.8462665 · Cited by 820
Speaker Recognition by Machines and Humans: A tutorial review
Hansen, J. H. L., & Hasan, T. (2015) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2015.2462851 · Cited by 621
Spoofing and countermeasures for speaker verification: A survey
Wu, Z., Evans, N., Kinnunen, T., Yamagishi, J., Alegre, F., & Li, H. (2015) · Speech Communication · doi:10.1016/j.specom.2014.10.005 · Cited by 601
You Are How You Touch: User Verification on Smartphones via Tapping Behaviors
Zheng, N., Bai, K., Huang, H., & Wang, H. (2014) · 2014 IEEE 22nd International Conference on Network Protocols · doi:10.1109/icnp.2014.43 · Cited by 290
Metadata
- Authors
- Bimbot, F., Bonastre, J.-F., Fredouille, C., Gravier, G., Magrin-Chagnolleau, I., Meignier, S., Merlin, T., Ortega-García, J., Petrovska-Delacrétaz, D., & Reynolds, D. A.
- Venue
- EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing
- Published
- 2004-04-21
- Volume
- 2004
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 1110-8657 (ISSN-L)
- 1687-6180
- OpenAlex
- W2121750345
- Cited by
- 798
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 25.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Tutorial on Text-Independent Speaker Verification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1155/s1110865704310024
- The paper
- Bimbot, F., Bonastre, J.-F., Fredouille, C., Gravier, G., Magrin-Chagnolleau, I., Meignier, S., Merlin, T., Ortega-García, J., Petrovska-Delacrétaz, D., & Reynolds, D. A. (2004). A Tutorial on Text-Independent Speaker Verification. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing. https://doi.org/10.1155/s1110865704310024
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.