Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 414

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pathology of Genetically Engineered Mouse Models of Pancreatic Exocrine Cancer: Consensus Report and Recommendations

Hruban, Ralph H., Adsay, N. Volkan, Albores-Saavedra, Jorge, Anver, Miriam R., Biankin, Andrew V., Boivin, Gregory P., Furth, Emma E., Furukawa, Toru, Klein, Alison, Klimstra, David S., Klőppel, Gűnter, Lauwers, Gregory Y., Longnecker, Daniel S., Lűttges, Jutta, Maitra, Anirban, Offerhaus, G. Johan A., Pérez-Gallego, Lucía, Redston, Mark, Tuveson, David A.·2006·Cancer Research

Abstract

Several diverse genetically engineered mouse models of pancreatic exocrine neoplasia have been developed. These mouse models have a spectrum of pathologic changes; however, until now, there has been no uniform nomenclature to characterize these changes. An international workshop, sponsored by The National Cancer Institute and the University of Pennsylvania, was held from December 1 to 3, 2004 with the goal of establishing an internationally accepted uniform nomenclature for the pathology of genetically engineered mouse models of pancreatic exocrine neoplasia. The pancreatic pathology in 12 existing mouse models of pancreatic neoplasia was reviewed at this workshop, and a standardized nomenclature with definitions and associated images was developed. It is our intention that this nomenclature will standardize the reporting of genetically engineered mouse models of pancreatic exocrine neoplasia, that it will facilitate comparisons between genetically engineered mouse models and human pancreatic disease, and that it will be broad enough to accommodate newly emerging mouse models of pancreatic neoplasia. (Cancer Res 2006; 66(1): 95-106)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/0008-5472.can-05-2168

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 42 references

Cited by

See all 414

Metadata

Authors
Hruban, R. H., Adsay, N. V., Albores-Saavedra, J., Anver, M. R., Biankin, A. V., Boivin, G. P., Furth, E. E., Furukawa, T., Klein, A., Klimstra, D. S., Klőppel, G., Lauwers, G. Y., Longnecker, D. S., Lűttges, J., Maitra, A., Offerhaus, G. J. A., Pérez-Gallego, L., Redston, M., & Tuveson, D. A.
Venue
Cancer Research
Published
2006-01-01
Volume
66
Issue
1
Pages
95-106
ISSN
  • 0008-5472 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-7445
OpenAlex
W2154953378
Cited by
414
References
42
FWCI
12.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pathology of Genetically Engineered Mouse Models of Pancreatic Exocrine Cancer: Consensus Report and Recommendations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1158/0008-5472.can-05-2168
The paper
Hruban, R. H., Adsay, N. V., Albores-Saavedra, J., Anver, M. R., Biankin, A. V., Boivin, G. P., Furth, E. E., Furukawa, T., Klein, A., Klimstra, D. S., Klőppel, G., Lauwers, G. Y., Longnecker, D. S., Lűttges, J., Maitra, A., Offerhaus, G. J. A., Pérez-Gallego, L., Redston, M., & Tuveson, D. A. (2006). Pathology of Genetically Engineered Mouse Models of Pancreatic Exocrine Cancer: Consensus Report and Recommendations. Cancer Research. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-05-2168

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.