Cited by 959Glioma Diagnosis and TreatmentBrain Metastases and TreatmentCancer Cells and Metastasis

Challenges to curing primary brain tumours

Open access
Aldape, Kenneth, Brindle, Kevin M., Chesler, Louis, Chopra, Rajesh, Gajjar, Amar, Gilbert, Mark R., Gottardo, Nicholas, Gutmann, David H. +18 more·2019·Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Despite decades of research, brain tumours remain among the deadliest of all forms of cancer. The ability of these tumours to resist almost all conventional and novel treatments relates, in part, to the unique cell-intrinsic and microenvironmental properties of neural tissues. In an attempt to encourage progress in our understanding and ability to successfully treat patients with brain tumours, Cancer Research UK convened an international panel of clinicians and laboratory-based scientists to identify challenges that must be overcome if we are to cure all patients with a brain tumour. The seven key challenges summarized in this Position Paper are intended to serve as foci for future research and investment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41571-019-0177-5

Cites

92 of 92 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aldape, K., Brindle, K. M., Chesler, L., Chopra, R., Gajjar, A., Gilbert, M. R., Gottardo, N., Gutmann, D. H., Hargrave, D., Holland, E. C., Jones, D. T. W., Joyce, J. A., Kearns, P., Kieran, M. W., Mellinghoff, I. K., Merchant, M., Pfister, S. M., Pollard, S. M., Ramaswamy, V., Rich, J. N., Robinson, G. W., Rowitch, D. H., Sampson, J. H., Taylor, M. D., Workman, P., & Gilbertson, R. J.
Affiliations
  • University Health Network (CA)
  • Cancer Research UK (GB)
  • Institute of Cancer Research (GB)
  • St. Jude Children's Research Hospital (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • The Kids Research Institute Australia (AU)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • Great Ormond Street Hospital (GB)
  • Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US)
  • National Center for Tumor Diseases (DE)
  • Ludwig Cancer Research (CH)
  • Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (GB)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
  • AstraZeneca (United States) (US)
  • Edinburgh Cancer Research (GB)
  • Hospital for Sick Children (CA)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • Wellcome/MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute (GB)
  • Duke Cancer Institute (US)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Gilbertson, Richard J.
Venue
Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
Published
2019-02-07
Volume
16
Issue
8
Pages
509-520
ISSN
  • 1759-4774 (ISSN-L)
  • 1759-4782
OpenAlex
W2913928134
Cited by
959
References
92
Citations by year
2026: 80 · 2025: 149 · 2024: 155 · 2023: 161 · 2022: 131 · 2021: 161 · 2020: 100 · 2019: 22
FWCI
12.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Digital Commons@Becker (Washington University School of Medicine) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo (cc-by)
Funders
  • Cancer Research UK (22492, 28667, 26398, 21992, C197/A28667, 17242, 22897, R0CA1129541, 28028, P01CA96832, 28289, 27413, 15958, 17368)
  • Brain Tumour Charity (16/193, GN-000358)
  • National Institutes of Health (R0CA1129541, Z99 CA999999, P01CA96832)
  • Medical Research Council (MC_PC_12009)
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA116659, R35CA197718, R01CA129958, P30CA008748, P01CA096832, P30CA014236)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (K02NS047409, R01NS089272)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Brain Metastases and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Cells and Metastasis
Keywords
primary brain tumors, treatment resistance, tumor microenvironment, nervous tissue
MeSH terms
Brain Neoplasms, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review