Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 195

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evaluation of Osteopontin as Biomarker for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Koopmann, Jens, Fedarko, Neal S., Jain, Alka, Maitra, Anirban, Iacobuzio-Donahue, Christine, Rahman, Ayman, Hruban, Ralph H., Yeo, Charles J., Goggins, Michael·2004·Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention

Abstract

Objective: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is a deadly disease with an overall 5-year patient survival of less than 5%. This dismal prognosis of pancreatic cancer is largely due to the advanced stage of the disease at presentation. If pancreatic cancer could be diagnosed more readily and accurately using serum markers, patient survival could theoretically be improved by enabling more patients to avail of surgical resection. One candidate tumor marker recently identified by global gene expression analysis of pancreatic cancer is the secreted glycophosphoprotein osteopontin (OPN). In this study, we evaluate OPN as a serum marker of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Methods: In situ hybridization for OPN was performed on a pancreatic adenocarcinoma tissue microarray. Serum OPN levels were determined in preoperative sera from 50 patients with pancreatic cancer and 22 healthy control individuals by competitive ELISA. Results: In situ hybridization for OPN performed on a tissue microarray revealed strong OPN mRNA signal in tumor-infiltrating macrophages in 8 of 14 pancreatic adenocarcinomas. In contrast, OPN expression was not seen in the pancreatic cancer cells themselves, nor was it seen in normal pancreatic tissue or in the macrophages distant from the infiltrating cancer. Serum OPN levels, as measured by ELISA, were elevated in the sera of 50 patients with resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma compared to 22 healthy control individuals (mean ± SD for OPN was 482 ± 170 ng/ml and 204 ± 65 ng/ml, respectively; P < 0.001). Using a cutoff level of 2 SD above the mean for healthy individuals, elevated OPN had sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 97% for pancreatic cancer. In contrast, only 62% of these patients with resectable pancreatic cancer had elevated CA19-9. Conclusion: Serum OPN may have utility as a diagnostic marker in patients with pancreatic cancer.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/1055-9965.487.13.3

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 195

Metadata

Authors
Koopmann, J., Fedarko, N. S., Jain, A., Maitra, A., Iacobuzio-Donahue, C., Rahman, A., Hruban, R. H., Yeo, C. J., & Goggins, M.
Venue
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
Published
2004-03-01
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
487-491
ISSN
  • 1055-9965 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-7755
OpenAlex
W1879822879
Cited by
195
References
1
FWCI
7.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of Osteopontin as Biomarker for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1158/1055-9965.487.13.3
The paper
Koopmann, J., Fedarko, N. S., Jain, A., Maitra, A., Iacobuzio-Donahue, C., Rahman, A., Hruban, R. H., Yeo, C. J., & Goggins, M. (2004). Evaluation of Osteopontin as Biomarker for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.487.13.3

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.