Aromatase expression in stromal cells of endometrioid endometrial cancer correlates with poor survival
Abstract
Purpose and Experimental Design: To assess the prognostic significance of intratumoral aromatase in endometrioid endometrial cancer, sections from 55 patients with endometrial cancer were evaluated for expression of aromatase using immunohistochemistry, and the correlation between aromatase expression and clinicopathologic parameters were analyzed. Results: Immunohistochemical staining for aromatase was positive for 32 (58%), 20 (36%), and 19 (34%) patients in cancer epithelial cells, stromal cells, and myometrial cells around the flank invasion, respectively. In situ hybridization also detected aromatase mRNA in all three types of cells. RT-PCR analysis revealed that aromatase mRNA was 2.5 ± 1.0 amol/μg total RNA (mean ± SE; n = 7) in tumor tissue. Western blot analysis detected the expected aromatase protein size of 58 kDa in cancer tissues more abundantly than in cancer-free endometrium (n = 3). The immunoreactivity in stromal cells correlated positively with advanced surgical stage and poor survival. Survival analysis revealed that the immunoreactivity of stromal cells was a significant prognostic factor, independent of histologic grade, muscular invasion, and lymph node metastasis, but dependent on surgical stage. By contrast, the immunoreactivity of aromatase both in cancer epithelial cells and myometrial cells did not correlate with prognosis. Conclusions: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first evidence associating intratumoral aromatase expression in stromal cells and poor survival in endometrioid endometrial cancer. This positive linkage indicates that local expression of aromatase plays a role in tumor progression through the formation of in situ estrogens. In situ expression of aromatase may offer a potential target for management of endometrial cancers.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Expression of aromatase and 17βHSD1 in endometrial cancer has been correlated with poor prognosis.
“Notably, expression of aromatase and 17βHSD 1 in EC have both been correlated with poor prognosis [84,85].”
From Endometrial Intracrinology: Oestrogens, Androgens and Endometrial Disorders (2018) · cites this paper as [85]
Cites
Utsunomiya, H., Suzuki, T., Kaneko, C., Takeyama, J., Nakamura, J., Kimura, K., Yoshihama, M., Harada, N., Ito, K., Konno, R., et al. (2001) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jcem.86.7.7661 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Sluijmer, A. V., Heineman, M. J., Koudstaal, J., Theunissen, P. H. M. H., de Jong, F. H., & Evers, J. L. H. (1998) · Menopause · doi:10.1097/00042192-199805040-00004 · Cited by 37 · cited 1× · see citing works
“It has been noted that androgen secretion is increased from ovaries showing stromal hyperplasia (24, 28, 29), and women with endometrioid endometrial cancer show ovarian stromal hyperplasia more frequently than women without endometrial cancer (28, 30).”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Endometrial Intracrinology: Oestrogens, Androgens and Endometrial Disorders
Gibson, D. A., Simitsidellis, I., Collins, F., & Saunders, P. T. K. (2018) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms19103276 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
“Notably, expression of aromatase and 17βHSD 1 in EC have both been correlated with poor prognosis [84,85].”
BackgroundThe Significance of the Sulfatase Pathway for Local Estrogen Formation in Endometrial Cancer
Sinreih, M., Knific, T., Anko, M., Hevir, N., Vouk, K., Jerin, A., Frković Grazio, S., & Rižner, T. L. (2017) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2017.00368 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Konings, G. F., Cornel, K. M., Xanthoulea, S., Delvoux, B., Skowron, M. A., Kooreman, L., Koskimies, P., Krakstad, C., Salvesen, H. B., van Kuijk, K., et al. (2018) · The Journal of Pathology · doi:10.1002/path.5004 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
- Authors
- Segawa, T., Shozu, M., Murakami, K., Kasai, T., Shinohara, K., Nomura, K., Ohno, S., & Inoue, M.
- Affiliations
- Kanazawa University (JP)
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kanazawa University School of Medicine, Kanazawa, Japan
- Venue
- Clinical Cancer Research
- Published
- 2005-03-15
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2188-2194
- ISSN
- 1078-0432 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-3265
- OpenAlex
- W2153056118
- Cited by
- 52
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5
- FWCI
- 4.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
- Keywords
- aromatase, endometrioid endometrial cancer, tumor stromal cells, prognostic factors, survival, surgical stage, tumor progression, aromatase mRNA expression, myometrial cells
- MeSH terms
- Aromatase, Endometrium, Epithelial Cells, Female, Humans, Lymphatic Metastasis, Middle Aged, Myometrium, Neoplasm Invasiveness, Prognosis, RNA, Messenger, Survival Rate, Stromal Cells, In Situ Hybridization, Carcinoma, Endometrioid, Disease Progression, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review