Effects of a 2-year randomized soy intervention on sex hormone levels in premenopausal women
Abstract
Objective: Several epidemiologic studies have described protective effects of soy consumption against breast cancer. The goal of this trial among premenopausal women was to examine the effect of soy foods on menstrual cycle length and circulating sex hormone levels. Methods: This 2-year dietary intervention randomized 220 healthy premenopausal women. The intervention group consumed two daily servings of soy foods containing ∼50 mg of isoflavones; the control group maintained their regular diet. Five blood samples (obtained in months 0, 3, 6, 12, and 24) were taken 5 days after ovulation as determined by an ovulation kit. The serum samples were analyzed for estrone, estradiol, sex hormone binding globulin, androstenedione, and progesterone by immunoassay. Results: At baseline, both groups had similar demographic, anthropometric, and nutritional characteristics. The dropout rates of 15.6% (17 of 109) in the intervention group and 12.6% (14 of 111) in the control group did not differ significantly. According to soy intake logs, 24-hour recalls, and urinary isoflavone excretion, the women closely adhered to the study regimen. Menstrual cycles became slightly shorter in both groups but did not differ by group. Mixed general linear models indicated no significant intervention effect on any of the serum hormones. However, androstenedione and progesterone decreased significantly over time in both groups. Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that the preventive effects of soy on breast cancer risk in premenopausal women may not be mediated by circulating sex hormone levels. Different mechanisms of actions or effects of exposure earlier in life are alternate hypotheses that require further investigation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Among all studies, there was report of only one case of breast cancer recurrence that occurred in a soy-allocated subject; and two new cases of breast cancer and one case of endometrial cancer among soy allocated subjects compared to five in control subjects.
“Amongst all the studies, there was report of only one case of breast cancer recurrence that occurred in a soy-allocated subject [142]; and two new cases of breast cancer and one case of endometrial cancer among soy allocated subjects compared to five in the control subjects [132,145,147,160].”
From Soy, Red Clover, and Isoflavones and Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review (2013) · cites this paper as [145]
A total of 18 RCTs assessed circulating estrogen levels; 15 of 18 found no significant impact from soy compared to control.
“A total of 18 RCTs assessed circulating estrogens levels (E1, E2, and/ or E3) Fifteen of 18 studies found no significant impact from soy compared to the control group (p>0.05) [129,132,133,138,140,143,145,147,149,150,155,156,158,160,163].”
From Soy, Red Clover, and Isoflavones and Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review (2013) · cites this paper as [145]
Cites
Soya foods and breast cancer risk: A prospective study in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan
Key, T. J., Sharp, G. B., Appleby, P. N., Beral, V, Goodman, M. T., Soda, M., & Mabuchi, K. (1999) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6690837 · Cited by 262 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Epidemiology of soy exposures and breast cancer risk
Wu, A. H., Yu, M. C., Tseng, C.-C., & Pike, M. C. (2008) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6604145 · Cited by 418 · see citing works
Soy, Red Clover, and Isoflavones and Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review
Fritz, H., Seely, D., Flower, G., Skidmore, B., Fernandes, R., Vadeboncoeur, S., Kennedy, D., Cooley, K., Wong, R., Sagar, S., et al. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0081968 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Inflammatory markers in a 2-year soy intervention among premenopausal women
Maskarinec, G., Sofias, J. S., Franke, A. A., & Cooney, R. V. (2009) · Journal of Inflammation · doi:10.1186/1476-9255-6-9 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Maskarinec, G., Franke, A. A., Williams, A. E., Hebshi, S., Oshiro, C., Murphy, S., & Stanczyk, F. Z.
- Affiliations
- Cancer Center of Hawaii (US)
- University of Southern California (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
- Published
- 2004-11-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1736-1744
- ISSN
- 1055-9965 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2142297484
- Cited by
- 92
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 5.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Cancer Institute (R01CA080843)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Phytoestrogen effects and research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
- Keywords
- soy products, isoflavones, premenopausal women, sex hormones, breast cancer prevention, menstrual cycle length, estradiol, estrone, sex hormone-binding globulin, androstenedione, progesterone, dietary intervention
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Breast Neoplasms, Diet, Female, Humans, Isoflavones, Menstrual Cycle, Middle Aged, Gonadal Steroid Hormones, Premenopause, Soybean Proteins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review