Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 210

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Treatment-Dependent Androgen Receptor Mutations in Prostate Cancer Exploit Multiple Mechanisms to Evade Therapy

Open access
Steinkamp, Mara P., O'Mahony, Orla A., Brogley, Michele, Rehman, Haniya, LaPensee, Elizabeth W., Dhanasekaran, Saravana, Hofer, Matthias D., Kuefer, Rainer, Chinnaiyan, Arul, Rubin, Mark A., Pienta, Kenneth J., Robins, Diane M.·2009·Cancer Research

Abstract

Mutations in the androgen receptor (AR) that enable activation by antiandrogens occur in hormone-refractory prostate cancer, suggesting that mutant ARs are selected by treatment. To validate this hypothesis, we compared AR variants in metastases obtained by rapid autopsy of patients treated with flutamide or bicalutamide, or by excision of lymph node metastases from hormone-naïve patients. AR mutations occurred at low levels in all specimens, reflecting genetic heterogeneity of prostate cancer. Base changes recurring in multiple samples or multiple times per sample were considered putative selected mutations. Of 26 recurring missense mutations, most in the NH2-terminal domain (NTD) occurred in multiple tumors, whereas those in the ligand binding domain (LBD) were case specific. Hormone-naïve tumors had few recurring mutations and none in the LBD. Several AR variants were assessed for mechanisms that might underlie treatment resistance. Selection was evident for the promiscuous receptor AR-V716M, which dominated three metastases from one flutamide-treated patient. For the inactive cytoplasmically restricted splice variant AR23, coexpression with AR enhanced ligand response, supporting a decoy function. A novel NTD mutation, W435L, in a motif involved in intramolecular interaction influenced promoter-selective, cell-dependent transactivation. AR-E255K, mutated in a domain that interacts with an E3 ubiquitin ligase, led to increased protein stability and nuclear localization in the absence of ligand. Thus, treatment with antiandrogens selects for gain-of-function AR mutations with altered stability, promoter preference, or ligand specificity. These processes reveal multiple targets for effective therapies regardless of AR mutation. [Cancer Res 2009;69(10):4434–42]

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/0008-5472.can-08-3605

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 210

Metadata

Authors
Steinkamp, M. P., O'Mahony, O. A., Brogley, M., Rehman, H., LaPensee, E. W., Dhanasekaran, S., Hofer, M. D., Kuefer, R., Chinnaiyan, A., Rubin, M. A., Pienta, K. J., & Robins, D. M.
Venue
Cancer Research
Published
2009-05-15
Volume
69
Issue
10
Pages
4434-4442
ISSN
  • 0008-5472 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-7445
OpenAlex
W2037852023
Cited by
210
References
2
FWCI
15.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Treatment-Dependent Androgen Receptor Mutations in Prostate Cancer Exploit Multiple Mechanisms to Evade Therapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1158/0008-5472.can-08-3605
The paper
Steinkamp, M. P., O'Mahony, O. A., Brogley, M., Rehman, H., LaPensee, E. W., Dhanasekaran, S., Hofer, M. D., Kuefer, R., Chinnaiyan, A., Rubin, M. A., Pienta, K. J., & Robins, D. M. (2009). Treatment-Dependent Androgen Receptor Mutations in Prostate Cancer Exploit Multiple Mechanisms to Evade Therapy. Cancer Research. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-08-3605

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.