The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measurement and Meaning of Oxidatively Modified DNA Lesions in Urine
Open accessAbstract
Background: Oxidatively generated damage to DNA has been implicated in the pathogenesis of a wide variety of diseases. The noninvasive assessment of such damage, i.e., in urine, and application to large-scale human studies are vital to understanding this role and devising intervention strategies. Methods: We have reviewed the literature to establish the status quo with regard to the methods and meaning of measuring DNA oxidation products in urine. Results: Most of the literature focus upon 8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2′-deoxyguanosine (8-oxodG), and whereas a large number of these reports concern clinical conditions, there remains (a) lack of consensus between methods, (b) possible contribution from diet and/or cell death, (c) no definitive DNA repair source of urinary 2′-deoxyribonucleoside lesions, and (d) no reference ranges for healthy or diseased individuals. Conclusions: The origin of 8-oxodG is not identified; however, recent cell culture studies suggest that the action of Nudix hydrolase(s) on oxidative modification of the nucleotide pool is a likely candidate for the 8-oxodG found in urine and, potentially, of other oxidized 2′-deoxyribonucleoside lesions. Literature reports suggest that diet and cell death have minimal, if any, influence upon urinary levels of 8-oxodG and 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine, although this should be assessed on a lesion-by-lesion basis. Broadly speaking, there is consensus between chromatographic techniques; however, ELISA approaches continue to overestimate 8-oxodG levels and is not sufficiently specific for accurate quantification. With increasing numbers of lesions being studied, it is vital that these fundamental issues are addressed. We report the formation of the European Standards Committee on Urinary (DNA) Lesion Analysis whose primary goal is to achieve consensus between methods and establish reference ranges in health and disease. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008;17(1):3–14)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Instability and decay of the primary structure of DNA
Lindahl, T. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/362709a0 · Cited by 5,679
Molecular Mechanisms of Mammalian DNA Repair and the DNA Damage Checkpoints
Sancar, A., Lindsey-Boltz, L. A., Ünsal-Kaçmaz, K., & Linn, S. (2004) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.73.011303.073723 · Cited by 3,317
Oxidative DNA damage: mechanisms, mutation, and disease
Cooke, M. S., Evans, M. D., Dizdaroglu, M., & Lunec, J. (2003) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fj.02-0752rev · Cited by 3,245
Self-citationThe Comet Assay for DNA Damage and Repair: Principles, Applications, and Limitations
Collins, A. R. (2004) · Molecular Biotechnology · doi:10.1385/mb:26:3:249 · Cited by 2,892
Oxidative DNA damage and disease: induction, repair and significance
Evans, M. D., Dizdaroglu, M., & Cooke, M. S. (2004) · Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research · doi:10.1016/j.mrrev.2003.11.001 · Cited by 1,372 · cited 2×
“The DNA N-glycosylases responsible for removing modified bases are increasingly well defined (93) and have been discussed thoroughly elsewhere (2).”
BackgroundSelf-citationSevere oxidatively damaged DNA after cisplatin treatment of cancer patients
Siomek, A., Tujakowski, J., Gackowski, D., Rozalski, R., Foksinski, M., Dziaman, T., Roszkowski, K., & Olinski, R. (2006) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.22088 · Cited by 67 · cited 1×
“As yet, the most decisive argument against the contribution of cell death to urinary levels of 8-oxodG and 8-oxoGua comes from a recently published report from the Olinski group (92).”
Background
Cited by
DNA Base Damage by Reactive Oxygen Species, Oxidizing Agents, and UV Radiation
Cadet, J., & Wagner, J. R. (2013) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a012559 · Cited by 903
Measurement and Clinical Significance of Biomarkers of Oxidative Stress in Humans
Marrocco, I., Altieri, F., & Peluso, I. (2017) · Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity · doi:10.1155/2017/6501046 · Cited by 855
Oxidative Stress and Its Significant Roles in Neurodegenerative Diseases and Cancer
Thanan, R., Oikawa, S., Hiraku, Y., Ohnishi, S., Ma, N., Pinlaor, S., Yongvanit, P., Kawanishi, S., & Murata, M. (2014) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms16010193 · Cited by 455
Kell, D. B. (2010) · Archives of Toxicology · doi:10.1007/s00204-010-0577-x · Cited by 361
Oxidatively Generated Damage to Cellular DNA by UVB and UVA Radiation ,
Cadet, J., Douki, T., & Ravanat, J. (2015) · Photochemistry and Photobiology · doi:10.1111/php.12368 · Cited by 355
Metadata
- Authors
- Cooke, M. S., Olinski, R., Loft, S., & members of the European Standards Committee on Urinary (DNA) Lesion Analysis (ESCULA)
- Venue
- Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
- Published
- 2008-01-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-14
- ISSN
- 1055-9965 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2123252099
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 7.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measurement and Meaning of Oxidatively Modified DNA Lesions in Urine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1158/1055-9965.epi-07-0751
- The paper
- Cooke, M. S., Olinski, R., Loft, S., & members of the European Standards Committee on Urinary (DNA) Lesion Analysis (ESCULA). (2008). Measurement and Meaning of Oxidatively Modified DNA Lesions in Urine. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.epi-07-0751
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.