Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 183

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prognostic Significance of CpG Island Methylator Phenotype and Microsatellite Instability in Gastric Carcinoma

Open access
An, Changhyeok, Choi, In-Seon, Yao, James C., Worah, Samidha, Xie, Keping, Mansfield, Paul F., Ajani, Jaffer A., Rashid, Asif, Hamilton, Stanley R., Wu, Tsung-Teh·2005·Clinical Cancer Research

Abstract

Purpose: The influence of molecular characteristics in prognosis of gastric cancer remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of the CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) and microsatellite instability (MSI) in gastric cancer. Experimental Design: We studied the methylation profiles of tumor suppressor gene p16, DNA mismatch repair gene hMLH1, and four CpG islands (MINT1, MINT2, MINT25, and MINT31) using bisulfite/methylation–specific PCR, and MSI using five microsatellite markers in 83 resected gastric carcinomas. The CIMP and MSI status were compared with clinicopathologic features and overall survival. Results: Concordant methylation of multiple genes/loci (CIMP-high) was present in 31% of tumors and in 4% of non-neoplastic mucosa, CIMP-low in 55% and 17%, and CIMP-negative in 13% and 79%, respectively (P < 0.001). The prevalence of MSI-high, MSI-low, and MS-stable in tumor was 19%, 17%, and 64%, respectively. MSI status was closely associated with hMLH1 hypermethylation and CIMP status (P = 0.001). In univariate analysis, overall survival was predicted by pathologic stage (P < 0.0001), R0 resection (P = 0.0002), MINT31 methylation (P = 0.04), and CIMP-high status (P = 0.04). MSI status of tumor was not a significant predictor of prognosis. Although CIMP status seemed to be a prognostic predictor of gastric cancer, only pathologic stage remained a significant predictor of prognosis on multivariate analysis (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Our results indicate that there is an association between CIMP status and MSI status in gastric cancer. Concordant methylation of multiple genes/loci (CIMP-H) is associated with better survival but is not an independent predictor of prognosis in resected gastric cancer.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/1078-0432.656.11.2

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 183

Metadata

Authors
An, C., Choi, I.-S., Yao, J. C., Worah, S., Xie, K., Mansfield, P. F., Ajani, J. A., Rashid, A., Hamilton, S. R., & Wu, T.-T.
Venue
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2005-01-15
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
656-663
ISSN
  • 1078-0432 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-3265
OpenAlex
W2132327532
Cited by
183
References
1
FWCI
10.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prognostic Significance of CpG Island Methylator Phenotype and Microsatellite Instability in Gastric Carcinoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1158/1078-0432.656.11.2
The paper
An, C., Choi, I.-S., Yao, J. C., Worah, S., Xie, K., Mansfield, P. F., Ajani, J. A., Rashid, A., Hamilton, S. R., & Wu, T.-T. (2005). Prognostic Significance of CpG Island Methylator Phenotype and Microsatellite Instability in Gastric Carcinoma. Clinical Cancer Research. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.656.11.2

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.