The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 64 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biobehavioral, Immune, and Health Benefits following Recurrence for Psychological Intervention Participants
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: A clinical trial was designed to test the hypothesis that a psychological intervention could reduce the risk of cancer recurrence. Newly diagnosed regional breast cancer patients (n = 227) were randomized to the intervention-with-assessment or the assessment-only arm. The intervention had positive psychological, social, immune, and health benefits, and after a median of 11 years the intervention arm was found to have reduced the risk of recurrence (hazard ratio, 0.55; P = 0.034). In follow-up, we hypothesized that the intervention arm might also show longer survival after recurrence. If observed, we then would examine potential biobehavioral mechanisms. Experimental Design: All patients were followed; 62 recurred. Survival analyses included all 62. Upon recurrence diagnosis, those available for further biobehavioral study were accrued (n = 41, 23 intervention and 18 assessment). For those 41, psychological, social, adherence, health, and immune (natural killer cell cytotoxicity, T-cell proliferation) data were collected at recurrence diagnosis and 4, 8, and 12 months later. Results: Intent-to-treat analysis revealed reduced risk of death following recurrence for the intervention arm (hazard ratio, 0.41; P = 0.014). Mixed-effects follow-up analyses with biobehavioral data showed that all patients responded with significant psychological distress at recurrence diagnosis, but thereafter only the intervention arm improved (P values < 0.023). Immune indices were significantly higher for the intervention arm at 12 months (P values < 0.017). Conclusions: Hazards analyses augment previous findings in showing improved survival for the intervention arm after recurrence. Follow-up analyses showing biobehavioral advantages for the intervention arm contribute to our understanding of how improved survival was achieved. Clin Cancer Res; 16(12); 3270–8. ©2010 AACR.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“previous research suggests that cancer patients with higher distress or depressive symptoms (Andersen et al., 2010;Antoni et al., 2001;Danhauer et al., 2009), or elevated sleep disturbance (Ratcliff et al., 2016), derive greater benefit from psychosocial or behavioural interventions.”
From The effects of physical activity on cortisol and sleep: A systematic review and meta-analysis. (2022) · cites this paper as Andersen et al., 2010
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regression Models and Life-Tables
Cox, D. R. (1972) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x · Cited by 39,793
Regression Models and Life-Tables
Cox, D. R. (1992) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4380-9_37 · Cited by 26,297
Regression Modeling Strategies
Harrell, F. E. (2001) · Springer series in statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-3462-1 · Cited by 9,270
Cancer: Principles and Practice of Oncology.
(1991) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-114-9-819_4 · Cited by 8,524
Hosmer, D. W., Lemeshow, S. A., & May, S. J. (2008) · Wiley series in probability and statistics · doi:10.1002/9780470258019 · Cited by 3,851
The Handbook of Research Synthesis.
Howel, D., Cooper, H., & Hedges, L. V. (1995) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2533295 · Cited by 3,657
Gill, J. (2005) · Encyclopedia of Social Measurement · doi:10.1016/b0-12-369398-5/00166-3 · Cited by 3,126
Applied Survival Analysis: Regression Modeling of Time-to-Event Data
Hosmer, D. W., Lemeshow, S. A., & May, S. J. (2008) · Cited by 3,030
The clinical evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents in cancer
Karnofsky, D. A. (1949) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,933
McNair, D. M. (1992) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,527
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Andersen, B. L., DeRubeis, R. J., Berman, B. S., Gruman, J., Champion, V. L., Massie, M. J., Holland, J. C., Partridge, A. H., Bak, K., Somerfield, M. R., et al. (2014) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2013.52.4611 · Cited by 735
Self-citationGiese-Davis, J., Collie, K., Rancourt, K. M. S., Neri, E., Kraemer, H. C., & Spiegel, D. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2010.28.4455 · Cited by 458
The impact of psychosocial stress and stress management on immune responses in patients with cancer
Antoni, M. H., & Dhabhar, F. S. (2019) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.31943 · Cited by 419
Depression in cancer: The many biobehavioral pathways driving tumor progression
Bortolato, B., Hyphantis, T. N., Valpione, S., Perini, G., Maes, M. H. J., Morris, G., Kubera, M., Köhler, C. A., Fernandes, B. S., Stubbs, B., et al. (2016) · Cancer Treatment Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2016.11.004 · Cited by 399
Stress and cancer: mechanisms, significance and future directions
Eckerling, A., Ricon-Becker, I., Sorski, L., Sandbank, E., & Ben-Eliyahu, S. (2021) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41568-021-00395-5 · Cited by 348
Metadata
- Authors
- Andersen, B. L., Thornton, L. M., Shapiro, C. L., Farrar, W. B., Mundy, B. L., Yang, H.-C., & Carson, W. E.
- Affiliations
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute (US)
- Authors' Affiliations: 1Department of Psychology, and 2Department of Surgery, 3Comprehensive Cancer Center and the Solove Research Institute, and 4Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
- Corresponding author
- Andersen, Barbara L.
- Venue
- Clinical Cancer Research
- Published
- 2010-06-14
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3270-3278
- ISSN
- 1078-0432 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-3265
- PMC
- PMC2910547
- OpenAlex
- W2161805825
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 64
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 4.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Clinical Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH51487, R01MH051487)
- National Cancer Institute (P-30-CA-16058, R01CA092704, R01 CA 92704, K05CA098133, P30CA016058)
- National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR025755)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
- Keywords
- breast cancer recurrence, psychological intervention, survival after recurrence, psychological distress, NK cell cytotoxicity, T cell proliferation, immune function, biobehavioral mechanisms, medication adherence, social support
- MeSH terms
- Behavior, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Insurance Benefits, Killer Cells, Natural, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Psychotherapy, Recurrence, Survival Analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
