Systematic Review and Meta-study Synthesis of Qualitative Studies Evaluating Facilitators and Barriers to Participation in Colorectal Cancer Screening
Published version of a preprint
Abstract
Screening reduces the incidence, morbidity, and mortality of colorectal cancer, yet participation tends to be low. We undertook a systematic review and meta-study synthesis of qualitative studies to identify facilitators and barriers to colorectal cancer screening participation. We searched major bibliographic databases for records published in all languages from inception to February 2015. Included primary studies that elicited views and perceptions towards colorectal cancer screening were appraised for relevance and quality. We used a two-stage synthesis to create an interpretation of colorectal cancer screening decisions grounded in primary studies; a thematic analysis to group themes and systematically compare studies and a meta-synthesis to generate an expanded theory of colorectal cancer screening participation. Ninety-four studies were included. The decision to participate in colorectal cancer screening depended on an individual's awareness of colorectal cancer screening. Awareness affected views of cancer, attitudes towards colorectal cancer screening modalities, and motivation for screening. Factors mediating awareness included public education to address misconceptions, primary care physician efforts to recommend screening, and the influence of friends and family. Specific barriers to participation in populations with lower participation rates included language barriers, logistical challenges to attending screening tests, and cultural beliefs. This study identifies key barriers, facilitators, and mediators to colorectal cancer screening participation. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 25(6); 907–17. ©2016 AACR.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In a Dutch study, 12% of non-attenders had sufficient knowledge to make an informed decision.
“whereas 12% of the non-attenders had sufficient knowledge to make an informed decision [9].”
From Improving cancer screening uptake: A behavioural and cultural insights perspective and rapid review (2026) · cites this paper as [9]
The results are mixed about the role of health literacy in different populations and minority groups.
“The results are mixed about the role of health literacy in different populations and minority groups [9].”
From Improving cancer screening uptake: A behavioural and cultural insights perspective and rapid review (2026) · cites this paper as [9]
For CRC, lack of awareness of CRC as a disease and lack of knowledge of the role of screening in CRC prevention can be barriers to screening.
“For CRC for example, the lack of awareness of CRC as a disease and lack of knowledge of the role of screening in CRC prevention [9]”
From Improving cancer screening uptake: A behavioural and cultural insights perspective and rapid review (2026) · cites this paper as [9]
Motivation is positively associated with screening attendance.
“Motivation has been positively associated with screening attendance [9,14,17,18].”
From Improving cancer screening uptake: A behavioural and cultural insights perspective and rapid review (2026) · cites this paper as [9]
In a Dutch study, 19% of participants who attended screening did not have sufficient knowledge to make an informed choice.
“In a Dutch study 19% of the participants who attended the screening did not have sufficient knowledge to make an informed choice”
From Improving cancer screening uptake: A behavioural and cultural insights perspective and rapid review (2026) · cites this paper as [9]
Fear of treatment is an emotional barrier.
“Emotional barriers include fear of cancer, screening results and treatment [8,9,15] and fatalism [10,24].”
From Improving cancer screening uptake: A behavioural and cultural insights perspective and rapid review (2026) · cites this paper as [9]
Fear of cancer is an emotional barrier.
“Emotional barriers include fear of cancer, screening results and treatment [8,9,15] and fatalism [10,24].”
From Improving cancer screening uptake: A behavioural and cultural insights perspective and rapid review (2026) · cites this paper as [9]
For women, perceiving CRC as a male disease has been a barrier for screening.
“For women, perceiving CRC as a male disease has been a barrier for screening [7,9].”
From Improving cancer screening uptake: A behavioural and cultural insights perspective and rapid review (2026) · cites this paper as [9]
Motivation to stay healthy and have peace of mind is associated with increased screening.
“For example, autonomous motivation [16], i.e., acting out of a sense of willingness as opposed to pressure [19], motivation to stay healthy and have peace of mind, and motivation due to someone close being affected by cancer [9] have been associated with increased screening.”
From Improving cancer screening uptake: A behavioural and cultural insights perspective and rapid review (2026) · cites this paper as [9]
Motivation due to someone close being affected by cancer is associated with increased screening.
“For example, autonomous motivation [16], i.e., acting out of a sense of willingness as opposed to pressure [19], motivation to stay healthy and have peace of mind, and motivation due to someone close being affected by cancer [9] have been associated with increased screening.”
From Improving cancer screening uptake: A behavioural and cultural insights perspective and rapid review (2026) · cites this paper as [9]
Belief that natural remedies thwart cancer is a barrier to CRC screening in ethnic minority and male groups.
“Barriers to CRC screening in ethnic minority and male groups include beliefs that natural remedies thwart cancer, ethnic food protects from cancer, and screening offends masculinity and manhood [9].”
From Improving cancer screening uptake: A behavioural and cultural insights perspective and rapid review (2026) · cites this paper as [9]
Belief that ethnic food protects from cancer is a barrier to CRC screening in ethnic minority and male groups.
“Barriers to CRC screening in ethnic minority and male groups include beliefs that natural remedies thwart cancer, ethnic food protects from cancer, and screening offends masculinity and manhood [9].”
From Improving cancer screening uptake: A behavioural and cultural insights perspective and rapid review (2026) · cites this paper as [9]
Belief that screening offends masculinity and manhood is a barrier to CRC screening in ethnic minority and male groups.
“Barriers to CRC screening in ethnic minority and male groups include beliefs that natural remedies thwart cancer, ethnic food protects from cancer, and screening offends masculinity and manhood [9].”
From Improving cancer screening uptake: A behavioural and cultural insights perspective and rapid review (2026) · cites this paper as [9]
Lack of transportation and difficulties in finding an escort for older adults are accessibility barriers.
“Accessibility barriers include long distances and lack of access to healthcare services [10] as well as lack of transportation and difficulties in finding an escort for older adults [9].”
From Improving cancer screening uptake: A behavioural and cultural insights perspective and rapid review (2026) · cites this paper as [9]
Competing life demands such as other diseases, childcare responsibility, no possibility to take time off, and being busy with housework are widely cited barriers.
“Barriers such as other diseases, responsibility of childcare, no possibility to take time off, and being busy with housework are widely cited [9,13,22,23,30].”
From Improving cancer screening uptake: A behavioural and cultural insights perspective and rapid review (2026) · cites this paper as [9]
Addressing structural and motivational barriers may be essential to raising participation rates as knowledge does not always translate into action.
“Addressing structural and motivational barriers may be essential to raising participation rates as knowledge does not always translate into action [9, 44, 51, 65].”
From Improving cancer screening uptake: A behavioural and cultural insights perspective and rapid review (2026) · cites this paper as [9]
In RCTs, small media has had a modest impact on CRC screening uptake, although not demonstrated in all studies.
“In RCTs, small media has had a modest impact on CRC screening uptake, although not demonstrated in all studies [9].”
From Improving cancer screening uptake: A behavioural and cultural insights perspective and rapid review (2026) · cites this paper as [9]
Awareness raising usually relies on one-way information provision through small media (booklets, videos, letters) and less often mass media.
“Awareness raising usually relies on one-way information provision through small media e.g., booklets, videos, letters [9,38,39], and less often mass media [38].”
From Improving cancer screening uptake: A behavioural and cultural insights perspective and rapid review (2026) · cites this paper as [9]
The influence of mass media on cancer screening is inconsistent and difficult to assess.
“The influence of mass media is inconsistent and difficult to assess [9].”
From Improving cancer screening uptake: A behavioural and cultural insights perspective and rapid review (2026) · cites this paper as [9]
Cites
Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gotzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2700 · Cited by 17,648 · see citing works
The Health Belief Model: a decade later.
Janz, N. K., & Becker, M. H. (1984) · Health Education Quarterly · doi:10.1177/109019818401100101 · Cited by 8,437 · see citing works
Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ
Tong, A., Flemming, K., McInnes, E., Oliver, S., & Craig, J. (2012) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-12-181 · Cited by 3,569 · see citing works
Finding the Findings in Qualitative Studies
Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2002) · Journal of Nursing Scholarship · doi:10.1111/j.1547-5069.2002.00213.x · Cited by 468 · see citing works
What implementation interventions increase cancer screening rates? a systematic review
Brouwers, M. C., De Vito, C., Bahirathan, L., Carol, A., Carroll, J. C., Cotterchio, M., Dobbins, M., Lent, B., Levitt, C., Lewis, N., et al. (2011) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-6-111 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Walters, L. A., Wilczynski, N. L., & Haynes, R. B. (2006) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732305284027 · Cited by 89 · cited 1× · see citing works
“A validated qualitative search strategy filter was used to optimize search results to include qualitative studies.(23-26) Qualitative and mixedmethods studies (with a qualitative component) were considered relevant if they investigated perceptions of participation in CRC screening.”
Method
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dressler, J., Johnsen, A. T., Madsen, L. J., Rasmussen, M., & Jorgensen, L. N. (2021) · Public Health · doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2020.10.025 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Improving cancer screening uptake: A behavioural and cultural insights perspective and rapid review
Palsola, M., Likki, T., Snijders, V., Corbex, M., Lasierra, L., & Curtis, B. (2026) · Glasnik javnog zdravlja · doi:10.5937/serbjph2601086p
- Authors
- Honein-AbouHaidar, G. N., Kastner, M., Vuong, V., Perrier, L., Daly, C., Rabeneck, L., Straus, S., & Baxter, N. N.
- Affiliations
- St. Michael's Hospital (CA)
- Cancer Care Ontario (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Baxter, Nancy N.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
- Published
- 2016-05-31
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 907-917
- ISSN
- 1055-9965 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2340122852
- Cited by
- 295
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 30 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 3
- FWCI
- 1.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Cancer Care Ontario and Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute (700803)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
- Keywords
- colorectal cancer screening, screening uptake, barriers to screening, facilitators of screening, patient awareness, public education, social influence, language barriers, cultural beliefs, screening motivation, attitudes toward screening
- MeSH terms
- Communication Barriers, Decision Making, Female, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Motivation, Patients, Colorectal Neoplasms, Early Detection of Cancer
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review