Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 184

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Noncationic Peptides Obtained From Azurin Preferentially Enter Cancer Cells

Taylor, Brad N., Mehta, Rajeshwari R., Yamada, Tohru, Lekmine, Fatima, Christov, Konstantin, Chakrabarty, Ananda M., Green, Albert, Bratescu, Laura, Shilkaitis, Anne, Beattie, Craig W., Das Gupta, Tapas K.·2009·Cancer Research

Abstract

Azurin, a member of the cupredoxin family of copper containing redox proteins, preferentially penetrates human cancer cells and exerts cytostatic and cytotoxic (apoptotic) effects with no apparent activity on normal cells. Amino acids 50 to 77 (p28) of azurin seem responsible for cellular penetration and at least part of the antiproliferative, proapoptotic activity of azurin against a number of solid tumor cell lines. We show by confocal microscopy and fluorescence-activated cell sorting that amino acids 50 to 67 (p18) are a minimal motif (protein transduction domain) responsible for the preferential entry of azurin into human cancer cells. A combination of inhibitors that interfere with discrete steps of the endocytotic process and antibodies for caveolae and Golgi-mediated transport revealed that these amphipathic, α-helical peptides are unique. Unlike the cationic cell-penetrating peptides, α-helical antennapedia-like, or VP22 type peptides, p18 and p28 are not bound by cell membrane glycosaminoglycans and preferentially penetrate cancer cells via endocytotic, caveosome-directed, and caveosome-independent pathways. Once internalized, p28, but not p18, inhibits cancer cell proliferation initially through a cytostatic mechanism. These observations suggest the azurin fragments, p18 and p28, account for the preferential entry of azurin into human cancer cells and a significant amount of the antiproliferative activity of azurin on human cancer cells, respectively. [Cancer Res 2009;69(2):537–46]

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/0008-5472.can-08-2932

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 184

Metadata

Authors
Taylor, B. N., Mehta, R. R., Yamada, T., Lekmine, F., Christov, K., Chakrabarty, A. M., Green, A., Bratescu, L., Shilkaitis, A., Beattie, C. W., & Das Gupta, T. K.
Venue
Cancer Research
Published
2009-01-15
Volume
69
Issue
2
Pages
537-546
ISSN
  • 0008-5472 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-7445
OpenAlex
W2127582578
Cited by
184
References
2
FWCI
3.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Noncationic Peptides Obtained From Azurin Preferentially Enter Cancer Cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1158/0008-5472.can-08-2932
The paper
Taylor, B. N., Mehta, R. R., Yamada, T., Lekmine, F., Christov, K., Chakrabarty, A. M., Green, A., Bratescu, L., Shilkaitis, A., Beattie, C. W., & Das Gupta, T. K. (2009). Noncationic Peptides Obtained From Azurin Preferentially Enter Cancer Cells. Cancer Research. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-08-2932

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.