The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Proteomics and Bioinformatics Approaches for Identification of Serum Biomarkers to Detect Breast Cancer
Open accessAbstract
Background: Surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization (SELDI) is an affinity-based mass spectrometric method in which proteins of interest are selectively adsorbed to a chemically modified surface on a biochip, whereas impurities are removed by washing with buffer. This technology allows sensitive and high-throughput protein profiling of complex biological specimens. Methods: We screened for potential tumor biomarkers in 169 serum samples, including samples from a cancer group of 103 breast cancer patients at different clinical stages [stage 0 (n = 4), stage I (n = 38), stage II (n = 37), and stage III (n = 24)], from a control group of 41 healthy women, and from 25 patients with benign breast diseases. Diluted serum samples were applied to immobilized metal affinity capture Ciphergen ProteinChip® Arrays previously activated with Ni2+. Proteins bound to the chelated metal were analyzed on a ProteinChip Reader Model PBS II. Complex protein profiles of different diagnostic groups were compared and analyzed using the ProPeak software package. Results: A panel of three biomarkers was selected based on their collective contribution to the optimal separation between stage 0–I breast cancer patients and noncancer controls. The same separation was observed using independent test data from stage II–III breast cancer patients. Bootstrap cross-validation demonstrated that a sensitivity of 93% for all cancer patients and a specificity of 91% for all controls were achieved by a composite index derived by multivariate logistic regression using the three selected biomarkers. Conclusions: Proteomics approaches such as SELDI mass spectrometry, in conjunction with bioinformatics tools, could greatly facilitate the discovery of new and better biomarkers. The high sensitivity and specificity achieved by the combined use of the selected biomarkers show great potential for the early detection of breast cancer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wu, Y. (1999) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1999.10485951 · Cited by 27,221
Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. (1986) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/ss/1177013815 · Cited by 6,033
Laser desorption ionization of proteins with molecular masses exceeding 10,000 daltons
Karas, M., & Hillenkamp, F. (1988) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac00171a028 · Cited by 5,637
Use of proteomic patterns in serum to identify ovarian cancer
Petricoin, E. F., Ardekani, A. M., Hitt, B. A., Levine, P. J., Fusaro, V. A., Steinberg, S. M., Mills, G. B., Simone, C., Fishman, D. A., Kohn, E. C., et al. (2002) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(02)07746-2 · Cited by 3,236
Jemal, A., Thomas, A., Murray, T., & Thun, M. (2002) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/canjclin.52.1.23 · Cited by 2,917
Recent advancements in surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization-time of flight-mass spectrometry
Merchant, M., & Weinberger, S. R. (2000) · Electrophoresis · doi:10.1002/(sici)1522-2683(20000401)21:6<1164::aid-elps1164>3.0.co;2-0 · Cited by 693
New desorption strategies for the mass spectrometric analysis of macromolecules
Hutchens, T. W., & Yip, T. (1993) · Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry · doi:10.1002/rcm.1290070703 · Cited by 621
Vlahou, A., Schellhammer, P. F., Mendrinos, S., Patel, K., Kondylis, F. I., Gong, L., Nasim, S., & Wright Jr., G. L. (2001) · The American Journal of Pathology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9440(10)64100-4 · Cited by 409
Paweletz, C. P., Trock, B., Pennanen, M., Tsangaris, T., Magnant, C., Liotta, L. A., & Petricoin, E. F. (2001) · Disease Markers · doi:10.1155/2001/674959 · Cited by 285
Jr, G. W., Cazares, L., Leung, S., Nasim, S., Adam, B., Yip, T., Schellhammer, P., Gong, L., & Vlahou, A. (1999) · Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases · doi:10.1038/sj.pcan.4500384 · Cited by 260
Cited by
Preinvasive and invasive ductal pancreatic cancer and its early detection in the mouse
Hingorani, S. R., Petricoin, E. F., Maitra, A., Rajapakse, V., King, C., Jacobetz, M. A., Ross, S., Conrads, T. P., Veenstra, T. D., Hitt, B. A., et al. (2003) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/s1535-6108(03)00309-x · Cited by 2,471
Comparing protein abundance and mRNA expression levels on a genomic scale
Greenbaum, D. (2003) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2003-4-9-117 · Cited by 1,692
Zhang, Z., Bast, R. C., Yu, Y., Li, J., Sokoll, L. J., Rai, A. J., Rosenzweig, J. M., Cameron, B., Wang, Y. Y., Meng, X.-Y., et al. (2004) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-04-0746 · Cited by 934
Self-citationStrategies for discovering novel cancer biomarkers through utilization of emerging technologies
Kulasingam, V., & Diamandis, E. P. (2008) · Nature Clinical Practice Oncology · doi:10.1038/ncponc1187 · Cited by 771
Progress and Challenges in Screening for Early Detection of Ovarian Cancer
Jacobs, I. J., & Menon, U. (2004) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.r400006-mcp200 · Cited by 458
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, J., Zhang, Z., Rosenzweig, J., Wang, Y. Y., & Chan, D. W.
- Venue
- Clinical Chemistry
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-08-01
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1296-1304
- ISSN
- 0009-9147 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-8561
- OpenAlex
- W2119908867
- Cited by
- 893
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 46.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Proteomics and Bioinformatics Approaches for Identification of Serum Biomarkers to Detect Breast Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/clinchem/48.8.1296
- The paper
- Li, J., Zhang, Z., Rosenzweig, J., Wang, Y. Y., & Chan, D. W. (2002). Proteomics and Bioinformatics Approaches for Identification of Serum Biomarkers to Detect Breast Cancer. Clinical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/48.8.1296
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.