Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 222

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Feasibility Study of Particle-Assisted Laser Ablation of Brain Tumors in Orthotopic Canine Model

Schwartz, Jon A., Shetty, Anil M., Price, Roger E., Stafford, R. Jason, Wang, James C., Uthamanthil, Rajesh K., Pham, Kevin, McNichols, Roger J., Coleman, Chris L., Payne, J. Donald·2009·Cancer Research

Abstract

We report on a pilot study showing a proof of concept for the passive delivery of nanoshells to an orthotopic tumor where they induce a local, confined therapeutic response distinct from that of normal brain resulting in the photothermal ablation of canine transmissible venereal tumor (cTVT) in a canine brain model. cTVT fragments grown in severe combined immunodeficient mice were successfully inoculated in the parietal lobe of immunosuppressed, mixed-breed hound dogs. A single dose of near-IR (NIR)–absorbing, 150-nm nanoshells was infused i.v. and allowed time to passively accumulate in the intracranial tumors, which served as a proxy for an orthotopic brain metastasis. The nanoshells accumulated within the intracranial cTVT, suggesting that its neovasculature represented an interruption of the normal blood-brain barrier. Tumors were thermally ablated by percutaneous, optical fiber–delivered, NIR radiation using a 3.5-W average, 3-minute laser dose at 808 nm that selectively elevated the temperature of tumor tissue to 65.8 ± 4.1°C. Identical laser doses applied to normal white and gray matter on the contralateral side of the brain yielded sublethal temperatures of 48.6 ± 1.1°C. The laser dose was designed to minimize thermal damage to normal brain tissue in the absence of nanoshells and compensate for variability in the accumulation of nanoshells in tumor. Postmortem histopathology of treated brain sections showed the effectiveness and selectivity of the nanoshell-assisted thermal ablation. [Cancer Res 2009;69(4):1659–67]

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/0008-5472.can-08-2535

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 222

Metadata

Authors
Schwartz, J. A., Shetty, A. M., Price, R. E., Stafford, R. J., Wang, J. C., Uthamanthil, R. K., Pham, K., McNichols, R. J., Coleman, C. L., & Payne, J. D.
Venue
Cancer Research
Published
2009-02-12
Volume
69
Issue
4
Pages
1659-1667
ISSN
  • 0008-5472 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-7445
OpenAlex
W1988592914
Cited by
222
References
3
FWCI
10.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Feasibility Study of Particle-Assisted Laser Ablation of Brain Tumors in Orthotopic Canine Model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1158/0008-5472.can-08-2535
The paper
Schwartz, J. A., Shetty, A. M., Price, R. E., Stafford, R. J., Wang, J. C., Uthamanthil, R. K., Pham, K., McNichols, R. J., Coleman, C. L., & Payne, J. D. (2009). Feasibility Study of Particle-Assisted Laser Ablation of Brain Tumors in Orthotopic Canine Model. Cancer Research. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-08-2535

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.