The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A New Model for Prediction of Drug Distribution in Tumor and Normal Tissues: Pharmacokinetics of Temozolomide in Glioma Patients
Open accessAbstract
Difficulties in direct measurement of drug concentrations in human tissues have hampered the understanding of drug accumulation in tumors and normal tissues. We propose a new system analysis modeling approach to characterize drug distribution in tissues based on human positron emission tomography (PET) data. The PET system analysis method was applied to temozolomide, an important alkylating agent used in the treatment of brain tumors, as part of standard temozolomide treatment regimens in patients. The system analysis technique, embodied in the convolution integral, generated an impulse response function that, when convolved with temozolomide plasma concentration input functions, yielded predicted normal brain and brain tumor temozolomide concentration profiles for different temozolomide dosing regimens (75–200 mg/m2/d). Predicted peak concentrations of temozolomide ranged from 2.9 to 6.7 μg/mL in human glioma tumors and from 1.8 to 3.7 μg/mL in normal brain, with the total drug exposure, as indicated by the tissue/plasma area under the curve ratio, being about 1.3 in tumor compared with 0.9 in normal brain. The higher temozolomide exposures in brain tumor relative to normal brain were attributed to breakdown of the blood-brain barrier and possibly secondary to increased intratumoral angiogenesis. Overall, the method is considered a robust tool to analyze and predict tissue drug concentrations to help select the most rational dosing schedules. [Cancer Res 2009;69(1):120–7]
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Solving Least Squares Problems
Lawson, C. L., & Hanson, R. J. (1995) · doi:10.1137/1.9781611971217 · Cited by 7,103
Cited by
Challenges to curing primary brain tumours
Aldape, K., Brindle, K. M., Chesler, L., Chopra, R., Gajjar, A., Gilbert, M. R., Gottardo, N., Gutmann, D. H., Hargrave, D., Holland, E. C., et al. (2019) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41571-019-0177-5 · Cited by 959
Auffinger, B., Tobias, A. L., Han, Y., Lee, G., Guo, D., Dey, M., Lesniak, M. S., & Ahmed, A. U. (2014) · Cell Death & Differentiation · doi:10.1038/cdd.2014.31 · Cited by 349
Temozolomide and Other Alkylating Agents in Glioblastoma Therapy
Strobel, H., Baisch, T., Fitzel, R., Schilberg, K., Siegelin, M. D., Karpel-Massler, G., Debatin, K.-M., & Westhoff, M.-A. (2019) · Biomedicines · doi:10.3390/biomedicines7030069 · Cited by 279
Nance, E., Zhang, C., Shih, T.-Y., Xu, Q., Schuster, B. S., & Hanes, J. (2014) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn504210g · Cited by 262
Portnow, J., Badie, B., Chen, M., Liu, A., Blanchard, S., & Synold, T. W. (2009) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-09-1349 · Cited by 255
Metadata
- Authors
- Rosso, L., Brock, C. S., Gallo, J. M., Saleem, A., Price, P. M., Turkheimer, F. E., & Aboagye, E. O.
- Venue
- Cancer Research
- Published
- 2008-12-31
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 120-127
- ISSN
- 0008-5472 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-7445
- OpenAlex
- W1986655234
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A New Model for Prediction of Drug Distribution in Tumor and Normal Tissues: Pharmacokinetics of Temozolomide in Glioma Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1158/0008-5472.can-08-2356
- The paper
- Rosso, L., Brock, C. S., Gallo, J. M., Saleem, A., Price, P. M., Turkheimer, F. E., & Aboagye, E. O. (2009). A New Model for Prediction of Drug Distribution in Tumor and Normal Tissues: Pharmacokinetics of Temozolomide in Glioma Patients. Cancer Research. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-08-2356
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.