Activation of Hepatic Stem Cell Marker EpCAM by Wnt–β-Catenin Signaling in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Abstract
The heterogeneous nature of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and the lack of appropriate biomarkers have hampered patient prognosis and treatment stratification. Using a gene expression profiling approach, we recently identified a novel prognostic HCC subtype that resembles hepatic progenitor cells with the activation of stem cell markers and Wnt-beta-catenin signaling, based on EpCAM (epithelial cell adhesion molecule, a hepatic stem cell marker) expression. In this study, we investigated whether the activation of the Wnt-beta-catenin pathway regulates EpCAM expression. We found that nuclear accumulation of beta-catenin induced, whereas the degradation of beta-catenin or inhibition of Tcf/beta-catenin complex formation reduced EpCAM gene expression in cultured normal human hepatocytes and HCC cell lines. We identified two Tcf binding elements in the EpCAM promoter that specifically bound to Tcf-4 in an electrophoretic mobility shift assay. EpCAM promoter luciferase activity was down-regulated by the degradation of beta-catenin or inhibition of Tcf/beta-catenin complex formation. Furthermore, we found that EpCAM-positive HCC is much more sensitive to Tcf/beta-catenin binding inhibitors than EpCAM-negative HCC in vitro. Taken together, our data indicate that EpCAM is a Wnt-beta-catenin signaling target gene and may be used to facilitate HCC prognosis by enabling effective stratification of patients with predicted pharmacologic responses to Wnt-beta-catenin signaling antagonists.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Wnt-signaling was reportedly activated in a hepatic stem-cell-like HCC class showing a close correlation with EpCAM expression and induction of known Wnt-target-genes BAMBI and DKK1.
“Wnt-signaling was also reportedly activated in a hepatic stem-cell-like HCC class showing a close correlation with EpCAM expression and induction of known Wnt-target-genes BAMBI and DKK1(9, 10).”
From Wnt-Pathway Activation in Two Molecular Classes of Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Experimental Modulation by Sorafenib (2012) · cites this paper as [10]
Cites
Lynch, T. J., Bell, D. W., Sordella, R., Gurubhagavatula, S., Okimoto, R. A., Brannigan, B. W., Harris, P. L., Haserlat, S. M., Supko, J. G., Haluska, F. G., et al. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa040938 · Cited by 11,486 · see citing works
<i>EGFR</i> Mutations in Lung Cancer: Correlation with Clinical Response to Gefitinib Therapy
Paez, J. G., Jänne, P. A., Lee, J. C., Tracy, S., Greulich, H., Gabriel, S., Herman, P., Kaye, F. J., Lindeman, N., Boggon, T. J., et al. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1099314 · Cited by 9,368 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Emerging Role of EpCAM in Cancer and Stem Cell Signaling
Munz, M., Baeuerle, P. A., & Gires, O. (2009) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-09-0654 · Cited by 515 · see citing works
Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in carcinogenesis and cancer therapy
Song, P., Gao, Z., Bao, Y., Chen, L., Huang, Y., Liu, Y., Dong, Q., & Wei, X. (2024) · Journal of Hematology & Oncology · doi:10.1186/s13045-024-01563-4 · Cited by 382 · see citing works
Lachenmayer, A., Alsinet, C., Savic, R., Cabellos, L., Toffanin, S., Hoshida, Y., Villanueva, A., Minguez, B., Newell, P., Tsai, H.-W., et al. (2012) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-11-2322 · Cited by 306 · see citing works
Potential hepatic stem cells reside in EpCAM+ cells of normal and injured mouse liver
Okabe, M., Tsukahara, Y., Tanaka, M., Suzuki, K., Saito, S., Kamiya, Y., Tsujimura, T., Nakamura, K., & Miyajima, A. (2009) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.031369 · Cited by 287 · see citing works
Li, B., Cao, Y., Meng, G., Qian, L., Xu, T., Yan, C., Luo, O., Wang, S., Wei, J., Ding, Y., et al. (2019) · EBioMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.11.063 · Cited by 245 · see citing works
- Authors
- Yamashita, T., Budhu, A., Forgues, M., & Wang, X. W.
- Affiliations
- National Cancer Institute (US)
- Venue
- Cancer Research
- Published
- 2007-11-15
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 10831-10839
- ISSN
- 0008-5472 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-7445
- OpenAlex
- W2141369960
- Cited by
- 446
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 7.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Cancer Institute
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
- Keywords
- hepatocellular carcinoma, EpCAM, Wnt/β-catenin signaling, hepatic stem cells, hepatic progenitor cells, TCF4, β-catenin nuclear accumulation, prognostic factors, patient stratification, Wnt signaling antagonist, drug sensitivity
- MeSH terms
- Epithelial Cell Adhesion Molecule, Antigens, Neoplasm, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, Humans, Liver, Liver Neoplasms, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Stem Cells, Signal Transduction, Cell Adhesion Molecules, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Gene Expression Profiling, Hepatocytes, Cell Line, Tumor, Cell Proliferation, Wnt Proteins, beta Catenin
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review