The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Three Biomarkers Identified from Serum Proteomic Analysis for the Detection of Early Stage Ovarian Cancer
Abstract
Early detection remains the most promising approach to improve long-term survival of patients with ovarian cancer. In a five-center case-control study, serum proteomic expressions were analyzed on 153 patients with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer, 42 with other ovarian cancers, 166 with benign pelvic masses, and 142 healthy women. Data from patients with early stage ovarian cancer and healthy women at two centers were analyzed independently and the results cross-validated to discover potential biomarkers. The results were validated using the samples from two of the remaining centers. After protein identification, biomarkers for which an immunoassay was available were tested on samples from the fifth center, which included 41 healthy women, 41 patients with ovarian cancer, and 20 each with breast, colon, and prostate cancers. Three biomarkers were identified as follows: (a) apolipoprotein A1 (down-regulated in cancer); (b) a truncated form of transthyretin (down-regulated); and (c) a cleavage fragment of inter-α-trypsin inhibitor heavy chain H4 (up-regulated). In independent validation to detect early stage invasive epithelial ovarian cancer from healthy controls, the sensitivity of a multivariate model combining the three biomarkers and CA125 [74% (95% CI, 52–90%)] was higher than that of CA125 alone [65% (95% CI, 43–84%)] at a matched specificity of 97% (95% CI, 89–100%). When compared at a fixed sensitivity of 83% (95% CI, 61–95%), the specificity of the model [94% (95% CI, 85–98%)] was significantly better than that of CA125 alone [52% (95% CI, 39–65%)]. These biomarkers demonstrated the potential to improve the detection of early stage ovarian cancer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wu, Y. (1999) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1999.10485951 · Cited by 27,221
Coussens, L. M., & Werb, Z. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01322 · Cited by 15,111
A Gene-Expression Signature as a Predictor of Survival in Breast Cancer
van de Vijver, M. J., He, Y. D., van 't Veer, L. J., Dai, H., Hart, A. A. M., Voskuil, D. W., Schreiber, G. J., Peterse, J. L., Roberts, C., Marton, M. J., et al. (2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa021967 · Cited by 6,488
Basic principles of ROC analysis
Metz, C. E. (1978) · Seminars in Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0001-2998(78)80014-2 · Cited by 6,026
Rosenwald, A., Wright, G., Chan, W. C., Connors, J. M., Campo, E., Fisher, R. I., Gascoyne, R. D., Muller-Hermelink, H. K., Smeland, E. B., Giltnane, J. M., et al. (2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa012914 · Cited by 3,829
Use of proteomic patterns in serum to identify ovarian cancer
Petricoin, E. F., Ardekani, A. M., Hitt, B. A., Levine, P. J., Fusaro, V. A., Steinberg, S. M., Mills, G. B., Simone, C., Fishman, D. A., Kohn, E. C., et al. (2002) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(02)07746-2 · Cited by 3,236
Jemal, A., Thomas, A., Murray, T., & Thun, M. (2002) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/canjclin.52.1.23 · Cited by 2,917
The CA 125 tumour-associated antigen: a review of the literature
Jacobs, I., & Bast, R. C. (1989) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136832 · Cited by 955
Self-citationLi, J., Zhang, Z., Rosenzweig, J., Wang, Y. Y., & Chan, D. W. (2002) · Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1093/clinchem/48.8.1296 · Cited by 893
Self-citationSerum Proteomic Patterns for Detection of Prostate Cancer
Petricoin, E. F. (2002) · CancerSpectrum Knowledge Environment · doi:10.1093/jnci/94.20.1576 · Cited by 736
Cited by
Artificial intelligence in healthcare
Yu, K.-H., Beam, A. L., & Kohane, I. S. (2018) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-018-0305-z · Cited by 2,817
Revisiting biomarker discovery by plasma proteomics
Geyer, P. E., Holdt, L. M., Teupser, D., & Mann, M. (2017) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.15252/msb.20156297 · Cited by 917
Precision diagnostics: moving towards protein biomarker signatures of clinical utility in cancer
Borrebaeck, C. A. K. (2017) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc.2016.153 · Cited by 435
Early Detection of Ovarian Cancer
Badgwell, D., & Bast, R. C. (2007) · Disease Markers · doi:10.1155/2007/309382 · Cited by 294
Self-citationLessons from Controversy: Ovarian Cancer Screening and Serum Proteomics
Ransohoff, D. F. (2005) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/dji054 · Cited by 264
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, Z., Bast, R. C., Yu, Y., Li, J., Sokoll, L. J., Rai, A. J., Rosenzweig, J. M., Cameron, B., Wang, Y. Y., Meng, X.-Y., Berchuck, A., van Haaften-Day, C., Hacker, N. F., de Bruijn, H. W. A., van der Zee, A. G. J., Jacobs, I. J., Fung, E. T., & Chan, D. W.
- Venue
- Cancer Research
- Published
- 2004-08-15
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 5882-5890
- ISSN
- 0008-5472 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-7445
- OpenAlex
- W2138482047
- Cited by
- 934
- References
- 40
- FWCI
- 86.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Three Biomarkers Identified from Serum Proteomic Analysis for the Detection of Early Stage Ovarian Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1158/0008-5472.can-04-0746
- The paper
- Zhang, Z., Bast, R. C., Yu, Y., Li, J., Sokoll, L. J., Rai, A. J., Rosenzweig, J. M., Cameron, B., Wang, Y. Y., Meng, X.-Y., Berchuck, A., van Haaften-Day, C., Hacker, N. F., de Bruijn, H. W. A., van der Zee, A. G. J., Jacobs, I. J., Fung, E. T., & Chan, D. W. (2004). Three Biomarkers Identified from Serum Proteomic Analysis for the Detection of Early Stage Ovarian Cancer. Cancer Research. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-04-0746
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.