Cited by 7Genomics and Rare DiseasesCancer Genomics and DiagnosticsBRCA gene mutations in cancer

An Active Learning Framework Improves Tumor Variant Interpretation

Open access
Blee, Alexandra M., Li, Bian, Pecen, Turner, Meiler, Jens, Nagel, Zachary D., Capra, John A., Chazin, Walter J.·2022·Cancer Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

For precision medicine to reach its full potential for treatment of cancer and other diseases, protein variant effect prediction tools are needed to characterize variants of unknown significance (VUS) in a patient's genome with respect to their likelihood to influence treatment response and outcomes. However, the performance of most variant prediction tools is limited by the difficulty of acquiring sufficient training and validation data. To overcome these limitations, we applied an iterative active learning approach starting from available biochemical, evolutionary, and functional annotations. With active learning, VUS that are most challenging to classify by an initial machine learning model are functionally evaluated and then reincorporated with the phenotype information in subsequent iterations of algorithm training. The potential of active learning to improve variant interpretation was first demonstrated by applying it to synthetic and deep mutational scanning datasets for four cancer-relevant proteins. The utility of the approach to guide interpretation and functional validation of tumor VUS was then probed on the nucleotide excision repair (NER) protein xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group A (XPA), a potential biomarker for cancer therapy sensitivity. A quantitative high-throughput cell-based NER activity assay was used to validate XPA VUS selected by the active learning strategy. In all cases, active learning yielded a significant improvement in variant effect predictions over traditional learning. These analyses suggest that active learning is well suited to significantly improve interpretation of VUS and cancer patient genomes. Significance: A novel machine learning approach predicts the impact of tumor mutations on cellular phenotypes, overcomes limited training data, minimizes costly functional validation, and advances efforts to implement cancer precision medicine.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/0008-5472.can-21-3798

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Blee, A. M., Li, B., Pecen, T., Meiler, J., Nagel, Z. D., Capra, J. A., & Chazin, W. J.
Affiliations
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
  • Capra, John A.
  • Chazin, Walter J.
Venue
Cancer Research
Published
2022-06-10
Volume
82
Issue
15
Pages
2704-2715
ISSN
  • 0008-5472 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-7445
OpenAlex
W4282925187
Cited by
7
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2
FWCI
0.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • NIH (R01 CA218315, P01 CA092584, R01 LM013434, T32 CA009582, F32 CA250258, U01HG007674, U01HG010215–03S1, S10 RR031634)
  • American Heart Association (20POST35220002)
  • Humboldt Professorship of the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
  • Vanderbilt Advanced Computing Center for Research and Education
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Keywords
active learning (machine learning), variants of uncertain significance, precision medicine, XPA, nucleotide excision repair, deep mutational scanning, functional validation, limited training data
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Humans, Mutation, Neoplasms, Precision Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review