Cited by 432Cancer Cells and MetastasisAnimal testing and alternativesScience, Research, and Medicine

Cancer Cell Lines for Drug Discovery and Development

Wilding, Jennifer L., Bodmer, Walter F.·2014·Cancer Research

Abstract

Despite the millions of dollars spent on target validation and drug optimization in preclinical models, most therapies still fail in phase III clinical trials. Our current model systems, or the way we interpret data from them, clearly do not have sufficient clinical predictive power. Current opinion suggests that this is because the cell lines and xenografts that are commonly used are inadequate models that do not effectively mimic and predict human responses. This has become such a widespread belief that it approaches dogma in the field of drug discovery and optimization and has spurred a surge in studies devoted to the development of more sophisticated animal models such as orthotopic patient-derived xenografts in an attempt to obtain more accurate estimates of whether particular cancers will respond to given treatments. Here, we explore the evidence that has led to the move away from the use of in vitro cell lines and toward various forms of xenograft models for drug screening and development. We review some of the pros and cons of each model and give an overview of ways in which the use of cell lines could be modified to improve the predictive capacity of this well-defined model. Cancer Res; 74(9); 2377–84. ©2014 AACR.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/0008-5472.can-13-2971

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Since cell lines accumulate culture-related changes over many passages, methods were created to grow osteosarcoma tumours as primary cultures and as patient-derived xenograft libraries.

    “Established cell cultures have been the predominant research models of osteosarcoma for decades, but the culture-related alterations that cell lines acquire over tens and sometimes hundreds of passages 220,221 led to the development of systems for propagating osteosarcoma tumours 220,221 by creating libraries of primary tumour cell cultures and patient-derived xenografts (PDXs).”

    From Osteosarcoma (2022) · cites this paper as [221]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wilding, J. L., & Bodmer, W. F.
Affiliations
John Radcliffe Hospital (GB)
Venue
Cancer Research
Published
2014-04-30
Volume
74
Issue
9
Pages
2377-2384
ISSN
  • 0008-5472 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-7445
OpenAlex
W2130072062
Cited by
432
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 8
FWCI
3.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Cells and Metastasis
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Science, Research, and Medicine
Keywords
cancer cell lines, xenograft models, drug screening, prediction model, drug development, preclinical models, translational oncology
MeSH terms
Animals, Antineoplastic Agents, Drug Screening Assays, Antitumor, Humans, Neoplasms, Cell Line, Tumor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review