Cited by 418Lung Cancer Treatments and MutationsHER2/EGFR in Cancer ResearchLung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

Disease Flare after Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Discontinuation in Patients with EGFR-Mutant Lung Cancer and Acquired Resistance to Erlotinib or Gefitinib: Implications for Clinical Trial Design

Open access
Chaft, Jamie E., Oxnard, Geoffrey R., Sima, Camelia S., Kris, Mark G., Miller, Vincent A., Riely, Gregory J.·2011·Clinical Cancer Research

Abstract

Purpose: Treatment of patients with oncogene-addicted cancers with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) is biologically and clinically different than with cytotoxic chemotherapy. We have observed that some patients with EGFR-mutant lung cancer and acquired resistance to erlotinib or gefitinib (RECIST progression after initial benefit) have accelerated progression of disease after discontinuation of TKI. To examine this observation and define the course of patients following TKI discontinuation, we systematically evaluated patients enrolled on clinical trials of agents to treat acquired resistance to erlotinib or gefitinib. Methods: We evaluated patients with EGFR-mutant lung cancer who participated in trials for patients with acquired resistance that mandated TKI discontinuation before administration of study therapy. Disease flare was defined as hospitalization or death attributable to disease progression during the washout period. Results: Fourteen of 61 patients (23%; 95% CI: 14–35) experienced a disease flare. The median time to disease flare after TKI discontinuation was 8 days (range 3–21). Factors associated with disease flare included shorter time to progression on initial TKI (P = 0.002) and the presence of pleural (P = 0.03) or CNS disease (P = 0.01). There was no association between disease flare and the presence of T790M at the time of acquired resistance. Conclusions: In patients with EGFR-mutant lung cancer and acquired resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor TKIs, discontinuation of erlotinib or gefitinib before initiation of study treatment is associated with a clinically significant risk of accelerated disease progression. Clinical trials in this patient population must minimize protocol-mandated washout periods. Clin Cancer Res; 17(19); 6298–303. ©2011 AACR.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-11-1468

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • One analysis found that 14/61 patients (23%) who discontinued erlotinib/gefitinib treatment experienced a disease flare, with median time to flare of 8 days.

    “one analysis found that 14/61 patients (23%) who discontinued erlotinib/gefitinib treatment experienced a disease flare (defined as hospitalization or death due to disease progression), with a median time to disease flare following EGFR TKI discontinuation of 8 days.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. [1]Fukuoka M Yano S Giaccone G Tamura T Nakagawa K Douillard JY Multi-institutional randomized phase II trial of gefitinib for previously treated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (The IDEAL 1 Trial) [corrected] J Clin Oncol 2003 21 2237 46 12748244
  2. [3]Miller VA Johnson DH Krug LM Pizzo B Tyson L Perez W Pilot trial of the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib plus carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with stage IIIB or IV non-small-cell lung cancer J Clin Oncol 2003 21 2094 100 12775734
  3. [4]Miller VA Kris MG Shah N Patel J Azzoli C Gomez J Bronchioloalveolar pathologic subtype and smoking history predict sensitivity to gefitinib in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer J Clin Oncol 2004 22 1103 9 15020612
  4. [5]Maemondo M Inoue A Kobayashi K Sugawara S Oizumi S Isobe H Gefitinib or chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer with mutated EGFR N Engl J Med 2010 362 2380 8 20573926
  5. [8]Jackman D Pao W Riely GJ Engelman JA Kris MG Janne PA Clinical definition of acquired resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in non-small-cell lung cancer J Clin Oncol 2010 28 357 60 19949011 PMC3870288
  6. [9]Ettinger DS Akerley W Bepler G Blum MG Chang A Cheney RT Non-small cell lung cancer J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2010 8 740 801 20679538
  7. [10]Oxnard GR Arcila ME Sima CS Riely GJ Chmielecki J Kris MG Acquired Resistance to EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in EGFR-Mutant Lung Cancer: Distinct Natural History of Patients with Tumors Harboring the T790M Mutation Clin Cancer Res 2011 17 1616 22 21135146 PMC3060283
  8. [11]Li AR Chitale D Riely GJ Pao W Miller VA Zakowski MF EGFR mutations in lung adenocarcinomas: clinical testing experience and relationship to EGFR gene copy number and immunohistochemical expression J Mol Diagn 2008 10 242 8 18403609 PMC2329789
  9. [12]Arcila ME Oxnard GR Nafa K Riely GJ Solomon SB Zakowski MF Rebiopsy of Lung Cancer Patients with Acquired Resistance to EGFR Inhibitors and Enhanced Detection of the T790M Mutation Using a Locked Nucleic Acid-Based Assay Clin Cancer Res 2011 17 1169 80 21248300 PMC3070951
  10. [13]Price KA Azzoli CG Krug LM Pietanza MC Rizvi NA Pao W Phase II trial of gefitinib and everolimus in advanced non-small cell lung cancer J Thorac Oncol 2010 5 1623 9 20871262 PMC4020424
  11. [14]Riely GJ Kris MG Zhao B Akhurst T Milton DT Moore E Prospective assessment of discontinuation and reinitiation of erlotinib or gefitinib in patients with acquired resistance to erlotinib or gefitinib followed by the addition of everolimus Clin Cancer Res 2007 13 5150 5 17785570
  12. [16]Sequist LV Besse B Lynch TJ Miller VA Wong KK Gitlitz B Neratinib, an irreversible pan-ErbB receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor: results of a phase II trial in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer J Clin Oncol 2010 28 3076 83 20479403
  13. [18]Shankar S vanSonnenberg E Desai J Dipiro PJ Van Den Abbeele A Demetri GD Gastrointestinal stromal tumor: new nodule-within-a-mass pattern of recurrence after partial response to imatinib mesylate Radiology 2005 235 892 8 15833985
  14. [21]Sharma SV Lee DY Li B Quinlan MP Takahashi F Maheswaran S A chromatin-mediated reversible drug-tolerant state in cancer cell subpopulations Cell 2010 141 69 80 20371346 PMC2851638
  15. [22]Ling J Johnson KA Miao Z Rakhit A Pantze MP Hamilton M Metabolism and excretion of erlotinib, a small molecule inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase, in healthy male volunteers Drug Metab Dispos 2006 34 420 6 16381666
  16. [23]Demetri GD von Mehren M Blanke CD Van den Abbeele AD Eisenberg B Roberts PJ Efficacy and safety of imatinib mesylate in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors N Engl J Med 2002 347 472 80 12181401
  17. [24]Druker BJ Imatinib: A Viewpoint by Brian J. Druker. Drugs 2001 61 1775 6 11735629
  18. [25]Flaherty KT Puzanov I Kim KB Ribas A McArthur GA Sosman JA Inhibition of mutated, activated BRAF in metastatic melanoma N Engl J Med 2010 363 809 19 20818844 PMC3724529
  19. [26]Kwak EL Bang Y-J Camidge DR Shaw AT Solomon B Maki RG Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Inhibition in Non,ÄìSmall-Cell Lung Cancer New England of Medicine 2010 363 1693 703 PMC3014291 20979469
  20. [27]Le Cesne A Ray-Coquard I Bui BN Adenis A Rios M Bertucci F Discontinuation of imatinib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours after 3 years of treatment: an open-label multicentre randomised phase 3 trial Lancet Oncol 2010 11 942 9 20864406

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chaft, J. E., Oxnard, G. R., Sima, C. S., Kris, M. G., Miller, V. A., & Riely, G. J.
Affiliations
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
Riely, Gregory J.
Venue
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2011-10-01
Volume
17
Issue
19
Pages
6298-6303
ISSN
  • 1078-0432 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-3265
OpenAlex
W2128208856
Cited by
418
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 47 · 2014: 52 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 26
FWCI
34.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (P01CA129243, T32CA009207, R25CA020449)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
EGFR-mutant lung cancer, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, erlotinib, gefitinib, acquired drug resistance, disease flares, TKI discontinuation, washout period, T790M, pleural disease, central nervous system disorders, time to progression, clinical trial design
MeSH terms
Erlotinib Hydrochloride, Gefitinib, Adult, Aged, Antineoplastic Agents, Female, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Mutation, Quinazolines, Time Factors, Disease Progression, Drug Resistance, Neoplasm, Withholding Treatment, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, ErbB Receptors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review