Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 345

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Akt Inhibition Enhances Expansion of Potent Tumor-Specific Lymphocytes with Memory Cell Characteristics

Open access
Crompton, Joseph G., Sukumar, Madhusudhanan, Roychoudhuri, Rahul, Clever, David, Gros, Alena, Eil, Robert L., Tran, Eric, Hanada, Ken-ichi, Yu, Zhiya, Palmer, Douglas C., Kerkar, Sid P., Michalek, Ryan D., Upham, Trevor, Leonardi, Anthony, Acquavella, Nicolas, Wang, Ena, Marincola, Francesco M., Gattinoni, Luca, Muranski, Pawel, Sundrud, Mark S., Klebanoff, Christopher A., Rosenberg, Steven A., Fearon, Douglas T., Restifo, Nicholas P.·2015·Cancer Research

Abstract

Adoptive cell therapy (ACT) using autologous tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) results in complete regression of advanced cancer in some patients, but the efficacy of this potentially curative therapy may be limited by poor persistence of TIL after adoptive transfer. Pharmacologic inhibition of the serine/threonine kinase Akt has recently been shown to promote immunologic memory in virus-specific murine models, but whether this approach enhances features of memory (e.g., long-term persistence) in TIL that are characteristically exhausted and senescent is not established. Here, we show that pharmacologic inhibition of Akt enables expansion of TIL with the transcriptional, metabolic, and functional properties characteristic of memory T cells. Consequently, Akt inhibition results in enhanced persistence of TIL after adoptive transfer into an immunodeficient animal model and augments antitumor immunity of CD8 T cells in a mouse model of cell-based immunotherapy. Pharmacologic inhibition of Akt represents a novel immunometabolomic approach to enhance the persistence of antitumor T cells and improve the efficacy of cell-based immunotherapy for metastatic cancer. Cancer Res; 75(2); 296–305. ©2014 AACR.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/0008-5472.can-14-2277

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Cited by

See all 345

Metadata

Authors
Crompton, J. G., Sukumar, M., Roychoudhuri, R., Clever, D., Gros, A., Eil, R. L., Tran, E., Hanada, K.-I., Yu, Z., Palmer, D. C., Kerkar, S. P., Michalek, R. D., Upham, T., Leonardi, A., Acquavella, N., Wang, E., Marincola, F. M., Gattinoni, L., Muranski, P., Sundrud, M. S., Klebanoff, C. A., Rosenberg, S. A., Fearon, D. T., & Restifo, N. P.
Venue
Cancer Research
Published
2015-01-14
Volume
75
Issue
2
Pages
296-305
ISSN
  • 0008-5472 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-7445
OpenAlex
W2096270448
Cited by
345
References
9
FWCI
9.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Akt Inhibition Enhances Expansion of Potent Tumor-Specific Lymphocytes with Memory Cell Characteristics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1158/0008-5472.can-14-2277
The paper
Crompton, J. G., Sukumar, M., Roychoudhuri, R., Clever, D., Gros, A., Eil, R. L., Tran, E., Hanada, K.-I., Yu, Z., Palmer, D. C., Kerkar, S. P., Michalek, R. D., Upham, T., Leonardi, A., Acquavella, N., Wang, E., Marincola, F. M., Gattinoni, L., Muranski, P., . . . Restifo, N. P. (2015). Akt Inhibition Enhances Expansion of Potent Tumor-Specific Lymphocytes with Memory Cell Characteristics. Cancer Research. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-14-2277

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.