Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 228

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Immunologic and Clinical Responses after Vaccinations with Peptide-Pulsed Dendritic Cells in Metastatic Renal Cancer Patients

Wierecky, Jan, Müller, Martin R., Wirths, Stefan, Halder-Oehler, Edith, Dörfel, Daniela, Schmidt, Susanne M., Häntschel, Maik, Brugger, Wolfram, Schröder, Stephen, Horger, Marius S., Kanz, Lothar, Brossart, Peter·2006·Cancer Research

Abstract

A phase I trial was conducted to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a dendritic cell–based vaccination in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Autologous mature dendritic cells derived from peripheral blood monocytes were pulsed with the HLA-A2-binding MUC1 peptides (M1.1 and M1.2). For the activation of CD4+ T-helper lymphocytes, dendritic cells were further incubated with the PAN-DR-binding peptide PADRE. Dendritic cell vaccinations were done s.c. every 2 weeks for four times and repeated monthly until tumor progression. After five dendritic cell injections, patients additionally received three injections weekly of low-dose interleukin-2 (1 million IE/m2). The induction of vaccine-induced T-cell responses was monitored using enzyme-linked immunospot and Cr release assays. Twenty patients were included. The treatment was well tolerated with no severe side effects. In six patients, regression of the metastatic sites was induced after vaccinations with three patients achieving an objective response (one complete response, two partial responses, two mixed responses, and one stable disease). Additional four patients were stable during the treatment for up to 14 months. MUC1 peptide–specific T-cell responses in vivo were detected in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells of the six patients with objective responses. Interestingly, in patients responding to the treatment, T-cell responses to antigens not used for vaccinations, such as adipophilin, telomerase, or oncofetal antigen, could be detected, indicating that epitope spreading might occur. This study shows that MUC1 peptide–pulsed dendritic cells can induce clinical and immunologic responses in patients with metastatic RCC. (Cancer Res 2006; 66(11): 5910-8)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/0008-5472.can-05-3905

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 228

Metadata

Authors
Wierecky, J., Müller, M. R., Wirths, S., Halder-Oehler, E., Dörfel, D., Schmidt, S. M., Häntschel, M., Brugger, W., Schröder, S., Horger, M. S., Kanz, L., & Brossart, P.
Venue
Cancer Research
Published
2006-06-01
Volume
66
Issue
11
Pages
5910-5918
ISSN
  • 0008-5472 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-7445
OpenAlex
W2155312231
Cited by
228
References
2
FWCI
8.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Immunologic and Clinical Responses after Vaccinations with Peptide-Pulsed Dendritic Cells in Metastatic Renal Cancer Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1158/0008-5472.can-05-3905
The paper
Wierecky, J., Müller, M. R., Wirths, S., Halder-Oehler, E., Dörfel, D., Schmidt, S. M., Häntschel, M., Brugger, W., Schröder, S., Horger, M. S., Kanz, L., & Brossart, P. (2006). Immunologic and Clinical Responses after Vaccinations with Peptide-Pulsed Dendritic Cells in Metastatic Renal Cancer Patients. Cancer Research. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-05-3905

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.