Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 186

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Acquired TNFRSF14 Mutations in Follicular Lymphoma Are Associated with Worse Prognosis

Cheung, K-John J., Johnson, Nathalie A., Affleck, Joslynn G., Severson, Tesa, Steidl, Christian, Ben-Neriah, Susana, Schein, Jacqueline, Morin, Ryan D., Moore, Richard, Shah, Sohrab P., Qian, Hong, Paul, Jessica E., Telenius, Adele, Relander, Thomas, Lam, Wan, Savage, Kerry, Connors, Joseph M., Brown, Carolyn, Marra, Marco A., Gascoyne, Randy D., Horsman, Douglas E.·2010·Cancer Research

Abstract

Clinical correlative studies have linked 1p36 deletions with worse prognosis in follicular lymphoma (FL). In this study, we sought to identify the critical gene(s) in this region that is responsible for conferring inferior prognosis. BAC array technology applied to 141 FL specimens detected a minimum region of deletion (MRD) of ∼97 kb within 1p36.32 in 20% of these cases. Frequent single-nucleotide polymorphism–detected copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity was also found in this region. Analysis of promoter CpGs in the MRD did not reveal differential patterns of DNA methylation in samples that differed in 1p36 status. Exon sequencing of MRD genes identified somatic alterations in the TNFRSF14 gene in 3 of 11 selected cases with matching normal DNA. An expanded cohort consisting of 251 specimens identified 46 cases (18.3%) with nonsynonymous mutations affecting TNFRSF14. Overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were associated with the presence of TNFRSF14 mutation in patients whose overall treatment included rituximab. We further showed that inferior OS and DSS were most pronounced in patients whose lymphomas contained both TNFRSF14 mutations and 1p36 deletions after adjustment for the International Prognostic Index [hazard ratios of 3.65 (95% confidence interval, 1.35–9.878, P = 0.011) and 3.19 (95% confidence interval, 1.06–9.57, P = 0.039), respectively]. Our findings identify TNFRSF14 as a candidate gene associated with a subset of FL, based on frequent occurrence of acquired mutations and their correlation with inferior clinical outcomes. Cancer Res; 70(22); 9166–74. ©2010 AACR.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/0008-5472.can-10-2460

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 186

Metadata

Authors
Cheung, K.-J. J., Johnson, N. A., Affleck, J. G., Severson, T., Steidl, C., Ben-Neriah, S., Schein, J., Morin, R. D., Moore, R., Shah, S. P., Qian, H., Paul, J. E., Telenius, A., Relander, T., Lam, W., Savage, K., Connors, J. M., Brown, C., Marra, M. A., Gascoyne, R. D., & Horsman, D. E.
Venue
Cancer Research
Published
2010-11-14
Volume
70
Issue
22
Pages
9166-9174
ISSN
  • 0008-5472 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-7445
OpenAlex
W2119410505
Cited by
186
References
0
FWCI
7.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Acquired TNFRSF14 Mutations in Follicular Lymphoma Are Associated with Worse Prognosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1158/0008-5472.can-10-2460
The paper
Cheung, K.-J. J., Johnson, N. A., Affleck, J. G., Severson, T., Steidl, C., Ben-Neriah, S., Schein, J., Morin, R. D., Moore, R., Shah, S. P., Qian, H., Paul, J. E., Telenius, A., Relander, T., Lam, W., Savage, K., Connors, J. M., Brown, C., Marra, M. A., . . . Horsman, D. E. (2010). Acquired TNFRSF14 Mutations in Follicular Lymphoma Are Associated with Worse Prognosis. Cancer Research. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-10-2460

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.